Cavs: Jerome, Niang, and Lavert
Lakers: Rui, Vincent, and Wood
Lakers save roughly 4 million immediately and gets expirings to potentially open up space for another contract for someone next year while maintaining talent. Lavert can be a very useful 6 man.
Lakers: Rui and Wood give them good stretch backup options that they currently lack. Rui may also be able to play 3. Vincent gives them a backup pg and some vet leadership (they can use him as a contract filler in future trades).
Lakers/Cavs
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Lakers/Cavs
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,659
- And1: 5,065
- Joined: Jan 07, 2012
- Location: Atl
-
Re: Lakers/Cavs
Think both teams turn it down. Cavs essentially using 28 million to get 1.5 or 2 rotation players depending what you think of Gabe.
Would think lakers prefer rui and Vincent to this package. Rui a useful six man. Gabe ideally starts and Dlo plays off bench.
Would think lakers prefer rui and Vincent to this package. Rui a useful six man. Gabe ideally starts and Dlo plays off bench.
Re: Lakers/Cavs
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,818
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Lakers/Cavs
No way Cavs take back Vincent. If the Lakers want off of Rui's future money, we can just send them LeVert, but even that probably doesn't happen unless we know what's happening with Okoro.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions