RealGM

Sacramento out: Barnes, Huerter, 2027 first
Sacramento in: Ingram

NO out: Ingram
NO in: Ayton/Barnes

Portland out: Ayton
Portland in: Barnes, Colby jones, 2027 Sacramento first

Sacramento: get a go to scorer to go with fox and are locked in to a very good core fox, ellis, Carter, monk, ingram, Keegan, and Sabonis

NO: Get a center who can shoot midrange as well as a backup foward

Portland: Get a first and out of Austin’s contract





?s=46&t=XHl6MkQyOm3Zbk1mBBrooA

IMO trading BI in division to direct competition for picks where NO's want to contend requires a trade tax.

Finding a 3rd team to provide value is my thing. Ayton is not an ideal target for BI to improve the Kings.

Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

bpcox05 wrote:Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

Second all this and add the fact that Ingram rarely stays healthy for more than his 51 games/season average and your are betting on a very long shot based on name.

Looks like Barnes managed to get traded to two teams there

OGSactownballer wrote:

bpcox05 wrote:Not a fan of Ingram on the Kings.

His offense mainly comes from 0-16ft which isn’t an ideal fit with the way Fox and Sabonis attack/score.

He also forces Murray to play PF which isn’t ideal considering Sabonis’ lack of length. I’d prefer to keep Murray’s size/length at SF and find a stronger/longer player to play PF.

Second all this and add the fact that Ingram rarely stays healthy for more than his 51 games/season average and your are betting on a very long shot based on name.

Ingram has played more than 51 games in 7 of his 8 seasons played in his career. He’s not the most durable, but the exaggeration on here gets to be over the top.