2024 Trade Deadline Hot Takes
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:22 am
Only post or respond to hot takes... the bolder, the better... Go!
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2350882
NYG wrote:The Bulls don't sell or buy, they hold
The Pistons are buyers, not sellers
kds92 wrote:Trae Young gets traded
OxAndFox wrote:Heat trade:
Lowry/Robinson/Jovic/'27 1st (unprotected)/'29 1st (lott protected)
Blazers trade:
Grant/Brogdan/'28 GS 2nd
Blazers then trade:
Lowry
Atlanta trades:
Hunter/'24 Sac 1st lottery protected
Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Heat trade:
Lowry/Robinson/Jovic/'27 1st (unprotected)/'29 1st (lott protected)
Blazers trade:
Grant/Brogdan/'28 GS 2nd
Blazers then trade:
Lowry
Atlanta trades:
Hunter/'24 Sac 1st lottery protected
Atlanta isn't dumping Hunter with a pick in the teens.
OxAndFox wrote:Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Heat trade:
Lowry/Robinson/Jovic/'27 1st (unprotected)/'29 1st (lott protected)
Blazers trade:
Grant/Brogdan/'28 GS 2nd
Blazers then trade:
Lowry
Atlanta trades:
Hunter/'24 Sac 1st lottery protected
Atlanta isn't dumping Hunter with a pick in the teens.
It's a hot take for a reason. The Hawks might just decide to blow everything up and that's the salary they need to get off. A lot of variance with that pick. Might not even convey this year if the Kings continue to fall, or more likely they push back into the top 5-6.
Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Colbinii wrote:
Atlanta isn't dumping Hunter with a pick in the teens.
It's a hot take for a reason. The Hawks might just decide to blow everything up and that's the salary they need to get off. A lot of variance with that pick. Might not even convey this year if the Kings continue to fall, or more likely they push back into the top 5-6.
It is a hot take because teams don't trade 1sts with a productive [albeit slightly overpaid] player for dead expiring salary.
Maybe in 2015, but teams are far too smart and good to do this type of trade.
SkyHook wrote:Doncic asks to be traded.
OxAndFox wrote:Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:
It's a hot take for a reason. The Hawks might just decide to blow everything up and that's the salary they need to get off. A lot of variance with that pick. Might not even convey this year if the Kings continue to fall, or more likely they push back into the top 5-6.
It is a hot take because teams don't trade 1sts with a productive [albeit slightly overpaid] player for dead expiring salary.
Maybe in 2015, but teams are far too smart and good to do this type of trade.
Yet you think the Lakerscan get Murray and Lavine.
Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Colbinii wrote:
It is a hot take because teams don't trade 1sts with a productive [albeit slightly overpaid] player for dead expiring salary.
Maybe in 2015, but teams are far too smart and good to do this type of trade.
Yet you think the Lakerscan get Murray and Lavine.
an
I don't think LaVine has real value. I think Reaves/JHS/Unprotected 1st can get Murray, yeah.
But the difference here is I may be valuing a player differently than you while you are proposing a deal in which teams simply don't do. Teams don't use decent 1sts to dump decent players.
OxAndFox wrote:Colbinii wrote:OxAndFox wrote:
Yet you think the Lakerscan get Murray and Lavine.
an
I don't think LaVine has real value. I think Reaves/JHS/Unprotected 1st can get Murray, yeah.
But the difference here is I may be valuing a player differently than you while you are proposing a deal in which teams simply don't do. Teams don't use decent 1sts to dump decent players.
You can't honestly think the Bulls are taking back DLO/Rui or any combination of their bad contracts. I don't think Lavine has value either, but whatever the Lakers can scratch together needs incentives attached. And with no 1sts to trade it's going to be hard to get the Bulls on board with it.
JRoy wrote:SkyHook wrote:Doncic asks to be traded.
Can’t DAL have nice things?