Turning kings into contenders
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Turning kings into contenders
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,867
- And1: 5,833
- Joined: Feb 23, 2014
Turning kings into contenders
Kings: Deandre Hunter
Hawks: Huerter, McDaniels, future 1st, and in protecting 2025 1st rounder
Why for Kings: Get a three and D guy with great size who is switchable and young. Hunter can come off the bench untill DD contract is up after next season then after can create a frat foward random with Keegan. Kings would now have four elite defensive wings and guards in fox, ellis, Hunter, and Keegan which enables them to matchup up with anyone. Kings defense was top five starting in March with ellis in the lineup and the corpse of Barnes starting and I believ they played mainly playoff teams. On offense Hunter is very ball dominant so he would fit in nicely with the team.
Fox/monk
Ellis/carter
DD/Hunter
Keegan/lyles
Sabonis/len
I’ll take my chances with this team vs any non Boston team (and Boston could have health problems by June). Fox showed he goes to another level in the playoffs you add in Keegan who should improve in his third season
Why for hawks: Get two first round draft picks and a potential for a fourth of the trade was expanded to a three team after rerouting Huerter. I belive huerters value will go up by the deadline and teams needing shooting will call so Atlanta can get assets for him. Trade also clears space and room for there recent draft picks
Hawks: Huerter, McDaniels, future 1st, and in protecting 2025 1st rounder
Why for Kings: Get a three and D guy with great size who is switchable and young. Hunter can come off the bench untill DD contract is up after next season then after can create a frat foward random with Keegan. Kings would now have four elite defensive wings and guards in fox, ellis, Hunter, and Keegan which enables them to matchup up with anyone. Kings defense was top five starting in March with ellis in the lineup and the corpse of Barnes starting and I believ they played mainly playoff teams. On offense Hunter is very ball dominant so he would fit in nicely with the team.
Fox/monk
Ellis/carter
DD/Hunter
Keegan/lyles
Sabonis/len
I’ll take my chances with this team vs any non Boston team (and Boston could have health problems by June). Fox showed he goes to another level in the playoffs you add in Keegan who should improve in his third season
Why for hawks: Get two first round draft picks and a potential for a fourth of the trade was expanded to a three team after rerouting Huerter. I belive huerters value will go up by the deadline and teams needing shooting will call so Atlanta can get assets for him. Trade also clears space and room for there recent draft picks
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,354
- And1: 9,900
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Hunter isn’t worth this. I would say he and Huertwr are about the same value. Difference may be a few SRP. Certainly not 2 FRP.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,426
- And1: 7,164
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Feels like a significant overpay for the Kings.
Even when he's healthy (and he's often not) Hunter just isn't that good. Adding a low-end starter/good 3rd forward doesn't really turn the Kings into contenders (though if he can stay healthy he would increase their odds of making the playoffs).
For Atlanta the fit is poor - they'd effectively have to move Daniels to SF with a Bogs/Heuter SG combo making their lineup quite poor on defense. With the pick value they should still do it though.
Even when he's healthy (and he's often not) Hunter just isn't that good. Adding a low-end starter/good 3rd forward doesn't really turn the Kings into contenders (though if he can stay healthy he would increase their odds of making the playoffs).
For Atlanta the fit is poor - they'd effectively have to move Daniels to SF with a Bogs/Heuter SG combo making their lineup quite poor on defense. With the pick value they should still do it though.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,966
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Turning kings into contenders
I dont think this elevates them out of the play-in/1st round
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 13,918
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Hunter is always hurt. This is an overpay.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,867
- And1: 5,833
- Joined: Feb 23, 2014
Re: Turning kings into contenders
BlazersBroncos wrote:Hunter isn’t worth this. I would say he and Huertwr are about the same value. Difference may be a few SRP. Certainly not 2 FRP.
giberish wrote:Feels like a significant overpay for the Kings.
Even when he's healthy (and he's often not) Hunter just isn't that good. Adding a low-end starter/good 3rd forward doesn't really turn the Kings into contenders (though if he can stay healthy he would increase their odds of making the playoffs).
For Atlanta the fit is poor - they'd effectively have to move Daniels to SF with a Bogs/Heuter SG combo making their lineup quite poor on defense. With the pick value they should still do it though.
Is Hunter a low end starter I thought he was better than this. Hunter balances out the roster which maximizes the team Hunter being a SF/PF clears space for us to give the guards more playing time. Kings need another big wing defender which Hunter is and ones that can shoot don’t come cheap. I was thinking Cam johnson but to me Hunters size pi’s more valuable
Godaddycurse wrote:I dont think this elevates them out of the play-in/1st round
Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,426
- And1: 7,164
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Jkam31 wrote:BlazersBroncos wrote:Hunter isn’t worth this. I would say he and Huertwr are about the same value. Difference may be a few SRP. Certainly not 2 FRP.giberish wrote:Feels like a significant overpay for the Kings.
Even when he's healthy (and he's often not) Hunter just isn't that good. Adding a low-end starter/good 3rd forward doesn't really turn the Kings into contenders (though if he can stay healthy he would increase their odds of making the playoffs).
For Atlanta the fit is poor - they'd effectively have to move Daniels to SF with a Bogs/Heuter SG combo making their lineup quite poor on defense. With the pick value they should still do it though.
Is Hunter a low end starter I thought he was better than this. Hunter balances out the roster which maximizes the team Hunter being a SF/PF clears space for us to give the guards more playing time. Kings need another big wing defender which Hunter is and ones that can shoot don’t come cheap. I was thinking Cam johnson but to me Hunters size pi’s more valuable
The idea of Hunter has always been better than the reality of Hunter. He's not bad, but he's not really good either. When healthy (and that's been a big if for him) he fills a hole but isn't a positive difference maker.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,966
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Jkam31 wrote:Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Re: Turning kings into contenders
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,486
- And1: 43,629
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Turning kings into contenders
I have Huerter as more valuable than Hunter, so this is confusing
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Turning kings into contenders
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,918
- And1: 2,565
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Turning kings into contenders
May I interest you in some magic beans?
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 3,100
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Godaddycurse wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,966
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Turning kings into contenders
OxAndFox wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Derozan havent exactly been known for playoff success so i stand by my original prediction of play-in/1st rd exit.
Maybe 2nd round If they have HCA but i don't think they will finish above denver/okc/minny/dallas..
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 3,100
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Godaddycurse wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Derozan havent exactly been known for playoff success so i stand by my original prediction of play-in/1st rd exit.
Maybe 2nd round If they have HCA but i don't think they will finish above denver/okc/minny/dallas..
I think with the Kings a wide range of predictions is completely reasonable.
TBH I have huge expectations of this group. If they don't make the WCF I would be shocked if healthy. OKC is the only team I see as a lock for a top 2 spot. The Kings I can see anywhere from 2-8 with the most likely on the higher end. There is plenty of room on the hype bandwagon though so you're welcome to get on board.
Minny is close with OKC and I love their squad TBH. Hard to see them falling off, but Sac had a 2-1 record against them last season so I would expect close battles again, same with OKC at 2-2. They match up relatively well with those teams, unlike those pesky Pelicans.
Was it a sugar hit after the TDL for Dallas?
Denver isn't close to what they were last year and we will see just how much KCP meant to them. They do have the best player in the game though.
Phoenix will obviously be good and will be in that group, as will Memphis and if NOP get a 5 they will be too.
I see that anything can happen between Sac, Mem, NOP, Dal, Den, Minn, Pho and should be 2-8 drawings.
I also won't be surprised if Hou is fighting for a place along with the Spurs.
Don't worry about DDR in the POs. He needs to help get the team there mainly. He will help with the sleepy games the Kings lose like Detroit, Charlotte, Portland.
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,867
- And1: 5,833
- Joined: Feb 23, 2014
Re: Turning kings into contenders
OxAndFox wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Keegan is going into his third year the third year leap is coming last year he went from an average defender to an elite defender so he has shown he can get better as he goes. Keegan ain’t getting traded for anything short of a top 5 player
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,867
- And1: 5,833
- Joined: Feb 23, 2014
Re: Turning kings into contenders
OxAndFox wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:OxAndFox wrote:
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Derozan havent exactly been known for playoff success so i stand by my original prediction of play-in/1st rd exit.
Maybe 2nd round If they have HCA but i don't think they will finish above denver/okc/minny/dallas..
I think with the Kings a wide range of predictions is completely reasonable.
TBH I have huge expectations of this group. If they don't make the WCF I would be shocked if healthy. OKC is the only team I see as a lock for a top 2 spot. The Kings I can see anywhere from 2-8 with the most likely on the higher end. There is plenty of room on the hype bandwagon though so you're welcome to get on board.
Minny is close with OKC and I love their squad TBH. Hard to see them falling off, but Sac had a 2-1 record against them last season so I would expect close battles again, same with OKC at 2-2. They match up relatively well with those teams, unlike those pesky Pelicans.
Was it a sugar hit after the TDL for Dallas?
Denver isn't close to what they were last year and we will see just how much KCP meant to them. They do have the best player in the game though.
Phoenix will obviously be good and will be in that group, as will Memphis and if NOP get a 5 they will be too.
I see that anything can happen between Sac, Mem, NOP, Dal, Den, Minn, Pho and should be 2-8 drawings.
I also won't be surprised if Hou is fighting for a place along with the Spurs.
Don't worry about DDR in the POs. He needs to help get the team there mainly. He will help with the sleepy games the Kings lose like Detroit, Charlotte, Portland.
Also he won’t be reloaded on as the best player in the playoffs when we have fox and Sabonis
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 985
- And1: 172
- Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Godaddycurse wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Lmao we won 46+ games two years in a row last year we were on pace to be the sixth seed with fox playing hurt for two months than we lost our starting SG and backup SG for the season. How do you expect a team to keep pace in the Wild West down the starter and backup at the same position. Now we added a 20/5/5 all star for our worst starter and you’re saying play in first round absolutely ridiculous
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
I think he is referring to DeMar Derozan. But I have only skimmed the posts.
"I don't want to hear what he can't do. Tell me what the player can do to help us." Bill Walsh
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,053
- And1: 8,388
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Turning kings into contenders
BEEF STEW!!!!!
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,438
- And1: 17,235
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Remove the 1st, reduce the protection on existinh pick to top 4.
It's a decent gamble for the Kings, Hawks have 2 young 6'8-6'9 forwards and don't need Hunter, and they are short on shooting.
It's a decent gamble for the Kings, Hawks have 2 young 6'8-6'9 forwards and don't need Hunter, and they are short on shooting.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Turning kings into contenders
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,486
- And1: 43,629
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Kings road to being contenders starts with turning Sabonis in to a 2-way big. That's the harsh truth.
Exception would be trading for JI and he remains healthy for 4-5 seasons
Exception would be trading for JI and he remains healthy for 4-5 seasons
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Turning kings into contenders
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 3,100
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Turning kings into contenders
Jkam31 wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
When did Hunter become an all star or ever averaged 20/5/5?
Are you confusing him with Ingram?
Barnes for DDR.
This trade doesn't advance the Kings further IMO. If the Kings want to truly become a contender it's going to be a Keegan/draft picks for superstar type deal.
Keegan is going into his third year the third year leap is coming last year he went from an average defender to an elite defender so he has shown he can get better as he goes. Keegan ain’t getting traded for anything short of a top 5 player
Agreed. That's why I mentioned superstar. It wouldn't be for a middle of the road star. He is there himself if he gets more reps.
Return to Trades and Transactions