CHI in: Powell, Tucker, Nnaji, Hyland, 3 DEN 2nds.
CHI out: Lavine, Craig.
Why? Move on from Lavine and get cap relief, Powell who they could move for value and a project in Nnaji. Decent return for an albatross such as Lavine
DEN in: Westbrook, Craig.
DEN out: Nnaji, 3 DEN 2nds.
Why? Get two expirings that can contribute and clear the Nnaji money.
LAC in: Lavine.
LAC out: Powell, Tucker, Westbrook, Hyland.
Why? Get a good offensive player to contribute alongside their top-9. Harden-Lavine-Mann-Leonard-Zubac-Porter-Coffin-Jones-Batum is a good mix of defense/offense and keeps them in the playoff hunt and relevancy.
LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,347
- And1: 612
- Joined: Mar 10, 2020
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,976
- And1: 2,369
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
So what's the Powell trade look like because is LAC has offers for him why don't they move him?
I would have doubts that PJ Tucker even reported to CHI, there is no way he's happy to be joining a reshuffling team
Nnaji the project is older than Julian Phillips the 2nd round pick they bought last year and this year's #11 pick Matas Buzellis and that's figuring they do actually move Patrick Williams to the SF. Now you explain it slowly how and why they are developing Nnaji.
Bones Hyland would maybe end up as the backup SG because he's a shooter but is his defense good enough to keep him on the floor?
Monumentally bad for the Bulls to take back scraps when they could just keep and start Lavine
I would have doubts that PJ Tucker even reported to CHI, there is no way he's happy to be joining a reshuffling team
Nnaji the project is older than Julian Phillips the 2nd round pick they bought last year and this year's #11 pick Matas Buzellis and that's figuring they do actually move Patrick Williams to the SF. Now you explain it slowly how and why they are developing Nnaji.
Bones Hyland would maybe end up as the backup SG because he's a shooter but is his defense good enough to keep him on the floor?
Monumentally bad for the Bulls to take back scraps when they could just keep and start Lavine
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,967
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
this puts clippers above 1st apron
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,931
- And1: 5,346
- Joined: Mar 02, 2013
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
The Nugs are not trading 3 2nds for Westbrook and Craig. Do they even have 2nds to trade?
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,490
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
Godaddycurse wrote:this puts clippers above 1st apron
Really?
I can see this putting Clippers $2m under 1st apron
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,967
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
zimpy27 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:this puts clippers above 1st apron
Really?
I can see this putting Clippers $2m under 1st apron
theres 3 roster spot to fill
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,490
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
Godaddycurse wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:this puts clippers above 1st apron
Really?
I can see this putting Clippers $2m under 1st apron
theres 3 roster spot to fill
That's legal though isn't it? 12 man roster minimum? Or is the minimum higher now?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,967
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
zimpy27 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
Really?
I can see this putting Clippers $2m under 1st apron
theres 3 roster spot to fill
That's legal though isn't it? 12 man roster minimum? Or is the minimum higher now?
minimum is 14. i think u didnt count dunn's deal either in the current numbers on spotrac
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,490
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
Godaddycurse wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
theres 3 roster spot to fill
That's legal though isn't it? 12 man roster minimum? Or is the minimum higher now?
minimum is 14. i think u didnt count dunn's deal either in the current numbers on spotrac
Oh 14, ok then yeah probably needs Mann outgoing instead of Hyland
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,339
- And1: 4,265
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: LAC-DEN-CHI: Lavine for depth, Russ to DEN
Not sure how it would work, but could this deal include Det?
Bulls get Hardaway Jr, Tucker and another salary
Det gets Powell and two seconds from Chi
Clips give Lavine
Den gets Westbrook
Clips add Lavine to Leonard and Harden-interesting
Chi gets expirings
Det adds Powell, who's better than Hardaway
Den gets Westbrook
Bulls get Hardaway Jr, Tucker and another salary
Det gets Powell and two seconds from Chi
Clips give Lavine
Den gets Westbrook
Clips add Lavine to Leonard and Harden-interesting
Chi gets expirings
Det adds Powell, who's better than Hardaway
Den gets Westbrook
Return to Trades and Transactions