RealGM

Mikal Bridges for Dejounte Murray and 10th Overall

Hawks add a significantly better fitting B player next to Trae

Nets continue to wait until 2025 for their big move and add another asset while they wait

Atlanta would have to add another 1st IMO

In a normal draft 10 might do it. Maybe.

Not in this draft.

And it could me more. The asking price for Bridges seems sky high.

youngcrev wrote:Atlanta would have to add another 1st IMO

Or does Murray have enough value to be sent to a 3rd team for 2-3 1sts?

NYG wrote:

youngcrev wrote:Atlanta would have to add another 1st IMO

Or does Murray have enough value to be sent to a 3rd team for 2-3 1sts?

Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

youngcrev wrote:

NYG wrote:

youngcrev wrote:Atlanta would have to add another 1st IMO

Or does Murray have enough value to be sent to a 3rd team for 2-3 1sts?

Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

I think this is a strong offer for Bridges but I’m higher on Murray than most.

However, I can’t see Brooklyn trading Bridges before Mitchell’s contract situation is sorted out, and that’s unlikely to happen before draft night.

psman2 wrote:

youngcrev wrote:

NYG wrote:
Or does Murray have enough value to be sent to a 3rd team for 2-3 1sts?

Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

youngcrev wrote:

psman2 wrote:

youngcrev wrote:
Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

What about a team with limited assets? Lakers give 3 1sts for Dejounte but don't have a 4th for Bridges

youngcrev wrote:

psman2 wrote:

youngcrev wrote:
Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

I could see Orlando preferring the pay the price for Murray and not adding the 2 1sts needed in addition to make up the value of 10 here to land Bridges with Suggs and Wagner playing his positions.

NYG wrote:

youngcrev wrote:

psman2 wrote:
Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

What about a team with limited assets? Lakers give 3 1sts for Dejounte but don't have a 4th for Bridges

That would be the type situation you'd need... But then I'm back to why would any team give up 3 1sts for Murray?

Honestly, the Nets probably make the most sense as the landing spot for him, I just have the Hawks having at add another pick to get it done

I feel like the back and forth here is:
"The value is light for Bridges"
"Yeah, but what if another team overpays for Murray so that the Nets can get better value?"

youngcrev wrote:

NYG wrote:

youngcrev wrote:
In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

What about a team with limited assets? Lakers give 3 1sts for Dejounte but don't have a 4th for Bridges

That would be the type situation you'd need... But then I'm back to why would any team give up 3 1sts for Murray?

Honestly, the Nets probably make the most sense as the landing spot for him, I just have the Hawks having at add another pick to get it done

I feel like the back and forth here is:
"The value is light for Bridges"
"Yeah, but what if another team overpays for Murray so that the Nets can get better value?"

Would AJ Griffin being added bridge any gaps?

youngcrev wrote:

psman2 wrote:

youngcrev wrote:
Doesn't a 3rd team just figure out how to bridge the gap themselves for Bridges instead?

Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

Minnesota?

babyjax13 wrote:

youngcrev wrote:

psman2 wrote:
Very easily could be teams in the market for a PG and not a SF. I have the value in the OP about right here but if Houston is still interested likely win the day by holding the Brooklyn picks, unless OKC just really wants him too.

In a general sense from positions of need, but once you attach the actual names, I don't think it holds true. I struggle to find a team that wouldn't want Bridges more than Murray... Maybe I'm missing someone?

Minnesota?

New Orleans. They have enough wings and need PG upgrade.
Orlando probably would prefer Murray too?

Dejounte Murray, Clint Capela, AJ Griffin and 10th Overall Draft Pick for Mikal Bridges and Cam Johnson?