Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,280
- And1: 6,327
- Joined: May 28, 2016
Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Mavs in
Harrison barnes
Tristan Thompson via tpe.
2 2nds via okc
Sacramento in
Dorian finney smith
Moses brown
Josh green
Okc in
Willie cauley stein
Trey burke
25 1st from Dallas lotto protected
Mavs get a big upgrade at wing and a solid upgrade at center, barnes was a bad #1 but he'd fit excellent here...
Sacramento is again at the bottom of the conference, they move barnes and Thompson for 20m in savings this season and 12m next if they let dfs go. For this season though they get a versatile forward and two decent prospects
Okc just adds to their first round picks they need to get to the salary floor anyways so they eat some money for a pick
Harrison barnes
Tristan Thompson via tpe.
2 2nds via okc
Sacramento in
Dorian finney smith
Moses brown
Josh green
Okc in
Willie cauley stein
Trey burke
25 1st from Dallas lotto protected
Mavs get a big upgrade at wing and a solid upgrade at center, barnes was a bad #1 but he'd fit excellent here...
Sacramento is again at the bottom of the conference, they move barnes and Thompson for 20m in savings this season and 12m next if they let dfs go. For this season though they get a versatile forward and two decent prospects
Okc just adds to their first round picks they need to get to the salary floor anyways so they eat some money for a pick
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,425
- And1: 12,503
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
- Location: within Mark Williams' reach
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
There's probably a direct swap to be made, but in this proposal the only piece of actual value to Sacramento, is going to OKC for eating a very minimal amount of salary.
formerly KEMBAtheMETEOR
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,689
- And1: 7,039
- Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Sacramento turned down multiple firsts from Boston last year…. And Barnes has been better this year
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,456
- And1: 1,360
- Joined: Dec 11, 2019
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Crives wrote:Sacramento turned down multiple firsts from Boston last year…. And Barnes has been better this year
Danny Ainge offered multiple 1st rd picks for Barnes? why was this not reported in Boston? What I heard was that he talked and was immediately shut down. Even if this was so, you have to take into account that he now has one year less of service to the acquiring team.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,848
- And1: 3,364
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Pinkyring wrote:Mavs in
Harrison barnes
Tristan Thompson via tpe.
2 2nds via okc
Sacramento in
Dorian finney smith
Moses brown
Josh green
Okc in
Willie cauley stein
Trey burke
25 1st from Dallas lotto protected
Mavs get a big upgrade at wing and a solid upgrade at center, barnes was a bad #1 but he'd fit excellent here...
Sacramento is again at the bottom of the conference, they move barnes and Thompson for 20m in savings this season and 12m next if they let dfs go. For this season though they get a versatile forward and two decent prospects
Okc just adds to their first round picks they need to get to the salary floor anyways so they eat some money for a pick
Since Sacramento is taking a step back by moving Barnes, I would expect them to explore an alternative scenario with them getting the Dallas first instead of having OKC leach value.
Barnes for Powell, Burke, Green, Dallas First
Thompson into the TPE
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,694
- And1: 10,617
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Probably have to switch the 1st and one of the prospects at least.
I bought a boat.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,511
- And1: 88,346
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:There's probably a direct swap to be made, but in this proposal the only piece of actual value to Sacramento, is going to OKC for eating a very minimal amount of salary.
Yeah I'm confused why OKC is even here. If the idea is to trade Barnes, it should be to get assets, not salary relief. DFS is a nice player who fits a real need for the Kings(if they were keeping Barnes and trying to win) but he's a role player and an expiring one and a guy who hasn't made real money yet and will be prioritizing money this off-season as a result and while he might cut Dallas a break if its close, he would have no loyalty to the Kings. And that's all they get. Green and Brown hold minimal value at best.
Seems like realistically Dallas would try and send DFS to a contender who would value a 3&D guy for a playoff run and having his Bird Rights to retain him for an asset to send to the Kings. Then add the Dallas pick in the OP(maybe lighten the protections). Dallas could still leverage the TPE to take back salary for the Kings to add value, but there isn't enough value gained there where Dallas should waste it--especially if they are punting more assets.
Then Kings fans have made clear to me in my 4 or 5 Barnes trades this month that they don't believe the team will actually trade him rightfully or wrongfully.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,422
- And1: 7,143
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
This isn’t close for Sac. They aren’t throwing in the towel in November and even if they do they’ll get better return than this.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,853
- And1: 7,522
- Joined: May 16, 2018
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Barnes to Dallas makes to much sense given the Mavericks lack of skilled players. Especially players who can fill in at SF and play PF beside KP. I see why the Kings don't move Barnes; but if they are still a sub .500 team at the deadline, I think they should at least explore it.
BAF Pacers: Unleash Trae!
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,416
- And1: 2,434
- Joined: Dec 26, 2009
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
I would make it WCS, Burke, Josh Green, Moses, 1 FRP, 1 or 2 SRP for Barnes followed by TPE for Thompson. Ton of cash savings, some picks and 2 low end prospects. I know it's not the best offer but not sure what else the Mavs can offer.
Barnes would be a really good fit on the current team.
Barnes would be a really good fit on the current team.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 13,342
- And1: 10,037
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Mavs trade:
Powell
Green
WCS
1st
2nd
Get:
Favors (TPE)
Barnes
OKC trades Favors for Powell + 2nd
Kings trade:
Barnes
For Green, WCS, 1st
Powell
Green
WCS
1st
2nd
Get:
Favors (TPE)
Barnes
OKC trades Favors for Powell + 2nd
Kings trade:
Barnes
For Green, WCS, 1st
blicka wrote:Can't wait to see doncic on an island vs jimmy butler,paul george or kahwi leonard and those weak ass moves that work in europe getting shut down
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,819
- And1: 1,929
- Joined: Jan 18, 2019
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,006
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Apz wrote:My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
You dont think Barnes could be the #2 guy to Doncic now? He's a great fit. Not ball-dominant, great 3pt shooter, defensively versatile.. I've called out Barnes for years for not being the guy he is now. Think that his style is a perfect complement to Luka. And the efficiency has become insane with him, 20 ppg on 12.5 spg?
Barnes I think is one of the truly undervalue trade commodities out there. He'd be an amazing #3 or competent #2 on a contender, IMO. I'd love for the W's to somehow bring him back. But such a great fit in DAL IMO - so hard to find top scoring options who aren't selfish
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,819
- And1: 1,929
- Joined: Jan 18, 2019
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
FNQ wrote:Apz wrote:My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
You dont think Barnes could be the #2 guy to Doncic now? He's a great fit. Not ball-dominant, great 3pt shooter, defensively versatile.. I've called out Barnes for years for not being the guy he is now. Think that his style is a perfect complement to Luka. And the efficiency has become insane with him, 20 ppg on 12.5 spg?
Barnes I think is one of the truly undervalue trade commodities out there. He'd be an amazing #3 or competent #2 on a contender, IMO. I'd love for the W's to somehow bring him back. But such a great fit in DAL IMO - so hard to find top scoring options who aren't selfish
He is at best 3rd or 4th, if u want to win. Would go as far as saying KP is higher, and he is probably 3. And we tried him before as lukas 2, didnt work, and when discussed people just say "He was asked to do too much, he is a roleplayer". Yeah, if u gonna be 2 on a championship team u better be doing lots of stuff, but he is not, he is just good old birdcage barnes.
Mavs cant give out 1sts for roleplayers, even good ones, or mavs will never be able to land a 2 for luka
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,615
- And1: 10,252
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
Why would SAC want to turn a starter into 3 bench guys?
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,039
- And1: 340
- Joined: Jan 22, 2020
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
SAC has been out of playoff for many years already, their plan should be upgrading their talents, this trade serve exactly the opposite
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,511
- And1: 88,346
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
JRoy wrote:Why would SAC want to turn a starter into 3 bench guys?
Dorian Finney-Smith has been a starter for years. And okay I agree on some teams he probably wouldn't. But the Kings start Mo Harkless so does not apply here.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,464
- And1: 1,348
- Joined: Jul 23, 2004
- Location: Office
- Contact:
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
FNQ wrote:Apz wrote:My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
You dont think Barnes could be the #2 guy to Doncic now? He's a great fit. Not ball-dominant, great 3pt shooter, defensively versatile.. I've called out Barnes for years for not being the guy he is now. Think that his style is a perfect complement to Luka. And the efficiency has become insane with him, 20 ppg on 12.5 spg?
Barnes I think is one of the truly undervalue trade commodities out there. He'd be an amazing #3 or competent #2 on a contender, IMO. I'd love for the W's to somehow bring him back. But such a great fit in DAL IMO - so hard to find top scoring options who aren't selfish
Barnes definitely isn't a #2 on a contender. A #3 might be a stretch too, but he is definitely a reliable #4 with a great amount of versatility on both ends of the floor.
The Mavs would be looking like Luka #1, KP #2, THJ #3, Barnes #4.
Does this elevate the Mavs enough? IMO perhaps it does because what #2 or #3 could they get that doesn't need the ball in their hands, shoots well from outside and plays decent enough D?
On the other hand does this put the Mavs in an area where they have a group of guys that are good but not great?
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
Sydney Kings
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,006
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
simonbampfield wrote:FNQ wrote:Apz wrote:My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
You dont think Barnes could be the #2 guy to Doncic now? He's a great fit. Not ball-dominant, great 3pt shooter, defensively versatile.. I've called out Barnes for years for not being the guy he is now. Think that his style is a perfect complement to Luka. And the efficiency has become insane with him, 20 ppg on 12.5 spg?
Barnes I think is one of the truly undervalue trade commodities out there. He'd be an amazing #3 or competent #2 on a contender, IMO. I'd love for the W's to somehow bring him back. But such a great fit in DAL IMO - so hard to find top scoring options who aren't selfish
Barnes definitely isn't a #2 on a contender. A #3 might be a stretch too, but he is definitely a reliable #4 with a great amount of versatility on both ends of the floor.
The Mavs would be looking like Luka #1, KP #2, THJ #3, Barnes #4.
Does this elevate the Mavs enough? IMO perhaps it does because what #2 or #3 could they get that doesn't need the ball in their hands, shoots well from outside and plays decent enough D?
On the other hand does this put the Mavs in an area where they have a group of guys that are good but not great?
We’re 16-2 and our #2 option scores the same as Barnes but on way less efficiency
If the market on him is depressed, I hope the Warriors get involved
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,280
- And1: 6,327
- Joined: May 28, 2016
Re: Bsrnes back to dallas with okc
simonbampfield wrote:FNQ wrote:Apz wrote:My camp is still no. Barnes isnt good enough to make mavs a contender, so mavs shoildnt trade any 1st until they landed the no2 guy
You dont think Barnes could be the #2 guy to Doncic now? He's a great fit. Not ball-dominant, great 3pt shooter, defensively versatile.. I've called out Barnes for years for not being the guy he is now. Think that his style is a perfect complement to Luka. And the efficiency has become insane with him, 20 ppg on 12.5 spg?
Barnes I think is one of the truly undervalue trade commodities out there. He'd be an amazing #3 or competent #2 on a contender, IMO. I'd love for the W's to somehow bring him back. But such a great fit in DAL IMO - so hard to find top scoring options who aren't selfish
Barnes definitely isn't a #2 on a contender. A #3 might be a stretch too, but he is definitely a reliable #4 with a great amount of versatility on both ends of the floor.
The Mavs would be looking like Luka #1, KP #2, THJ #3, Barnes #4.
Does this elevate the Mavs enough? IMO perhaps it does because what #2 or #3 could they get that doesn't need the ball in their hands, shoots well from outside and plays decent enough D?
On the other hand does this put the Mavs in an area where they have a group of guys that are good but not great?
We'd need to make another move or 2 to balance some things but yes adding him makes us a contender, fyi he's a lot better than Hardaway jr. As for your good to great question, luka is great and kp can be great on any given night so yes that foursome healthy should be enough
Return to Trades and Transactions