Charlotte - Chicago
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,002
- And1: 13,915
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Charlotte - Chicago
Charlotte trade: Martin, Williams, Bertans (5.25 mil guaranteed, to be waived)
Chicago trade: Lavine
Why for Charlotte: make a big splash to try and win games. contract comes off the books before miller needs to be re-upped
Why for Chicago: Salary dump lavine to avoid the tax when they resign derozan and patrick williams
add seconds as needed...
Vuc
Williams
Williams
Derozan
White
Williams
Bridges
Miller
Lavine
Ball
Chicago trade: Lavine
Why for Charlotte: make a big splash to try and win games. contract comes off the books before miller needs to be re-upped
Why for Chicago: Salary dump lavine to avoid the tax when they resign derozan and patrick williams
add seconds as needed...
Vuc
Williams
Williams
Derozan
White
Williams
Bridges
Miller
Lavine
Ball
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,092
- And1: 13,668
- Joined: Jun 10, 2023
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
If we lose Bridges in FA maybe I could see this happening because we would definitely need another scorer if Bridges leaves the team.
If we keep Bridges then no I wouldn't do this deal.
If we keep Bridges then no I wouldn't do this deal.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,844
- And1: 35,928
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I assume this is Grant Williams.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
- luciano-davidwesley
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 7,963
- And1: 2,698
- Joined: Aug 03, 2002
- Location: Gold Coast
- Contact:
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
No interest in Lavine. I'd rather keep Mark Williams
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,092
- And1: 13,668
- Joined: Jun 10, 2023
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
luciano-davidwesley wrote:No interest in Lavine. I'd rather keep Mark Williams
It's Grant Williams.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,364
- And1: 4,274
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I'd do it, as a Bulls' fan. Add some depth and save $
I think it makes A LOT of sense for Char too-Lavine adds much needed scoring to their lineup
I think it makes A LOT of sense for Char too-Lavine adds much needed scoring to their lineup
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
luciano-davidwesley wrote:No interest in Lavine. I'd rather keep Mark Williams
You should be able to tell by the rotations posted in OP.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,404
- And1: 9,104
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
pipfan wrote:I'd do it, as a Bulls' fan. Add some depth and save $
I think it makes A LOT of sense for Char too-Lavine adds much needed scoring to their lineup
I'm hoping the Bulls can do better than this, even though I'm not sure if they can. One reason why I'd say no to this offer is that I'm not big on Grant Williams and he has three more years on his contract.
The other part of this trade...saving money....is nice, but if all the Bulls do with it is use it to re-sign DDR/Patrick Williams then I'm not interested. They should be able to re-sign them without having to do this, but even if they can't it's time to move on from DDR and go in a new direction.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I like the team the Hornets have left...who would you be drafting...a combo guard like Castle?maybe Shepard? forward depth at C.Williams/Buzelis?
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
- amcoolio
- Hornets Forum John Hancock
- Posts: 17,732
- And1: 10,072
- Joined: Jun 14, 2004
- Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
Charlotte should trade for a star this offseason and start trying to win, but Lavine would be the last resort IMO
That said, this trade isn't bad but I don't know where Bridges fits with the other four
That said, this trade isn't bad but I don't know where Bridges fits with the other four
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,929
- And1: 3,428
- Joined: Jun 06, 2006
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
There're a lot of injury woes in that teams future. LaMelo, Zach, Mark... throw in law issues for Miles... and a complete disregard of defense. They might be fun though.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,364
- And1: 4,274
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I think this team is really fun, and could easily sneak into the playoffs
Ball
Lavine
Miller
Bridges
Williams
Plus Thor, Richards, Smith Jr, Micic and the #6 on the bench
Char can't keep sucking and really needs shooting. Lots of pressure for Williams to anchor the D, but a fun team
Bulls add 2 bench pieces with Martin and Williams. Any way they can get a second round pick or two? #42 would help make this deal work
Ball
Lavine
Miller
Bridges
Williams
Plus Thor, Richards, Smith Jr, Micic and the #6 on the bench
Char can't keep sucking and really needs shooting. Lots of pressure for Williams to anchor the D, but a fun team
Bulls add 2 bench pieces with Martin and Williams. Any way they can get a second round pick or two? #42 would help make this deal work
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,897
- And1: 1,916
- Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
No interest in Lavine. A guy owed that much money and only played 25 games last year is to scary. Would have to see him play a full season of games before considering it. I think it is more likely he is dealing with a chronic injury though and will never be right.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,983
- And1: 2,370
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I don't see the Bulls settling for so little. If they did this it makes no sense to resign DeRozan who is a win now before he turns 36 years old because Grant Williams may start but his stats aren't an upgrade from what the Bulls have gotten from Patrick Williams, Alex Caruso and Javonte Green at the 4.
I also don't imagine CHA thinking Ball, a resigned Bridges and Lavine make for a surprising jump in wins or helping Miller and Williams be bigger contributors.
I also don't imagine CHA thinking Ball, a resigned Bridges and Lavine make for a surprising jump in wins or helping Miller and Williams be bigger contributors.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,418
- And1: 98,333
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
I don't really like it for either, but I mean that's Zach LaVine for you. I think this is actually a pretty good look at what a LaVine deal looks like and Charlotte is probably the most likely destination unless a desperate Lakers team talks themselves into him.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,092
- And1: 13,668
- Joined: Jun 10, 2023
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
Texas Chuck wrote:I don't really like it for either, but I mean that's Zach LaVine for you. I think this is actually a pretty good look at what a LaVine deal looks like and Charlotte is probably the most likely destination unless a desperate Lakers team talks themselves into him.
Depends on what we do with Bridges.
If he walks in FA then yeah we might be the favorites. If not I just don't see a fit with Bridges returning. That's a lot of scoring and no defense.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
- MasterIchiro
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,388
- And1: 6,845
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
- Location: The Dirty Water
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
Only one basketball.
Miles has averaged 20. LaMelo has averaged 20. Miller looks like a primary scorer and averaged 17 as a rookie. I think these 3 are fine as scoring options 1-2-3, providing enough firepower so that you're paying a boatload to LaVine for a marginal uptick in overall scoring. And you're paying Miles way too much money to be your 4th option.
Grant Williams is also captain of the defense and clubhouse leader. Martin is best perimeter defender on the team.
Borh players hold positive value on their small contracts. LaVine s massive deal holds neutral value at best.
Pass.
I don't want to rule out all trades between them because the Bulls are rumored to want to move up for Donovan Clingan who could fall to 6 where Charlotte already has Mark Williams.
I consider Clingan as a top-3 talent. So I'd charge a premium to Chicago on top of pick 11.
Miles has averaged 20. LaMelo has averaged 20. Miller looks like a primary scorer and averaged 17 as a rookie. I think these 3 are fine as scoring options 1-2-3, providing enough firepower so that you're paying a boatload to LaVine for a marginal uptick in overall scoring. And you're paying Miles way too much money to be your 4th option.
Grant Williams is also captain of the defense and clubhouse leader. Martin is best perimeter defender on the team.
Borh players hold positive value on their small contracts. LaVine s massive deal holds neutral value at best.
Pass.
I don't want to rule out all trades between them because the Bulls are rumored to want to move up for Donovan Clingan who could fall to 6 where Charlotte already has Mark Williams.
I consider Clingan as a top-3 talent. So I'd charge a premium to Chicago on top of pick 11.
It has been written...
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,844
- And1: 35,928
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
MasterIchiro wrote:Only one basketball.
Miles has averaged 20. LaMelo has averaged 20. Miller looks like a primary scorer and averaged 17 as a rookie. I think these 3 are fine as scoring options 1-2-3, providing enough firepower so that you're paying a boatload to LaVine for a marginal uptick in overall scoring. And you're paying Miles way too much money to be your 4th option.
Grant Williams is also captain of the defense and clubhouse leader. Martin is best perimeter defender on the team.
Borh players hold positive value on their small contracts. LaVine s massive deal holds neutral value at best.
Pass.
I don't want to rule out all trades between them because the Bulls are rumored to want to move up for Donovan Clingan who could fall to 6 where Charlotte already has Mark Williams.
I consider Clingan as a top-3 talent. So I'd charge a premium to Chicago on top of pick 11.
I don't think anyone has Grant Williams as a positive value contract. I think a big reason the Hornets got the pick they did for PJ is Mavs realized they made a mistake by signing him to that deal.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
MasterIchiro wrote:
Grant Williams is also captain of the defense and clubhouse leader. Martin is best perimeter defender on the team.
Someone is the captain of the defense, doesn't make them a positive value player.
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,897
- And1: 1,916
- Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Re: Charlotte - Chicago
jbk1234 wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:Only one basketball.
Miles has averaged 20. LaMelo has averaged 20. Miller looks like a primary scorer and averaged 17 as a rookie. I think these 3 are fine as scoring options 1-2-3, providing enough firepower so that you're paying a boatload to LaVine for a marginal uptick in overall scoring. And you're paying Miles way too much money to be your 4th option.
Grant Williams is also captain of the defense and clubhouse leader. Martin is best perimeter defender on the team.
Borh players hold positive value on their small contracts. LaVine s massive deal holds neutral value at best.
Pass.
I don't want to rule out all trades between them because the Bulls are rumored to want to move up for Donovan Clingan who could fall to 6 where Charlotte already has Mark Williams.
I consider Clingan as a top-3 talent. So I'd charge a premium to Chicago on top of pick 11.
I don't think anyone has Grant Williams as a positive value contract. I think a big reason the Hornets got the pick they did for PJ is Mavs realized they made a mistake by signing him to that deal.
Really?
Because he had his best overall year in the nba last year. His contract is small. After coming to the Hornets he averaged 14 pts on 62% true shooting in the last 29 games. Seems like a good deal for 14 mil per year or whatever.
A lot was made about him not playing well in Dallas, but it wasn't that big a deviation from who he has been his whole career. You hear he didn't make his 3s but he shot 37% from 3 in Dallas.
Return to Trades and Transactions