Hawks get
Kenrich and two seconds
OKC gets
Nance Jr.
Hawks save a bit more more and pick up minor assets
OKC gets a backup big that gives them some size.
ATL/Thunder follow up
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,477
- And1: 1,929
- Joined: Apr 11, 2017
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,265
- And1: 12,915
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
Dn4sty wrote:Hawks get
Kenrich and two seconds
OKC gets
Nance Jr.
Hawks save a bit more more and pick up minor assets
OKC gets a backup big that gives them some size.
Hawks still need size at PF and C....at least until the Capela situation is sorted.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,406
- And1: 98,287
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
Not sure Nance is worth more than Williams. Makes more money and his contract expires. Don't believe OKC owes incentive here.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
Dn4sty wrote:Hawks get
Kenrich and two seconds
OKC gets
Nance Jr.
I really like this without the 2nds. In the past, Thunder fans were hesitant to move Kenrich, though.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
jayu70 wrote:Dn4sty wrote:Hawks still need size at PF and C....at least until the Capela situation is sorted.
Well, the idea is that Capela would stay. They wouldn't need size in that case.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
I think OKC just taking Nance into cap space is the deal here. Atlanta get breathing room under the tax and OKC gets a backup rotation quality big.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
psman2 wrote:I think OKC just taking Nance into cap space is the deal here. Atlanta get breathing room under the tax and OKC gets a backup rotation quality big.
Then put those 2nds back in.

Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,265
- And1: 12,915
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
raleigh wrote:jayu70 wrote:Dn4sty wrote:Hawks still need size at PF and C....at least until the Capela situation is sorted.
Well, the idea is that Capela would stay. They wouldn't need size in that case.
Rumors are Hawks are still looking to move Capela.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,412
- And1: 1,553
- Joined: Nov 28, 2017
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
I think Nance will backup OO once they flip CC. He could have more value at the deadline for a playoff push team needing inside help ala Sixers.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,830
- And1: 35,917
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
I really don't know what the Hawks are trying to do. They just declined Bey's Q.O. (which I agree with), but I'd need to know what the hopeful gain would be from dumping Nance. Are they still trying to win this season? Is there something they can do with the cap space?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,265
- And1: 12,915
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
jbk1234 wrote:I really don't know what the Hawks are trying to do. They just declined Bey's Q.O. (which I agree with), but I'd need to know what the hopeful gain would be from dumping Nance. Are they still trying to win this season? Is there something they can do with the cap space?
Bey is most likely out fir the year with an ACL injury. His QO was $8 million which would push them close to the 2nd apron.
Yes, they are still trying to win so no need to dump Nance.
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,294
- And1: 604
- Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Re: ATL/Thunder follow up
jbk1234 wrote:Are they still trying to win this season?
Yes. I think they'll move one of Nance/Capela for someone to replace the role that Bey filled.
Return to Trades and Transactions