RealGM

Idea is:

Portland pushes all in. Dame/Powell/Grant/RoCo/Simmons (Yes, I'm playing Simmons at center).

Pistons get a great return on investment for Grant. Those top 5 protected picks that far out for this Blazer team that may implode have a lot value.

Sixers get CJ + 2 firsts for Simmons, I think that's fair.

Hornets give a non-lotto first for a starting center, I think Nurk is worth that much. Zeller needs to be signed and traded to work. I don't think he'll get more than this, but he's a good backup big in Portland.

I'm not sure I would do this for Portland given how unprotected those picks are, but this is the type of deal that would make Dame happy.

Count me in on a lottery protected 1st for Nurk, as long as it can never convey as a lottery 1st and turns into 2nds if we don't make the playoffs over the next couple years rather than go unprotected. With any luck, it won't matter, but I tend to worry about the worst case scenario when it comes to this team.

I love the resulting Blazers squad here, the switchability defensively is very intriguing provided you have a coach that can make it all work. Hopefully Chauncey knows what he's doing defensively.

Yeah I really salute the effort here. Don't want to get into Simmons/CJ again too much but I want to say Philly should get 2 of the lightly protected Portland picks and Detroit should take the lotto protected Hornets pick. I have you overpaying for Grant and I appreciate that because you realize you need to talk Detroit into dealing him period. But 2 firsts is still an overpayment.

Like the final team for Portland for sure and you didn't hold back paying to get what you wanted to get done. Salute. Well done.

Is zeller worth getting hardcapped?

Texas Chuck wrote:Yeah I really salute the effort here. Don't want to get into Simmons/CJ again too much but I want to say Philly should get 2 of the lightly protected Portland picks and Detroit should take the lotto protected Hornets pick. I have you overpaying for Grant and I appreciate that because you realize you need to talk Detroit into dealing him period. But 2 firsts is still an overpayment.

Like the final team for Portland for sure and you didn't hold back paying to get what you wanted to get done. Salute. Well done.

I think that's fair if Detroit is okay with it.

I realize I'm overpaying a bit, but that's the pressure Dame is putting on the team. If they don't go for something like this, well I think they may as well trade Dame right now.

Godaddycurse wrote:Is zeller worth getting hardcapped?

****. This doesn't work because Portland can't resign Powell after. ****

Dame 44
Powell 20
Simmons 33
Grant 20
Covington 13
Elleby 1
Simons 4
Little 2
Zeller 7

144M for 9 players. I'm pretty sure that's over the hard cap already.

Malapropism wrote:

Texas Chuck wrote:Yeah I really salute the effort here. Don't want to get into Simmons/CJ again too much but I want to say Philly should get 2 of the lightly protected Portland picks and Detroit should take the lotto protected Hornets pick. I have you overpaying for Grant and I appreciate that because you realize you need to talk Detroit into dealing him period. But 2 firsts is still an overpayment.

Like the final team for Portland for sure and you didn't hold back paying to get what you wanted to get done. Salute. Well done.

I need you to help me out here. How do I balance this?

I realize I'm overpaying a bit, but that's the pressure Dame is putting on the team. If they don't go for something like this, well I think they may as well trade Dame right now.

If Philly would do Simmons for CJ + 2 1sts, I would target Christian Wood instead of Grant personally. Better shooter/fit with the roster imo.

Malapropism wrote:

Godaddycurse wrote:Is zeller worth getting hardcapped?

****. This doesn't work because Portland can't resign Powell after. ****

if this helps, we don't need to use Zeller for salary matching, we have cap space enough for Nurkic once we've renounced and cut some unguaranteed scrubs... Zeller or another FA center could sign for however much of the TPE the Blazers can use.

I think you're overpaying for Simmons here. CJ and a 1st should be enough at this point, if it costs the 1st at all.

I'd also agree you're overpaying for Grant but, as Chuck said, you probably have to to convince Detroit to move him. And if it doesn't cost as many 1sts I'd cut Charlotte out entirely and keep Nurkic.

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:

Malapropism wrote:

Godaddycurse wrote:Is zeller worth getting hardcapped?

****. This doesn't work because Portland can't resign Powell after. ****

if this helps, we don't need to use Zeller for salary matching, we have cap space enough for Nurkic once we've renounced and cut some unguaranteed scrubs... Zeller or another FA center could sign for however much of the TPE the Blazers can use.

True but I actually had Zeller with value for Portland. I think you need at least one solid big that can start for you in certain matchups, and Zeller was that.

I suppose they could try to sign him with their TPMLE so they won't have to get hardcapped. Then fill out the rest with minimum guys. Would Zeller take 5 million? At that point I think he may go somewhere else.

Or they could look for some other big. I would need to see who is available...

Malapropism wrote:

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:

Malapropism wrote:
****. This doesn't work because Portland can't resign Powell after. ****

if this helps, we don't need to use Zeller for salary matching, we have cap space enough for Nurkic once we've renounced and cut some unguaranteed scrubs... Zeller or another FA center could sign for however much of the TPE the Blazers can use.

True but I actually had Zeller with value for Portland. I think you need at least one solid big that can start for you in certain matchups, and Zeller was that.

I suppose they could try to sign him with their TPMLE so they won't have to get hardcapped. Then fill out the rest with minimum guys. Would Zeller take 5 million? At that point I think he may go somewhere else.

Or they could look for some other big. I would need to see who is available...

I got the top of Zeller market at the TMLE, I think you are good there.

Nice trade. Cool website too...never been there...bookmarked.

Someone had a great point that if Nurk was taken into capspace it would generate a TPE for the Blazers to use on a center. Zeller could be S&T into that TPE, or they could try to take Derrick Favors or someone into the TPE.

shangrila wrote:I think you're overpaying for Simmons here. CJ and a 1st should be enough at this point, if it costs the 1st at all.

I'd also agree you're overpaying for Grant but, as Chuck said, you probably have to to convince Detroit to move him. And if it doesn't cost as many 1sts I'd cut Charlotte out entirely and keep Nurkic.

Aside from the fact that Simmons is straight up better, there’s a 5 year age gap here..

shangrila wrote:I think you're overpaying for Simmons here. CJ and a 1st should be enough at this point, if it costs the 1st at all.

I'd also agree you're overpaying for Grant but, as Chuck said, you probably have to to convince Detroit to move him. And if it doesn't cost as many 1sts I'd cut Charlotte out entirely and keep Nurkic.

In the ideal scenario I agree. But I think other GMs know Portland is in desperation mode, so I think they may have to overpay a bit, especially since this deal is quite complicated.

Also not sure if Nurk is happy playing a bench role. But I'd love to keep him and move him down the line since it's theoretically just preserving some value.

Malapropism wrote:Someone had a great point that if Nurk was taken into capspace it would generate a TPE for the Blazers to use on a center. Zeller could be S&T into that TPE, or they could try to take Derrick Favors or someone into the TPE.

Portland needs to avoid receiving a SNT player, don't want the restrictions that come with the hard cap. Maybe if you let Powell walk then you can have the wiggle room, but letting Powell walk be blow to their talent level and should not be the goal.

TMLE or trading for a center like Favors using the TPE are the better paths forward.

Awesome in theory, but nearly enough value for Ben unfortunately.

psman2 wrote:

Malapropism wrote:Someone had a great point that if Nurk was taken into capspace it would generate a TPE for the Blazers to use on a center. Zeller could be S&T into that TPE, or they could try to take Derrick Favors or someone into the TPE.

Portland needs to avoid receiving a SNT player, don't want the restrictions that come with the hard cap. Maybe if you let Powell walk then you can have the wiggle room, but letting Powell walk be blow to their talent level and should not be the goal.

TMLE or trading for a center like Favors using the TPE are the better paths forward.

You're right, I forgot the hardcap rule, AGAIN.

stormi wrote:Awesome in theory, but nearly enough value for Ben unfortunately.

Yea I don’t see the interest for CJ. From the Sixers point of view and definitely not for Simmons.

For whatever reason, I cant see the picture in the OP and I get a nasty privacy error when I try to open in a new tab, so a small request to put the trade into writing as well so I can actually analyze it lol.


From the sound of it, I am not keen to get rid of Nurkic. He was looking pretty decent expanding his range to 3 this year, he's gotten better each of the past couple seasons in that regard and so I feel fine projecting him to continue adding that to his game. To me he has more value than a lottery protected 1st rounder anyways, he is a two way starting caliber center - others can disagree and not want to give up more value than that due to injury concerns but that's where I land on it that I would prefer to send out a future pick and keep him.

I would likely roll with Simmons at the 5 in end of game scenarios and Nurkic's minutes need to be kept low since he is still foul pron so I don't see those two as incompatible at all in a starting 5, but a smart coach would stagger their minutes for the bulk of the game.


If we can get Grant and don't trade Nurkic that maybe frees us up to send RoCo to Philly along with CJ instead of the extra pick? Again, I'm shooting a little blind here so I could be missing some important factor here.

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:For whatever reason, I cant see the picture in the OP and I get a nasty privacy error when I try to open in a new tab, so a small request to put the trade into writing as well so I can actually analyze it lol.


From the sound of it, I am not keen to get rid of Nurkic. He was looking pretty decent expanding his range to 3 this year, he's gotten better each of the past couple seasons in that regard and so I feel fine projecting him to continue adding that to his game. To me he has more value than a lottery protected 1st rounder anyways, he is a two way starting caliber center - others can disagree and not want to give up more value than that due to injury concerns but that's where I land on it that I would prefer to send out a future pick and keep him.

I would likely roll with Simmons at the 5 in end of game scenarios and Nurkic's minutes need to be kept low since he is still foul pron so I don't see those two as incompatible at all in a starting 5, but a smart coach would stagger their minutes for the bulk of the game.


If we can get Grant and don't trade Nurkic that maybe frees us up to send RoCo to Philly along with CJ instead of the extra pick? Again, I'm shooting a little blind here so I could be missing some important factor here.

Blazers Trades:
Nurk
CJ
Jones Jr.
Top 5 2022 pick
Top 5 2024 pick
Top 5 2026 pick

Receive:
Grant
Simmons

Charlotte Trades:
2022 pick (lotto protected)

Receives:
Nurk

Philly Trades:
Simmons

Receives:
CJ
Top 5 2022 pick
Top 5 2024 pick

Detroit Trades:
Grant

Receives:
Jones Jr.
Top 5 2026 pick
Top 14 2022 pick (From CHA)

I think that's how it ends up shaping up.