Cleveland/New Orleans
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Cleveland/New Orleans
Cleveland: Allen
New Orleans: Murphy and Jones
Cleveland: Get more floor spacing
New Orleans: Get a big they need in the middle
New Orleans: Murphy and Jones
Cleveland: Get more floor spacing
New Orleans: Get a big they need in the middle
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,823
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Cavs aren't getting Murphy and Jones for Allen. I'd want Murphy, but Griffin will only trade him if they can't agree on an extension and Ingram decides to take less to stay N.O.
I'm amenable to trading Allen and LeVert's expiring if Ingram is will extend at a number in the $36-42M range, but if he's insisting on a full max, I'd be out.
I'm amenable to trading Allen and LeVert's expiring if Ingram is will extend at a number in the $36-42M range, but if he's insisting on a full max, I'd be out.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,400
- And1: 98,272
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
jbk is right. Pels aren't giving you two young, affordable wings for the center you'd prefer to move. I know there has been lots of deals proposed between these two teams but I don't really see a fit. Pels shouldn't give up the young wings and Cleveland shouldn't want Ingram.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 428
- And1: 321
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
the only reason we want to move Ingram in the first place is to let Murphy start and you sure as hell won't be getting Herb
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,823
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
hsfolk wrote:the only reason we want to move Ingram in the first place is to let Murphy start and you sure as hell won't be getting Herb
You may want to prepare yourself on the Herb front
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,159
- And1: 2,497
- Joined: Jul 22, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
haha, sign me up for Murphy and Herb for allen. I'd be happy with either/or
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,451
- And1: 104
- Joined: Jan 20, 2002
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
bgrep14 wrote:Cleveland: Allen
New Orleans: Murphy and Jones
Cleveland: Get more floor spacing
New Orleans: Get a big they need in the middle
Murphy and Jones for Allen? Not a chance.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Cleveland says yes--obviously.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
jbk1234 wrote:hsfolk wrote:the only reason we want to move Ingram in the first place is to let Murphy start and you sure as hell won't be getting Herb
You may want to prepare yourself on the Herb front
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,598
- And1: 6,242
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
This is an absolutely WILD overpay by New Orleans. I doubt Allen could pull Murphy OR Herb without Cleveland adding some incentive. Both is highway robbery.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,823
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Whole Truth wrote:jbk1234 wrote:hsfolk wrote:the only reason we want to move Ingram in the first place is to let Murphy start and you sure as hell won't be getting Herb
You may want to prepare yourself on the Herb front
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded now should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
jbk1234 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
You may want to prepare yourself on the Herb front
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded now should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
I'd assume that's why no trade was done. It was also rumored Hawks wanted him for Murray at the deadline, reason that trade wasn't done either. Why, Daniels not Herb went with the Lakers pick for Murray this offseason.
From NO's side, it was then supposedly Jonas expiring filler, with Herb rumored as the player value. Now BI not Jonas is the value being offered up. Adding Herb's value to BI for a defensive rim runner makes no sense for NO's. They would be creating a hole to half way fill another because Allen would be a less than ideal fit with Zion offensively.
Herb was shooting the ball better more consistently than Murphy down the stretch run. His 40% shooting looked very sustainable.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,823
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Whole Truth wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded now should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
I'd assume that's why no trade was done. It was also rumored Hawks wanted him for Murray at the deadline, reason that trade wasn't done either. Why, Daniels not Herb went with the Lakers pick for Murray this offseason.
From NO's side, it was than supposedly Jonas expiring filler, with Herb rumored as the player value. Now BI not Jonas is the value being offered up. Adding Herb's value to BI for a defensive rim runner makes no sense for NO's. They would be creating a hole to half way fill another because Allen would be a less than ideal fit with Zion offensively.
The problem with offering up BI are his extension expectations. The Cavs don't want to hand him a max deal anymore than the Pelicans do and that's not something that can be fixed by tinkering with value. It's the threshold issue. Ingram either comes off that, or not. It's not something the Cavs or Pelicans can control.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
jbk1234 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
I'd assume that's why no trade was done. It was also rumored Hawks wanted him for Murray at the deadline, reason that trade wasn't done either. Why, Daniels not Herb went with the Lakers pick for Murray this offseason.
From NO's side, it was than supposedly Jonas expiring filler, with Herb rumored as the player value. Now BI not Jonas is the value being offered up. Adding Herb's value to BI for a defensive rim runner makes no sense for NO's. They would be creating a hole to half way fill another because Allen would be a less than ideal fit with Zion offensively.
The problem with offering up BI are his extension expectations. The Cavs don't want to hand him a max deal anymore than the Pelicans do and that's not something that can be fixed by tinkering with value. It's the threshold issue. Ingram either comes off that, or not. It's not something the Cavs or Pelicans can control.
I understand & don't disagree with your view on BI.
I'm just saying Herb's chance of being traded is very slim to none
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
JBK who are yours/Cavs rumored player interest outside of BI ?
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,823
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Whole Truth wrote:JBK who are yours/Cavs rumored player interest outside of BI ?
I believe Altman when he says the plan is to see how this core works with Atkinson. Now, myself, if the Pelicans and Murphy can't come to terms on an extension, and Griffin puts him on the table, I'm trading Allen. If the Spurs season starts ugly, CP3 misses games, and they put Vassell on the table, I'm thinking about moving Garland.
But if you're a top 4 seed that just extended Mitchell, you can't engage in trades where you lose on talent unless some outside factor is at play.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,499
- And1: 477
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
I will upset both teams and easily/willingly trade both Mobleys for Murphy and Jones. I think it works better for both teams.
I am just not high on Mobley ever being more than what he currently is - a real, real good defensive PF that cannot shoot.
I am just not high on Mobley ever being more than what he currently is - a real, real good defensive PF that cannot shoot.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,451
- And1: 104
- Joined: Jan 20, 2002
-
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
jbk1234 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
You may want to prepare yourself on the Herb front
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded now should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
I can guarantee you Herb was NEVER on the table for Allen. Cleveland would have jumped at that in a heart beat if so.
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
PELICANSFAN wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:
You know something ?.
The chances of Herb getting traded now should be reduced even more now that Daniels is gone.
The rumor is that he was on the table for Allen last season, and while I agree that trading Daniels would mean they'd have to replace one or both of them, that shouldn't be difficult. Thybulle is very gettable. The Kings just dumped Mitchell on the Raptors. No offer has been made to Okoro yet. It's just not that difficult to replace guards and wings whose primary value is on the defensive side of the floor.
I can guarantee you Herb was NEVER on the table for Allen. Cleveland would have jumped at that in a heart beat if so.
I worded that poorly. These teams were rumored to be asking for Herb, he was never on the table .
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,814
- And1: 723
- Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Re: Cleveland/New Orleans
Not sure what the big fuss about Jones is...he averaged 11 pts. a game in 30 minutes???!! I know he is a good defender, but Murphy is the big draw. Allen has a lot of value around the league, and I think you would be surprised at what the Cavs would get for him if he becomes available. There isn't a GM in the league who would take Jones even up for Allen.
Return to Trades and Transactions