SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Courant
Sophomore
Posts: 163
And1: 188
Joined: Nov 22, 2021
       

SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#1 » by Courant » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:10 pm

As Portland begins rebuilding in the post-Damian Lillard era, the Blazers find themselves at an interesting crossroads. Not only does Portland have some developing prospects -- Scoot Henderson, Shaedon Sharpe plus two lottery picks (Nos. 7 and 14) this season -- but it also has some veteran players who may have value with playoff-caliber teams:

* Deandre Ayton
* Malcolm Brogdon
* Jerami Grant
* Anfernee Simons
* Matisse Thybulle
* Robert Williams III

The Blazers are also in a position no lottery team should be in: the luxury tax and first apron. Ayton, Brogdon, Grant and Simons could combine to earn 80 percent of the team's salary cap.

What realistic trade scenarios would work for both a team with playoff aspirations and Portland? Let's assume Henderson, Sharpe and the lottery picks are untouchable, but everyone else is available.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,872
And1: 7,834
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#2 » by jayjaysee » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:17 pm

Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

But trimming the 6-8 million (IIRC) Portland actually needs to cut isn’t really going to be difficult. Some team will take Thybulle or Williams into their MLE and the work is done. Whatever Portland gets back is okay.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,789
And1: 10,448
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#3 » by Myth » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:34 pm

An additional note to consider is that Portland has 13 of their 15 roster spots filled, and have 4 draft picks, so they’ll have the goal of reducing the roster. This means any trades where Portland receives more players this season than they sent out will have to be worth the headache of follow up trades where they really need to receive less players than they send out.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,357
And1: 9,905
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#4 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:36 pm

I would add Murray, Reath and potentially Walker to the list of guys that should be on the block.

Scoot, Sharpe and Camara w/ Rupert as the wildcard are the only youngsters we should actively try to keep IMO.
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,282
And1: 1,405
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#5 » by cucad8 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:39 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

But trimming the 6-8 million (IIRC) Portland actually needs to cut isn’t really going to be difficult. Some team will take Thybulle or Williams into their MLE and the work is done. Whatever Portland gets back is okay.


I'd be looking at a deal like that with both picks, personally. Can we attach 7 to one of the vets to get to 3, 4, 5? Agreed, attaching one(or more, in both instances) to 14 to get higher. While also trimming salary would be ideal, but beggars can't be choosers.

The difficulty, as always, is finding an agreeable partner ahead of us. Houston is rumored to want to move 3, but I don't see an ideal fit with Portland. Have seen plenty of discussions about as well, but Detroit getting Grant back seems a little weird.

SA at 8, Memphis at 9, and Bulls at 11 also all seem like options.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,789
And1: 10,448
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#6 » by Myth » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:44 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:I would add Murray, Reath and potentially Walker to the list of guys that should be on the block.

Scoot, Sharpe and Camara w/ Rupert as the wildcard are the only youngsters we should actively try to keep IMO.

I seem to like Walker than most. Dude is a hustle with great rebounding from a PF position and the ability to knock down the open 3. I have him as worthy of a late 1st in a future draft as it is. Rupert may be worth keeping simply because his value isn’t very high so we may want to see what he is before including him, but certainly tradable if he is a sticking point.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#7 » by psman2 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:48 pm

cucad8 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

But trimming the 6-8 million (IIRC) Portland actually needs to cut isn’t really going to be difficult. Some team will take Thybulle or Williams into their MLE and the work is done. Whatever Portland gets back is okay.


I'd be looking at a deal like that with both picks, personally. Can we attach 7 to one of the vets to get to 3, 4, 5? Agreed, attaching one(or more, in both instances) to 14 to get higher. While also trimming salary would be ideal, but beggars can't be choosers.

The difficulty, as always, is finding an agreeable partner ahead of us. Houston is rumored to want to move 3, but I don't see an ideal fit with Portland. Have seen plenty of discussions about as well, but Detroit getting Grant back seems a little weird.

SA at 8, Memphis at 9, and Bulls at 11 also all seem like options.


I don't see any vet that Memphis would have interest in from Portland involving the 9th pick. We might look at Rob Williams with something like just taking him into our DPE with no assets involved (after waiving Kennard) or ZWill/Rose/future 2nds (netting 3m in savings for Portland).
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,841
And1: 35,923
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#8 » by jbk1234 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:50 pm

I have Thybulle and Simons as the most moveable pieces. I think Brogdon might be someone's plan C. Grant someone's plan D. So those two can probably be moved later in the summer.

I think moving Ayton requires a special set of circumstances. If Claxton signs with a different team, and Mitchell extends, the Nets might be interested in swapping him for Simmons.

I think moving Timelord requires a desperate team doing something dumb at this point. Even with load management, he may never make it through a season healthy.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,872
And1: 7,834
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#9 » by jayjaysee » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:53 pm

cucad8 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

But trimming the 6-8 million (IIRC) Portland actually needs to cut isn’t really going to be difficult. Some team will take Thybulle or Williams into their MLE and the work is done. Whatever Portland gets back is okay.


I'd be looking at a deal like that with both picks, personally. Can we attach 7 to one of the vets to get to 3, 4, 5? Agreed, attaching one(or more, in both instances) to 14 to get higher. While also trimming salary would be ideal, but beggars can't be choosers.

The difficulty, as always, is finding an agreeable partner ahead of us. Houston is rumored to want to move 3, but I don't see an ideal fit with Portland. Have seen plenty of discussions about as well, but Detroit getting Grant back seems a little weird.

SA at 8, Memphis at 9, and Bulls at 11 also all seem like options.


If you fall in love with a guy, yeah definitely consolidate.

But if you can move up to 11th using Grant, and maybe get your seconds (2025 first back).. feels like a win to me.

I have no idea if it’s terrible or not, but offer Charlotte Simons/Thybulle/14th for 6th and whatever matching salary is required. Think Bertans/Martin is enough if you delay it for the picks to could. And that clears all the tax issues for Portland. And likely get Clingan and one of Matas or Holland?

Assume I’ll be told Simons isn’t worth moving up 8 spots and Salaun at 14 is the same as Matas..
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,978
And1: 2,369
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#10 » by ChettheJet » Fri Jun 14, 2024 4:56 pm

It's more complicated than just shipping guys out. Who do they pick at #7 and where they move up from #14, they would have to clear a lot of veterans w/contracts to ever play either of 2 rookies. they no doubt are stashing #34 and #49 in the G league with so many players.

I already know some frequent PORT posters will hate this. Look you can't accomplish EVERYTHING in a single trade, some trades give you some of this, others give you some of that

Send Ayton, #14 and #40 to the Bulls for Vucevic, #11 and their protected pick back

PORT moves up, they drop a big chunk of salary, they get their pick back so they have the option of trading future picks, if they draft Clingan they don't have to force him into the starting unit

The Bulls don't resign DeRozan so they have room to get Ayton, they move back in the 1st for a kid they probably don't play much anyway, they get a rare for them 2nd round pick

Alternately I'd be happy for the Bulls to just get Robert Williams III, for the same move up and back 3 spots and #40 and their pick back but the Bulls don't really have anybody to send back on the money side if that's what PORT wants to do. Work on adding ano0ther team with picks of young contracts or something
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,575
And1: 13,925
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#11 » by JRoy » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:13 pm

ChettheJet wrote:It's more complicated than just shipping guys out. Who do they pick at #7 and where they move up from #14, they would have to clear a lot of veterans w/contracts to ever play either of 2 rookies. they no doubt are stashing #34 and #49 in the G league with so many players.

I already know some frequent PORT posters will hate this. Look you can't accomplish EVERYTHING in a single trade, some trades give you some of this, others give you some of that

Send Ayton, #14 and #40 to the Bulls for Vucevic, #11 and their protected pick back

PORT moves up, they drop a big chunk of salary, they get their pick back so they have the option of trading future picks, if they draft Clingan they don't have to force him into the starting unit

The Bulls don't resign DeRozan so they have room to get Ayton, they move back in the 1st for a kid they probably don't play much anyway, they get a rare for them 2nd round pick

Alternately I'd be happy for the Bulls to just get Robert Williams III, for the same move up and back 3 spots and #40 and their pick back but the Bulls don't really have anybody to send back on the money side if that's what PORT wants to do. Work on adding ano0ther team with picks of young contracts or something


Take #40 out and it works for me.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,781
And1: 14,056
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#12 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:16 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

.


Heartily agree. With teams like Sacramento, okc, Chicago, and Memphis within a free spots, and all those teams probably harboring some caliber of playoff hopes, there’s seems to be some matchups there.
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,282
And1: 1,405
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#13 » by cucad8 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:18 pm

ChettheJet wrote:
Send Ayton, #14 and #40 to the Bulls for Vucevic, #11 and their protected pick back

PORT moves up, they drop a big chunk of salary, they get their pick back so they have the option of trading future picks, if they draft Clingan they don't have to force him into the starting unit

Alternately I'd be happy for the Bulls to just get Robert Williams III, for the same move up and back 3 spots and #40 and their pick back but the Bulls don't really have anybody to send back on the money side if that's what PORT wants to do. Work on adding ano0ther team with picks of young contracts or something


I'd do both of these as a Portland fan. The RWIII one is an easy no brainer.

I don't know what Portland thinks of Ayton, if they view him as a legit part of a young core, or if it was more, knowing we were tanking let's see if we could get him to put up big stats and flip him for more than we gave up for him. Either way, there's a few Cs I'm intrigued with in the draft, and Vucevic would be a great stopgap option at a cheaper price that would seem less likely to pout about a young guy getting picked in the lotto.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,781
And1: 14,056
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#14 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:27 pm

psman2 wrote:
cucad8 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

But trimming the 6-8 million (IIRC) Portland actually needs to cut isn’t really going to be difficult. Some team will take Thybulle or Williams into their MLE and the work is done. Whatever Portland gets back is okay.


I'd be looking at a deal like that with both picks, personally. Can we attach 7 to one of the vets to get to 3, 4, 5? Agreed, attaching one(or more, in both instances) to 14 to get higher. While also trimming salary would be ideal, but beggars can't be choosers.

The difficulty, as always, is finding an agreeable partner ahead of us. Houston is rumored to want to move 3, but I don't see an ideal fit with Portland. Have seen plenty of discussions about as well, but Detroit getting Grant back seems a little weird.

SA at 8, Memphis at 9, and Bulls at 11 also all seem like options.


I don't see any vet that Memphis would have interest in from Portland involving the 9th pick. We might look at Rob Williams with something like just taking him into our DPE with no assets involved (after waiving Kennard) or ZWill/Rose/future 2nds (netting 3m in savings for Portland).



DPE’s expire March 10 for any season. Though you should have TPE’s that work, and I’m guessing this was a phone autocorrect?
kristov
Junior
Posts: 365
And1: 103
Joined: Jul 03, 2005

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#15 » by kristov » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:31 pm

The only trade I would do as a Bulls Fan would be 7 for 11 which means no chance.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#16 » by psman2 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:35 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
psman2 wrote:
cucad8 wrote:
I'd be looking at a deal like that with both picks, personally. Can we attach 7 to one of the vets to get to 3, 4, 5? Agreed, attaching one(or more, in both instances) to 14 to get higher. While also trimming salary would be ideal, but beggars can't be choosers.

The difficulty, as always, is finding an agreeable partner ahead of us. Houston is rumored to want to move 3, but I don't see an ideal fit with Portland. Have seen plenty of discussions about as well, but Detroit getting Grant back seems a little weird.

SA at 8, Memphis at 9, and Bulls at 11 also all seem like options.


I don't see any vet that Memphis would have interest in from Portland involving the 9th pick. We might look at Rob Williams with something like just taking him into our DPE with no assets involved (after waiving Kennard) or ZWill/Rose/future 2nds (netting 3m in savings for Portland).



DPE’s expire March 10 for any season. Though you should have TPE’s that work, and I’m guessing this was a phone autocorrect?


Brain fart...TPE....interesting fact I read was Memphis (any team that wasn't already in the apron) can still use their TPE until the end of this month and not trigger the 1st Apron restrictions. So if we willing to spend a bunch of taxes we could zoom past the 1st apron still I believe.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,781
And1: 14,056
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#17 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:37 pm

psman2 wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
psman2 wrote:
I don't see any vet that Memphis would have interest in from Portland involving the 9th pick. We might look at Rob Williams with something like just taking him into our DPE with no assets involved (after waiving Kennard) or ZWill/Rose/future 2nds (netting 3m in savings for Portland).



DPE’s expire March 10 for any season. Though you should have TPE’s that work, and I’m guessing this was a phone autocorrect?


Brain fart...TPE....interesting fact I read was Memphis (any team that wasn't already in the apron) can still use their TPE until the end of this month and not trigger the 1st Apron restrictions. So if we willing to spend a bunch of taxes we could zoom past the 1st apron still I believe.



Shouldn’t. The restriction kicked in as of the day after the end of the regular season. And any actions taken as of “the day after the end of the regular season” triggers any related cap/apron restrictions for the remainder of that offseason and the following season.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,357
And1: 9,905
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#18 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:41 pm

I strongly believe that a team that swings and misses either in FA or in the trade market for a needle mover will revert to seeing Jerami Grant as a competent consolation prize. Guys his size, with his athleticism and shooting are in demand around the league - even with his contract.

I can certainly see PHI swing and miss on PG13 and turn to Jerami Grant for a future lotto protected FRP. I am of mind that if they swing and miss they cant punt to 2025, they need to do something this offseason and while not on the level of PG13, a guy like Grant fits that team MUCH better than, say, DDR.

I also think Simons to ORL is a ideal fit and could have actual legs.

So, basically, I am seeing something like -

Grant into PHI cap space for a future LP FRP.
Simons into ORL cap space for #18 and the lower of their 2025 FRP.

That leaves PDX with picks 7, 14, 18, 34 and 40. Obviously a consolidation of some sort would have to take place. I personally would like to come out of the draft with Matas, Edey and Tyler Smith. Not sure how that happens.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,781
And1: 14,056
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#19 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:41 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
psman2 wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:

DPE’s expire March 10 for any season. Though you should have TPE’s that work, and I’m guessing this was a phone autocorrect?


Brain fart...TPE....interesting fact I read was Memphis (any team that wasn't already in the apron) can still use their TPE until the end of this month and not trigger the 1st Apron restrictions. So if we willing to spend a bunch of taxes we could zoom past the 1st apron still I believe.



Shouldn’t. The restriction kicked in as of the day after the end of the regular season. And any actions taken as of “the day after the end of the regular season” triggers any related cap/apron restrictions for the remainder of that offseason and the following season.



A team that engages in any of the trade transactions described under the First and Second Apron Level rules above after the last day of the Regular Season of a Salary Cap Year will be unable to subsequently have a Team Salary that exceeds the applicable Apron level for the remainder of the then-current Salary Cap Year as well as for the immediately following Salary Cap Year. (Notwithstanding this general rule, there will be certain transition rules applicable to trade transactions occurring during the period from the day after the last day of the 2023-24 Regular Season through June 30, 2024.)


Though, seeing this description, there’s a chance this might be a transition for just this offseason? When I get back home, I’ll check the full CBA.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,457
And1: 2,207
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: SELLER'S MARKET: Portland TrailBlazers 

Post#20 » by Norm2953 » Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:45 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Portland should be trying to trade 14th+one of the vets to move up a few spots and trim a bit of salary.

.


Heartily agree. With teams like Sacramento, okc, Chicago, and Memphis within a free spots, and all those teams probably harboring some caliber of playoff hopes, there’s seems to be some matchups there.


Should be doable, especially if Portland is targeting one of the guys they have worked out like Knecht, Holland,
Salaun or Cody Williams. They can draft one of these guys at 7 and perhaps would prefer adding one more as
opposed to drafting the next group of guys at 14.

Personally I would simply draft one of these guys at 7 (if Clingan is not there at 7) and draft Edey at 14 and not bother
with trading up but who knows what Portland is looking for?

Return to Trades and Transactions