MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,453
And1: 14,197
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#1 » by HornetJail » Mon May 27, 2024 3:21 am

I'm mostly interested in whether these are seen as good fits... i feel like it's impossible to value Mikal and KAT right now, there are huge ranges in what's considered good value... but I'm gonna try.



Wolves trade KAT, [2031 1st]
Wolves receive Garland, DFS

Minnesota, despite their great run, show their roster imbalance and KAT's fit just doesn't seem to be there anymore. They swap out their uber talented big for great fits at PG in Garland and 3&D forward DFS. There is a tiny bit of cap savings in there too.

Cavs trade Garland, Niang, [#20]
Cavs receive Mikal Bridges, Grant Williams

Cleveland swaps out Garland for fit around Mitchell as Garland has seemed somewhat marginalized next to Mitchell. Mikal is 3&D super deluxe while Grant is straight up 3&D no frills. Both make a ton of sense between Mitchell and the Cavs bigs. Also notable cap savings, roughly the amount of Niang's contract.

Hornets trade [#6, 2027 CHA 1st], Grant Williams, filler (Richards, Martin, Bertans... 1 yr $18M guaranteed between them), cap space
Hornets receive KAT

Charlotte stops running in place, bets on themselves, and actually tries to win. Huge gamble on health of their existing players and their new coaching staff, but LaMelo/Miller/Miles Bridges/Towns/Williams is a top 5 with enough talent to compete... if healthy. The bench still needs work for sure, but gotta start somewhere.

Brooklyn trade Mikal Bridges, DFS
Brooklyn receives [#6, #20, 2027 CHA 1st, 2031 MIN 1st], Charlotte filler, Niang

The Nets pick a direction, and that direction is asset collection. They get several picks, including a 6th pick this year, some cap savings, and a bunch of bite size contracts to throw around in Presti/Ainge style salary dump trades for more assets.
investigate Adam Silver
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,882
And1: 35,965
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#2 » by jbk1234 » Mon May 27, 2024 3:42 am

Basically every team involved in this would want to cut the Hornets out.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,732
And1: 10,072
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#3 » by amcoolio » Mon May 27, 2024 7:25 am

Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 7,973
And1: 2,819
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#4 » by Wolveswin » Mon May 27, 2024 8:16 am

amcoolio wrote:Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead

Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,732
And1: 10,072
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#5 » by amcoolio » Mon May 27, 2024 8:43 am

Wolveswin wrote:
amcoolio wrote:Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead

Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.


Towns' contract makes it near impossible to get the players you want. Just getting off the Towns money and getting 3 first round picks back since they have none (not to mention Charlotte has been incompetent and CHA firsts are super valuable)
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 7,973
And1: 2,819
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#6 » by Wolveswin » Mon May 27, 2024 11:49 am

amcoolio wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:
amcoolio wrote:Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead

Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.


Towns' contract makes it near impossible to get the players you want. Just getting off the Towns money and getting 3 first round picks back since they have none (not to mention Charlotte has been incompetent and CHA firsts are super valuable)

Might all be true - completely wrong direction for Wolves and not at all of interest to them. Wolves are a win-now team, they will not make a picks based package trade. DOA.
User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,963
And1: 2,698
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#7 » by luciano-davidwesley » Mon May 27, 2024 10:31 pm

Wolveswin wrote:
amcoolio wrote:Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead

Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.

KAT is an albatross in waiting on that contract. He's all yours and I'm unsure why the KAT to CHA dead horse keeps getting flogged.
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,926
And1: 2,565
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#8 » by mcfly1204 » Mon May 27, 2024 10:42 pm

luciano-davidwesley wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:
amcoolio wrote:Charlotte can just trade 3 firsts and filler for KAT, it doesn't need all this complication

And if that is all it took for Mikal and DFS Charlotte should just go for that instead

Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.

KAT is an albatross in waiting on that contract. He's all yours and I'm unsure why the KAT to CHA dead horse keeps getting flogged.

I think there are 15 players slated to make around $50 million next season, which makes me think his contract will not be as unmovable as you might think.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 7,973
And1: 2,819
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#9 » by Wolveswin » Mon May 27, 2024 11:02 pm

mcfly1204 wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Charlotte can offer that - but Wolves say no. Wolves don’t need or want or accept a picks based package for Towns. You need to try and think about what other team may want in transaction - more so when a core player being traded.

KAT is an albatross in waiting on that contract. He's all yours and I'm unsure why the KAT to CHA dead horse keeps getting flogged.

I think there are 15 players slated to make around $50 million next season, which makes me think his contract will not be as unmovable as you might think.

This. 25 players above 40M. And this is before new CBA (previous contracts handed out) and before free agency, and before next round of extensions handed out.
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,160
And1: 2,497
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#10 » by Mr Loggins » Tue May 28, 2024 10:52 am

I think if cavs-min are going to be involved in a trade, it would center around Garland to Minny and KAT to cleveland with filller to balance out salary.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#11 » by shrink » Tue May 28, 2024 12:22 pm

Wolveswin wrote:
mcfly1204 wrote:I think there are 15 players slated to make around $50 million next season, which makes me think his contract will not be as unmovable as you might think.

This. 25 players above 40M. And this is before new CBA (previous contracts handed out) and before free agency, and before next round of extensions handed out.

I agree. Some Wolves fans were disappointed that the cap next year will only go up 3.66%, because it meant less wiggle room under the second apron. Personally, I thought it was a good thing longterm because KAT (and Ant’s) max extensions are tied to the cap, so their first year will be smaller, and all future increases are raises based on that first year. With the rich new tv deal creating 10% cap increases starting in 2026, Towns and Ant’s deals will be relatively cheaper than upcoming max deals for the foreseeable future.
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,167
And1: 2,508
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#12 » by toooskies » Tue May 28, 2024 1:33 pm

shrink wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:
mcfly1204 wrote:I think there are 15 players slated to make around $50 million next season, which makes me think his contract will not be as unmovable as you might think.

This. 25 players above 40M. And this is before new CBA (previous contracts handed out) and before free agency, and before next round of extensions handed out.

I agree. Some Wolves fans were disappointed that the cap next year will only go up 3.66%, because it meant less wiggle room under the second apron. Personally, I thought it was a good thing longterm because KAT (and Ant’s) max extensions are tied to the cap, so their first year will be smaller, and all future increases are raises based on that first year. With the rich new tv deal creating 10% cap increases starting in 2026, Towns and Ant’s deals will be relatively cheaper than upcoming max deals for the foreseeable future.

This effect is pretty small. Four years of a 35%-of-cap max getting 8% raises while the cap goes up 10% will still have you making 32.5% of the cap.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 16,987
And1: 15,728
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: MIN/CLE/CHA/BRK 

Post#13 » by BK_2020 » Tue May 28, 2024 3:56 pm

Minny's issue is not roster fit, it's KAT and Ant shooting 30% from the field all of a sudden. KAT's shooting 27% on wide open threes and literal 0% on open threes. If KAT's making his open threes they are up 3-0.

Return to Trades and Transactions