LaMelo for Steph straight up who says no?

[JustBuzzin]

Charlotte gets hometown hero Steph Curry. He changes the culture the moment he steps on the court. Charlotte becomes a contender the following year with a core of Curry/Miller/Bridges/Mark and a top 5 pick.

Warriors get a young talented star in LaMelo and they can rebuild their team around a exciting flashy point guard.


Who says no?

[gswhoops]

Warriors definitely say no.

[winforlose]

Hornets say no. What good is a 36 year old Steph on the Hornets? Lamelo is their future. The only scenario in which the Hornets want Steph is a win now for a title. Trading TR for a first put them further away, not closer.

P.S if GSW isn’t a contender with Steph, why are the Hornets next season?

[SkyHook]

Golden State. I’m still not sure how much LaMelo affects winning; Charlotte is on a 17-win pace with him playing this season and on a 16-win pace when he sits.

[shrink]

It’s hard to evaluate this as a business decision because there is so much emotion involved in the local value.

My guess is that both sides say no.

[eminence]

A) Warriors say no.

b) That Charlotte team is not contending.

[KembaWalker]

Hard pass. LaMelo and Miller are on the same timeline. Curry can come play in his home town for free when he's old and done if he wants

[Texas Chuck]

These kinds of never ever happening hypotheticals will make great content starting Friday. Feel free to re-visit then during the long trade dead period.

Oh and GSW is never ever doing this obviously.