RealGM

If you as the fans of teams that might want Caruso what would you offer for him?

Just interested in what offers would be out there!

#16

Connaughton + #23 + 2nd(s)

Maybe #16 but I think it's some contributing player short, realizing PHIL has no players to spare.

No to Conaughton. He's a very effective limited role player surrounded by stars so he's rarely guarded, he'd have to be a two way, multi way contributor on a team with no stars where he'd have to get his own shot a lot. Plus he's replacing a guard with a guard and makes as much as AC

I like the idea of the Lakers with #17 and Jaxson Hayes opting in, or JHS or Vanderbilt

As a LAL fan, If Hayes opts in, I would gladly send #17 + Hayes to CHI with Caruso going to PHI and #16 coming back to LAL.

DNP-Old wrote:As a LAL fan, If Hayes opts in, I would gladly send #17 + Hayes to CHI with Caruso going to PHI and #16 coming back to LAL.

Huh? You don't get to move up for nothing.

Mavs would have to be very interested...how about the expiration of veteran THJ along with the 1 round prospect, 6'8 defensive oriented forward and all the physical tools..O-Max and an FRP of 25

ChettheJet wrote:Maybe #16 but I think it's some contributing player short, realizing PHIL has no players to spare.

No to Conaughton. He's a very effective limited role player surrounded by stars so he's rarely guarded, he'd have to be a two way, multi way contributor on a team with no stars where he'd have to get his own shot a lot. Plus he's replacing a guard with a guard and makes as much as AC

I like the idea of the Lakers with #17 and Jaxson Hayes opting in, or JHS or Vanderbilt

Is 16+Paul Reed better than just 16?

Colbinii wrote:

DNP-Old wrote:As a LAL fan, If Hayes opts in, I would gladly send #17 + Hayes to CHI with Caruso going to PHI and #16 coming back to LAL.

Huh? You don't get to move up for nothing.

Just trying to give everyone what they want. I'm a giver.

DNP-Old wrote:

Colbinii wrote:

DNP-Old wrote:As a LAL fan, If Hayes opts in, I would gladly send #17 + Hayes to CHI with Caruso going to PHI and #16 coming back to LAL.

Huh? You don't get to move up for nothing.

Just trying to give everyone what they want. I'm a giver.

"I'm a giver"

Proposes trade where Lakers steal value for nothing.

Colbinii wrote:

DNP-Old wrote:

Colbinii wrote:
Huh? You don't get to move up for nothing.

Just trying to give everyone what they want. I'm a giver.

"I'm a giver"

Proposes trade where Lakers steal value for nothing.

Did I not give them both what they wanted? Perhaps you should work on your sense of humor.

ChettheJet wrote:Maybe #16 but I think it's some contributing player short, realizing PHIL has no players to spare.

No to Conaughton. He's a very effective limited role player surrounded by stars so he's rarely guarded, he'd have to be a two way, multi way contributor on a team with no stars where he'd have to get his own shot a lot. Plus he's replacing a guard with a guard and makes as much as AC

I like the idea of the Lakers with #17 and Jaxson Hayes opting in, or JHS or Vanderbilt

What if Philly adds Paul Reed? I think Reed + 16 is a good deal for the bulls

balsamic_ducks wrote:

ChettheJet wrote:Maybe #16 but I think it's some contributing player short, realizing PHIL has no players to spare.

No to Conaughton. He's a very effective limited role player surrounded by stars so he's rarely guarded, he'd have to be a two way, multi way contributor on a team with no stars where he'd have to get his own shot a lot. Plus he's replacing a guard with a guard and makes as much as AC

I like the idea of the Lakers with #17 and Jaxson Hayes opting in, or JHS or Vanderbilt

What if Philly adds Paul Reed? I think Reed + 16 for Caruso is a good deal for the bulls

Done.

DNP-Old wrote:

Colbinii wrote:

DNP-Old wrote:Just trying to give everyone what they want. I'm a giver.

"I'm a giver"

Proposes trade where Lakers steal value for nothing.

Did I not give them both what they wanted? Perhaps you should work on your sense of humor.

What's the joke?

Caruso to Dallas
Boucher and 2025 Dallas first to Chicago
THJ and Toronto 2nd to Toronto

Keep trying.

Pacers should bid but I don't know that we're willing to give up what the Bulls would want. Nesmith has the right sized contract but he's the closest thing we have to a defensive 3. Do the Bulls have a wing sized wing they could add?

slos wrote:Connaughton + #23 + 2nd(s)

Caruso makes more than Connaughton. By salary matching at over 100%, Milwaukee hard caps themselves at the first apron for this offseason and all of next season. Unfortunately, Milwaukee is already $8.8m over the first apron, so they can’t legally do this trade. They could add in more salary and aggregate, but then they hard cap themselves at the second apron, which they’re dangerously close to.

Wizop wrote:Pacers should bid but I don't know that we're willing to give up what the Bulls would want. Nesmith has the right sized contract but he's the closest thing we have to a defensive 3. Do the Bulls have a wing sized wing they could add?

Basically just Torrey Craig, if he opts in?

DNP-Old wrote:

Colbinii wrote:

DNP-Old wrote:Just trying to give everyone what they want. I'm a giver.

"I'm a giver"

Proposes trade where Lakers steal value for nothing.

Did I not give them both what they wanted? Perhaps you should work on your sense of humor.

They don't really do sarcasm on this board. Used to be you would write in green font to indicate it.