Page 1 of 1

CJ for Brook?

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2024 8:22 pm
by slos
Milwaukee - New Orleans

Bucks in McCollum

Pelicans in Connaughton, Lopez

Why Milwaukee? They upgrade their starting SG while making Dame more comfortable to succeed in Milwaukee. Bucks go all in offence with Giannis playing more at C moving forward with a ton of shooting around him.

Lillard...........#24
McCollum.......Green
Middleton.......Beauchamp
Giannis..........Jackson.........Livingston
Portis............#35

Why New Orleans? They clear the path for their younger guards while providing Zion a perfect match for their fronline. They also save some $$$ to bring back Val and maybe sign another good vet with the MLE.

Murphy.......Daniels........Alvarado
Jones.........Hawkins
Ingram.......Connaughton
Zion..........Nance...........Liddell
Lopez........Valanciunas....#20

Re: CJ for Brook?

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2024 9:15 pm
by jayjaysee
Mil shouldn’t pair CJM/Dame. And also I don’t think Milwaukee can aggregate salaries since they are over the apron.

But New Orleans should do it

Re: CJ for Brook?

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2024 9:57 pm
by tester551
jayjaysee wrote:Mil shouldn’t pair CJM/Dame. And also I don’t think Milwaukee can aggregate salaries since they are over the apron.

But New Orleans should do it

Agreed. We've seen that Dame/CJ show before.

And you are correct, Bucks can't do this trade.

Re: CJ for Brook?

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2024 11:26 pm
by Skybox
Last thing MIL needs...too much defense has NOT been the backcourt problem

Re: CJ for Brook?

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2024 11:46 pm
by Colbinii
tester551 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Mil shouldn’t pair CJM/Dame. And also I don’t think Milwaukee can aggregate salaries since they are over the apron.

But New Orleans should do it

Agreed. We've seen that Dame/CJ show before.


We saw it with garbage Wings and Nurcik. We never saw it with Giannis.