[Wojnarowski]: Murray Extends In Denver (4/$208)
Posted: Sat Sep 7, 2024 8:02 pm
?s=46&t=bsTHbtMSqHXbNGi0vWP8hw
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2404063
HornetJail wrote:you're building for the next couple years while you have a 3x MVP in his prime. Deal with the consequences of that contract later... in any case, there are far worse contracts out there to completely undeserving players. Murray is not one of them
SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Laimbeer wrote:SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
HadAnEffectHere wrote:HornetJail wrote:you're building for the next couple years while you have a 3x MVP in his prime. Deal with the consequences of that contract later... in any case, there are far worse contracts out there to completely undeserving players. Murray is not one of them
I mean, but the Nuggets aren't?
They gave up on contention by refusing to pay KCP.
So wildly overpaying Murray right after giving up is pretty odd.
eminence wrote:Another in a long line of moves I don't much like from Denver.
Guess I liked drafting Holmes.
zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:SNPA wrote:Boom or bust contract.
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
toooskies wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
While his career playoff numbers are good, this past year's numbers would at least give you pause if you're paying for past performance.
Laimbeer wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
So we're going to pick one stat, playoffs only, and still skew it toward him because it doesn't cover his strengths?
I'd have him below
SGA
Luka
Brunson
Hali
Steph
Kyrie
Trae
Dame
Mitchell (is he a point?)
Those guys are all offensive engines. Murry isn't, at least not to that extent. And the elephant in the room is his health. I'd like to see his contract a little more (not totally) like Zion's.
Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:
Never been an all-star. Is he even a top ten point guard? Under no scenario is this a "boom". If he stays healthy, it's still too generous. And obviously there's a good chance he won't be.
I love it for Murray. I think the Nuggets overpaid.
He's a top 5 PG in the league in terms of playoff performance
Has the same career playoff PER as Lillard, Kyrie, Mitchell. Only guys really ahead are Luka, Curry, Brunson. But PER is offense leaning and a Murray is more valuable on defense than these other names.
He is far worse in RS though and didn't get paid this contract for RS.
The minute requirement to qualify for career PER rankings may be excluding some guys. It requires 1500 minutes to qualify, so guys like Haliburton don’t qualify yet (only 15 gp and 1500 minutes) but outrank him too (22.0 PER).
Even then, it’s purely a past ranking with no guarantee of the future. I mean, I get why they gave him the contract, but sheesh, I don’t know if I like it. They could extend him at any point this season, so I don’t know if I get why they locked this in now?