Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
Simple question, if the Lakers cash in all their assets are they a contender, and what would it look like for them to do so?
I think LAL is potentially one of the more interesting stories this year - they have LeBron and AD, certainly a core of a high-level playoff team if James hasn't fallen off a cliff. But outside of that they have a very below-average supporting cast. They have some assets and moveable salaries, so what could they look like if they really made a push?
I think LAL is potentially one of the more interesting stories this year - they have LeBron and AD, certainly a core of a high-level playoff team if James hasn't fallen off a cliff. But outside of that they have a very below-average supporting cast. They have some assets and moveable salaries, so what could they look like if they really made a push?

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,562
- And1: 13,918
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
What valuable trade assets do they have to offer?
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
JRoy wrote:What valuable trade assets do they have to offer?
Of stuff maybe on the table:
Valuable to all teams:
2028 pick swap
2029 LAL 1st
2030 pick swap
2031 LAL 1st
Valuable to most teams:
Dalton Knecht
Valuable to some teams:
Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russell
Marginal value:
Jalen Hood-Schifino
Jarred Vanderbilt
Valuable to Utah:
removing 1-4 protections on 2027 LAL 1st
Filler:
Gabe Vincent
Christian Wood
Jaxson Hayes (though they probably don't mind keeping)
Maxwell Lewis
Tradeable later and maybe valuable:
Max Christie
Probably not available but has value: Austin Reeves

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,562
- And1: 13,918
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:What valuable trade assets do they have to offer?
Of stuff maybe on the table:
Valuable to all teams:
2028 pick swap
2029 LAL 1st
2030 pick swap
2031 LAL 1st
Valuable to most teams:
Dalton Knecht
Valuable to some teams:
Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russell
Marginal value:
Jalen Hood-Schifino
Jarred Vanderbilt
Valuable to Utah:
removing 1-4 protections on 2027 LAL 1st
Filler:
Gabe Vincent
Christian Wood
Jaxson Hayes (though they probably don't mind keeping)
Maxwell Lewis
Tradeable later and maybe valuable:
Max Christie
Probably not available but has value: Austin Reeves
Mediocre assets. LAL could try to make a move for distressed assets that might succeed with a change of scenery.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:What valuable trade assets do they have to offer?
Of stuff maybe on the table:
Valuable to all teams:
2028 pick swap
2029 LAL 1st
2030 pick swap
2031 LAL 1st
Valuable to most teams:
Dalton Knecht
Valuable to some teams:
Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russell
Marginal value:
Jalen Hood-Schifino
Jarred Vanderbilt
Valuable to Utah:
removing 1-4 protections on 2027 LAL 1st
Filler:
Gabe Vincent
Christian Wood
Jaxson Hayes (though they probably don't mind keeping)
Maxwell Lewis
Tradeable later and maybe valuable:
Max Christie
Probably not available but has value: Austin Reeves
Mediocre assets. LAL could try to make a move for distressed assets that might succeed with a change of scenery.
I don't think the picks are mediocre. But, I do think they are looking at guys like Brandon Ingram, Zach LaVine, Jerami Grant, etc. as their best "high-end" targets.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,562
- And1: 13,918
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:Of stuff maybe on the table:
Valuable to all teams:
2028 pick swap
2029 LAL 1st
2030 pick swap
2031 LAL 1st
Valuable to most teams:
Dalton Knecht
Valuable to some teams:
Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russell
Marginal value:
Jalen Hood-Schifino
Jarred Vanderbilt
Valuable to Utah:
removing 1-4 protections on 2027 LAL 1st
Filler:
Gabe Vincent
Christian Wood
Jaxson Hayes (though they probably don't mind keeping)
Maxwell Lewis
Tradeable later and maybe valuable:
Max Christie
Probably not available but has value: Austin Reeves
Mediocre assets. LAL could try to make a move for distressed assets that might succeed with a change of scenery.
I don't think the picks are mediocre. But, I do think they are looking at guys like Brandon Ingram, Zach LaVine, Jerami Grant, etc. as their best "high-end" targets.
I am sure LAL would like those guys. Swaps are close to worthless, and the FRP have questionable value as a top FA destination.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:
Mediocre assets. LAL could try to make a move for distressed assets that might succeed with a change of scenery.
I don't think the picks are mediocre. But, I do think they are looking at guys like Brandon Ingram, Zach LaVine, Jerami Grant, etc. as their best "high-end" targets.
I am sure LAL would like those guys. Swaps are close to worthless, and the FRP have questionable value as a top FA destination.
In the last 10 years the Lakers have missed the playoffs 6 times.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,562
- And1: 13,918
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:I don't think the picks are mediocre. But, I do think they are looking at guys like Brandon Ingram, Zach LaVine, Jerami Grant, etc. as their best "high-end" targets.
I am sure LAL would like those guys. Swaps are close to worthless, and the FRP have questionable value as a top FA destination.
In the last 10 years the Lakers have missed the playoffs 6 times.
Sure.
They also had an all time top 10 player sign in FA.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:
I am sure LAL would like those guys. Swaps are close to worthless, and the FRP have questionable value as a top FA destination.
In the last 10 years the Lakers have missed the playoffs 6 times.
Sure.
They also had an all time top 10 player sign in FA.
and immediately missed the playoffs, then won a championship in the bubble (still a championship, obviously),then almost missed the playoffs, then missed the playoffs again, then almost missed in every season since.
It is an unstable, poorly run organization that doesn't put together coherent teams. The wildcard is always free agency, but while they won a championship outside of that one good run the entire thing has been a failure that has missed the playoffs twice. They might miss them again this year, and they certainly don't have a bright post-LeBron future without some extremely good luck (that admittedly is more possible because they are Los Angeles).

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,425
- And1: 7,164
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:babyjax13 wrote:In the last 10 years the Lakers have missed the playoffs 6 times.
Sure.
They also had an all time top 10 player sign in FA.
and immediately missed the playoffs, then won a championship in the bubble (still a championship, obviously),then almost missed the playoffs, then missed the playoffs again, then almost missed in every season since.
It is an unstable, poorly run organization that doesn't put together coherent teams. The wildcard is always free agency, but while they won a championship outside of that one good run the entire thing has been a failure that has missed the playoffs twice. They might miss them again this year, and they certainly don't have a bright post-LeBron future without some extremely good luck (that admittedly is more possible because they are Los Angeles).
Perhaps the most relevant is the post-Kobe run than involved a bunch of lotto picks and 3 straight #2 picks. Any elite players looking to change teams are going to want a stockpile of youth/picks/assets to add other guys. It will take the Lakers a while to get that.
Of course this is also why the Lakers should be careful about not shipping out those future 1sts - especially for guy who really aren't difference-makers like Grant or LaVine.
Granted LaVine should be gettable for just matching salary, but that probably doesn't help the Lakers as the resulting team ends up with major depth issues.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
giberish wrote:babyjax13 wrote:JRoy wrote:
Sure.
They also had an all time top 10 player sign in FA.
and immediately missed the playoffs, then won a championship in the bubble (still a championship, obviously),then almost missed the playoffs, then missed the playoffs again, then almost missed in every season since.
It is an unstable, poorly run organization that doesn't put together coherent teams. The wildcard is always free agency, but while they won a championship outside of that one good run the entire thing has been a failure that has missed the playoffs twice. They might miss them again this year, and they certainly don't have a bright post-LeBron future without some extremely good luck (that admittedly is more possible because they are Los Angeles).
Perhaps the most relevant is the post-Kobe run than involved a bunch of lotto picks and 3 straight #2 picks. Any elite players looking to change teams are going to want a stockpile of youth/picks/assets to add other guys. It will take the Lakers a while to get that.
Of course this is also why the Lakers should be careful about not shipping out those future 1sts - especially for guy who really aren't difference-makers like Grant or LaVine.
Granted LaVine should be gettable for just matching salary, but that probably doesn't help the Lakers as the resulting team ends up with major depth issues.
Which is why the thought experiment is interesting, I'm not sure I see a path with their assets to be a contender, so it might make sense to do as they are and just be a play-in team till LeBron retires.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,482
- And1: 43,626
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
Yes they can be a championship team or top 3 favourite this season with moves and health.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
zimpy27 wrote:Yes they can be a championship team or top 3 favourite this season with moves and health.
Well what moves? That is what OP wants to explore.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,961
- And1: 13,891
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
I think they may try to do what the mavs did last trade deadline if the team is healthy and in playoff hunt. ie add a C and defender
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,482
- And1: 43,626
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
psman2 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Yes they can be a championship team or top 3 favourite this season with moves and health.
Well what moves? That is what OP wants to explore.
I think one of Ingram or Butler as a target to join Reaves, Christie, LeBron, Davis.
You then need to work out your bench depending on what you give up for Ingram or Butler but that's the first move.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,905
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
Not really sure why Reaves is off the table here. As a part time starter, he averaged 12 ppg on meh efficiency and his defense is only passable in the regular season. His career stats are right there too. He's already 26.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,083
- And1: 3,417
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
zimpy27 wrote:Yes they can be a championship team or top 3 favourite this season with moves and health.
I applaud your optimism, but I just don't see it. I'm picking them as a play-in at best team for yet another season. LBJ & AD were both the healthiest they've been in years last season and it wasn't remotely enough. They have some assets, but I'm not sure that I'd classify any of them as stellar. I just don't see a potential move that makes them into a contender.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,482
- And1: 43,626
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
jbk1234 wrote:Not really sure why Reaves is off the table here. As a part time starter, he averaged 12 ppg on meh efficiency and his defense is only passable in the regular season. His career stats are right there too. He's already 26.
Because he's more valuable to a team trying to contend than not given that he is 26, point is to improve the Lakers. He's a locked in starter.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,083
- And1: 3,417
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
zimpy27 wrote:psman2 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Yes they can be a championship team or top 3 favourite this season with moves and health.
Well what moves? That is what OP wants to explore.
I think one of Ingram or Butler as a target to join Reaves, Christie, LeBron, Davis.
You then need to work out your bench depending on what you give up for Ingram or Butler but that's the first move.
I'd be interested to see what a potential Ingram or Butler looks like to you. I played around with it a bit and don't see a deal to satisfy NOP or MIA.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Is an "all-in" Lakers team a contender? Trade ideas?
jbk1234 wrote:Not really sure why Reaves is off the table here. As a part time starter, he averaged 12 ppg on meh efficiency and his defense is only passable in the regular season. His career stats are right there too. He's already 26.
I think efficiency is his strength --.613 TS% last year and .633 for his career is not something I would describe as meh efficiency for a guard.
I think if a real star is on the table then he would be for sure available if desired and needed to make the deal work. Likely won't be needed to land the Ingram type of star.
Return to Trades and Transactions