Ingram to Sacramento

Jkam31 · Post #1 » by **Jkam31** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 8:12 am

Sacramento out: Barnes, Huerter, 2027 first
Sacramento in: Ingram

NO out: Ingram
NO in: Ayton/Barnes

Portland out: Ayton
Portland in: Barnes, Colby jones, 2027 Sacramento first

Sacramento: get a go to scorer to go with fox and are locked in to a very good core fox, ellis, Carter, monk, ingram, Keegan, and Sabonis

NO: Get a center who can shoot midrange as well as a backup foward

Portland: Get a first and out of Austin’s contract

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=XHl6MkQyOm3Zbk1mBBrooA

Whole Truth · Post #2 » by **Whole Truth** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:30 pm

IMO trading BI in division to direct competition for picks where NO's want to contend requires a trade tax.

Finding a 3rd team to provide value is my thing. Ayton is not an ideal target for BI to improve the Kings.

bpcox05 · Post #3 » by **bpcox05** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 2:18 pm

Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

OGSactownballer · Post #4 » by **OGSactownballer** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 2:58 pm

bpcox05 wrote:Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

Second all this and add the fact that Ingram rarely stays healthy for more than his 51 games/season average and your are betting on a very long shot based on name.

Kalamazoo317 · Post #5 » by **Kalamazoo317** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 3:18 pm

Looks like Barnes managed to get traded to two teams there

Euphonetiks · Post #6 » by **Euphonetiks** » Sat Jun 29, 2024 3:53 pm

OGSactownballer wrote:
bpcox05 wrote:Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

Second all this and add the fact that Ingram rarely stays healthy for more than his 51 games/season average and your are betting on a very long shot based on name.

Ingram has played more than 51 games in 7 of his 8 seasons played in his career. He’s not the most durable, but the exaggeration on here gets to be over the top.