1 for 1 for 1 - DAL | POR | MEM

Syko_boB · Post #1 » by **Syko_boB** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 2:58 am

Dallas:

SF/SG Josh Green for PF/C Brandon Clarke

Reinforce their big man alliance with another strong roll man who's game can expand playing off of Ky & Lu

LIVELY - CLARKE - WASHINGTON - DONCIC - IRVING

Portland:

C Robert Williams III for SF/SG Josh Green

Move their backup big for a young plug n play wing who should be around for a while

AYTON - GRANT - GREEN - BROGDON - SIMONS

Memphis:

PF/C Brandon Clarke for C Robert Williams III

Create a scary duo down low for any opponent, improving rebounding and creating more outlets & fastbreaks for Ja

WILLIAMS III - JACKSON JR - BANE - SMART - MORANT

Myth · Post #2 » by **Myth** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 3:04 am

Blazers cut Dallas out and take Brandon Clarke for themselves if Memphis is willing to do that swap.

Colbinii · Post #3 » by **Colbinii** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 3:11 am

Myth wrote:Blazers cut Dallas out and take Brandon Clarke for themselves if Memphis is willing to do that swap.

Yup.

The trick to these 1 for 1 for 1 trades is there is always a player worth the least. Green is that player here.

Myth · Post #4 » by **Myth** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 3:13 am

Colbinii wrote:
Myth wrote:Blazers cut Dallas out and take Brandon Clarke for themselves if Memphis is willing to do that swap.

Yup.

The trick to these 1 for 1 for 1 trades is there is always a player worth the least. Green is that player here.

Also fit. Blazers have too many guards currently and lack PFs and Cs.

Post #5 » by **Texas Chuck** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 4:28 am

Dallas would want to be cut out. I have zero issues with Green having the least trade value but he definitely has more on court utility than Clarke would for Dallas.

QMemphis · Post #6 » by **QMemphis** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:35 am

Don’t see us moving Clarke he is our 3rd big with great continuity with our core 3. Timelord is a great fit but due to his health we can’t take a chance on him.

daoneandonly · Post #7 » by **daoneandonly** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 7:26 pm

I would do it for Dallas, which means it probably needs incentive which the Mavs should not part with.

I was a fan of Clark when he came out of college. He's not great by any means, but less erratic than Green

psman2 · Post #8 » by **psman2** » Sat Jun 15, 2024 7:32 pm

QMemphis wrote:Don’t see us moving Clarke he is our 3rd big with great continuity with our core 3. Timelord is a great fit but due to his health we can’t take a chance on him.

Yep not moving Clarke here, but I think we might still look at Timelord with filler/2nd or TPE/MLE. The downside is that we would still need to get a 4th big due to his health, and likely that big won't have a shot either. So between Clarke, RWill, and a required 4th big we won't have much shooting in the front court. That is why I don't think we are going to prioritize the hurt non-shooters heavily like RWill and MRob.

Astaluego · Post #9 » by **Astaluego** » Sun Jun 16, 2024 7:58 pm

The lack of respect for J.Green on this board is crazy, he is a player of energy and intangibles...the statistics say that the Mavs are much better with him on the court...there is a reason why the Hornets They wanted him in the PJ trade and there's a reason the Mavs didn't send him.