shangrila wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:shangrila wrote:Kind of?
It's more of a general statement, sure. I don't know Barea's qualifications. But when nobody can seemingly tell even what his job is supposed to be it makes me chuckle a little. In any other industry this would be textbook cronyism.
Then why automatically assume it’s cronyism? Why assume he can’t be qualified for a position is essentially showing up and sharing your knowledge? Guys have gone straight into head coaching positions before. Here, he’s learning and earning his way.
Because nobody has mentioned any qualifications or even what his job role is?
How else do you describe someone employing a former associate in an undefined role without experience in a similar field?
His job role is to be JJ Barea and share his knowledge while learning the organization for a year or more, likely to see what he wants to do down the line, and for the organization to see where he might be best. Obviously he got the job by his connections with the organization. They want him personally to work for them in any way. You call it cronyism, they light just call it “wanting to keep institutional knowledge in house”. Why assume that he’s not qualified to be JJ Barea?