Page 1 of 1

UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 2:11 pm
by AingesBurner
ATL out: Murray, Capela, and filler
ATL in: Kessler, Clarkson, Connaughton, Portis, Utah 24 #10, best of the 25 picks to Utah (top 7 protected), 2 Utah 2nds, and 2 Milwaukee 2nds

Utah out: Kessler, Clarkson, Sexton, #10, 25 1st, and 2nds
Utah in: Murray and Capela

MIL: out Connaughton and Portis
MIL in: Sexton and 2 2nds


Why for Utah: Get a PG.

Why for ATL: Recoup some picks and get a starting C prospect. Also, Quin loves Clarkson. Get more depth.

Why for MIL: Get a 6th man. Not sure how Milwaukee values Connaughton and Portis.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 2:54 pm
by Godaddycurse
i dont think milwaukee can aggregae salary they are quite close to 2nd apron

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 3:00 pm
by German Athens
Godaddycurse wrote:i dont think milwaukee can aggregae salary they are quite close to 2nd apron


Yeah, as it stands right now, we can’t aggregate salary. We’d have to send brook out first and bring back ~1.7m less in salary.

Even still, this is a no from the bucks. We need to build around our big 3, and we have bigger roster priorities than scoring punch off the bench. If we’re keeping the big 3 intact, we have brook, Bobby, and pat as our tradeable salaries to retool.

I think most bucks fans would list: perimeter defense, more versatile defensive big, and switchable combo forward as more pressing needs than backcourt scoring help. It’s a need for the bucks, but it’s just too far down the list.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 3:59 pm
by WinterSoldier
AingesBurner wrote:ATL out: Murray, Capela, and filler
ATL in: Kessler, Clarkson, Connaughton, Portis, Utah 24 #10, best of the 25 picks to Utah (top 7 protected), 2 Utah 2nds, and 2 Milwaukee 2nds

Utah out: Kessler, Clarkson, Sexton, #10, 25 1st, and 2nds
Utah in: Murray and Capela

MIL: out Connaughton and Portis
MIL in: Sexton and 2 2nds


Why for Utah: Get a PG.

Why for ATL: Recoup some picks and get a starting C prospect. Also, Quin loves Clarkson. Get more depth.

Why for MIL: Get a 6th man. Not sure how Milwaukee values Connaughton and Portis.


I'm not entirely sure that Murray was much better than Sexton this year. I just don't like this for the Jazz now or in the long run.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 5:52 pm
by babyjax13
Sexton and Kessler feels fine on value to me for Murray. Couldn't be a direct trade because Atlanta won't need either guy.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 8:08 pm
by Kencapers68
AingesBurner wrote:ATL out: Murray, Capela, and filler
ATL in: Kessler, Clarkson, Connaughton, Portis, Utah 24 #10, best of the 25 picks to Utah (top 7 protected), 2 Utah 2nds, and 2 Milwaukee 2nds

Utah out: Kessler, Clarkson, Sexton, #10, 25 1st, and 2nds
Utah in: Murray and Capela

MIL: out Connaughton and Portis
MIL in: Sexton and 2 2nds


Why for Utah: Get a PG.

Why for ATL: Recoup some picks and get a starting C prospect. Also, Quin loves Clarkson. Get more depth.

Why for MIL: Get a 6th man. Not sure how Milwaukee values Connaughton and Portis.

No way the Bucks do this. Not enough value, plus they still have Dame. Sexton is a starter

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 8:13 pm
by JayMKE
Don't see the fit with the Bucks

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 8:29 pm
by psman2
I don't think Atlanta would want a center back here even while moving Capela.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 8:33 pm
by jayjaysee
babyjax13 wrote:Sexton and Kessler feels fine on value to me for Murray. Couldn't be a direct trade because Atlanta won't need either guy.


Yeah, it’s sort of a weird base for both teams, but the value feels really good there.

Re: UTA/MIL/ATL

Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 5:24 am
by Wolverine
You can't be a Jazz fan posting this. It's attrocious