LAL - Portland - Minnesota

[Godaddycurse]

Minnesota trade: NAW
Minnesota receive: Reath, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd

Portland trade: Reath
Portland receive: JHS, laker filler

LAL trade: JHS, filer, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd
LAL receive: NAW

Why for LAL: get a POA wing defender
Why for Portland: take a flier on a prospect
Why for Minnesota: add C depth

[JRoy]

Minnesota trade: NAW
Minnesota receive: Reath, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd

Portland trade: Reath
Portland receive: JHS, laker filler

LAL trade: JHS, filer, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd
LAL receive: NAW

Why for LAL: get a POA wing defender
Why for Portland: take a flier on a prospect
Why for Minnesota: add C depth

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.



*****typo, 2 SRP******

[tester551]

Minnesota trade: NAW
Minnesota receive: Reath, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd

Portland trade: Reath
Portland receive: JHS, laker filler

LAL trade: JHS, filer, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd
LAL receive: NAW

Why for LAL: get a POA wing defender
Why for Portland: take a flier on a prospect
Why for Minnesota: add C depth

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

[Waynearchetype]

Did you mean 2 srp? Reath isnt worth an FRP.

[JRoy]

Did you mean 2 srp? Reath isnt worth an FRP.

Heavens!

I absolutely did. He isn’t worth a single FRP.

[zimpy27]

Minnesota trade: NAW
Minnesota receive: Reath, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd

Portland trade: Reath
Portland receive: JHS, laker filler

LAL trade: JHS, filer, better of LAL/LAC 2025 2nd
LAL receive: NAW

Why for LAL: get a POA wing defender
Why for Portland: take a flier on a prospect
Why for Minnesota: add C depth

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

[nzahir]

Why would Minny want C depth?

They have Gobert, Reid, and Randle

Garza is there for depth

They need a 2/3 or a 3/4

Would love to move JHS and 1-2 2nds for NAW

[Godaddycurse]

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

Minny rather get reath than JHS imo. Reid and Randle are more 4s

[Godaddycurse]

Why would Minny want C depth?

They have Gobert, Reid, and Randle

Garza is there for depth

They need a 2/3 or a 3/4

Would love to move JHS and 1-2 2nds for NAW

Their fan wanted to trade for aldama.. i thought reath + 2nd was more attainable/similar in idea

[zimpy27]

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

Minny rather get reath than JHS imo. Reid and Randle are more 4s

I think they have Gobert and Garza with Randle and Naz able to fill the role of Reath.

JHS is a strong long term fit with Dillingham if he develops.

I personally wouldn't trade JHS but I could see the fit

[JRoy]

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

I think OP wanted Reath to MN.

[tester551]

Less than zero interest from POR.

Salary and 2 FRP for Reath.

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

This works for Portland.

Id rather get Wood over Hayes, but either player would work

[zimpy27]

Agreed.
JHS doesn't help Portland at all and has no intrigue.

Lakers would gladly give the SRPs I think.
That's the way to do it.


Minnesota get JHS
Lakers get NAW, Reath
Blazers get Hayes, 2xSRPs

I think OP wanted Reath to MN.

Yeah I guess I see Minny depth at C as Gobert, Randle, Naz, Garza.

[wolves_89]

Why would Minny want C depth?

They have Gobert, Reid, and Randle

Garza is there for depth

They need a 2/3 or a 3/4

Would love to move JHS and 1-2 2nds for NAW

The Wolves are stacked at the SG/SF and SF/PF, so I can't see them having any interest in Hood-Schifino. As far as C, both Reid and Randle are primarily PF and are too undersized to be the primary C if Gobert is out for any stretch of time. Minnesota could definitely use a backup C with size, but I wouldn't trade NAW for Reath straight up (and I definitely wouldn't trade him JHS).

[nzahir]

Why would Minny want C depth?

They have Gobert, Reid, and Randle

Garza is there for depth

They need a 2/3 or a 3/4

Would love to move JHS and 1-2 2nds for NAW

The Wolves are stacked at the SG/SF and SF/PF, so I can't see them having any interest in Hood-Schifino. As far as C, both Reid and Randle are primarily PF and are too undersized to be the primary C if Gobert is out for any stretch of time. Minnesota could definitely use a backup C with size, but I wouldn't trade NAW for Reath straight up (and I definitely wouldn't trade him JHS).

Reid can play both though no?

Garza isn't good enough as the backup C?

Also JHS is a 1/2, not a 2/3 or 3/4

And I actually think you guys need a bigger sf/pf to replace kyle anderson

Who are the wings if ANT is a 2?

Mcdaniels, Joe Ingles, and Bates Diop?

Can use someone there

[wolves_89]

Why would Minny want C depth?

They have Gobert, Reid, and Randle

Garza is there for depth

They need a 2/3 or a 3/4

Would love to move JHS and 1-2 2nds for NAW

The Wolves are stacked at the SG/SF and SF/PF, so I can't see them having any interest in Hood-Schifino. As far as C, both Reid and Randle are primarily PF and are too undersized to be the primary C if Gobert is out for any stretch of time. Minnesota could definitely use a backup C with size, but I wouldn't trade NAW for Reath straight up (and I definitely wouldn't trade him JHS).

Reid can play both though no?

Garza isn't good enough as the backup C?

Also JHS is a 1/2, not a 2/3 or 3/4

And I actually think you guys need a bigger sf/pf to replace kyle anderson

Who are the wings if ANT is a 2?

Mcdaniels, Joe Ingles, and Bates Diop?

Can use someone there

AT PG the Wolves depth chart is Conley/DiVincenzo/Dillingham/Nix
At SG the Wolves depth chart is Edwards/Divincenzo/NAW/Shannon/Clark
AT SF the Wolves depth chart is McDaniels/Minott/Ingles/NAW/Shannon

I honestly don't think JHS would be a top 4 option at any of those positions for Minnesota.

In terms of size, at SF McDaniels/Minott/Ingles are all above average and at PF Randle/Reid/Miller would all be average or better. I have no idea why you think the Wolves need to get bigger at SF/PF.

As far as Naz Reid, he can play some small ball center, but he has massively slimmed down and is much more a PF than a C. There's even been talk from the coaches that Reid could play some SF this season.

[nzahir]

The Wolves are stacked at the SG/SF and SF/PF, so I can't see them having any interest in Hood-Schifino. As far as C, both Reid and Randle are primarily PF and are too undersized to be the primary C if Gobert is out for any stretch of time. Minnesota could definitely use a backup C with size, but I wouldn't trade NAW for Reath straight up (and I definitely wouldn't trade him JHS).

Reid can play both though no?

Garza isn't good enough as the backup C?

Also JHS is a 1/2, not a 2/3 or 3/4

And I actually think you guys need a bigger sf/pf to replace kyle anderson

Who are the wings if ANT is a 2?

Mcdaniels, Joe Ingles, and Bates Diop?

Can use someone there

AT PG the Wolves depth chart is Conley/DiVincenzo/Dillingham/Nix
At SG the Wolves depth chart is Edwards/Divincenzo/NAW/Shannon/Clark
AT SF the Wolves depth chart is McDaniels/Minott/Ingles/NAW/Shannon

I honestly don't think JHS would be a top 4 option at any of those positions for Minnesota.

In terms of size, at SF McDaniels/Minott/Ingles are all above average and at PF Randle/Reid/Miller would all be average or better. I have no idea why you think the Wolves need to get bigger at SF/PF.

As far as Naz Reid, he can play some small ball center, but he has massively slimmed down and is much more a PF than a C. There's even been talk from the coaches that Reid could play some SF this season.

NAW is 6'5 under 200 pds, he is a 1/2

Who the hell is Minot? The guy who played 3 min a game?

Same for Miller

Shannon is a rookie

Ingles is older

I see a potential need at the 3/4

JHS wouldnt play here, more of a potential play for a guy in yr 2 if you think you cant pay NAW

But I wouldn't personally move him unless you can get a versatile forward

Didnt realize Reid had slimmed down. I think you kind of want him to have some size out there and not be a 3. He actually had some nice plays vs Jokic at times, but while Gobert was in the back line

[wolves_89]

Reid can play both though no?

Garza isn't good enough as the backup C?

Also JHS is a 1/2, not a 2/3 or 3/4

And I actually think you guys need a bigger sf/pf to replace kyle anderson

Who are the wings if ANT is a 2?

Mcdaniels, Joe Ingles, and Bates Diop?

Can use someone there

AT PG the Wolves depth chart is Conley/DiVincenzo/Dillingham/Nix
At SG the Wolves depth chart is Edwards/Divincenzo/NAW/Shannon/Clark
AT SF the Wolves depth chart is McDaniels/Minott/Ingles/NAW/Shannon

I honestly don't think JHS would be a top 4 option at any of those positions for Minnesota.

In terms of size, at SF McDaniels/Minott/Ingles are all above average and at PF Randle/Reid/Miller would all be average or better. I have no idea why you think the Wolves need to get bigger at SF/PF.

As far as Naz Reid, he can play some small ball center, but he has massively slimmed down and is much more a PF than a C. There's even been talk from the coaches that Reid could play some SF this season.

NAW is 6'5 under 200 pds, he is a 1/2

Who the hell is Minot? The guy who played 3 min a game?

Same for Miller

Shannon is a rookie

Ingles is older

I see a potential need at the 3/4

JHS wouldnt play here, more of a potential play for a guy in yr 2 if you think you cant pay NAW

But I wouldn't personally move him unless you can get a versatile forward

Didnt realize Reid had slimmed down. I think you kind of want him to have some size out there and not be a 3. He actually had some nice plays vs Jokic at times, but while Gobert was in the back line

NAW played SF a fair amount last season and I fully expect he will again. He was basically the first option when McDaniels got in foul trouble (which was pretty often).

It's clear you haven't followed the Wolves much this preseason because Minott has been a significant story since the start of camp. He's a freak athlete who was really raw when drafted but looks to have taken a massive step over the Summer and has pretty much forced his way into the rotation mix at SF/PF. The fact that he is not guaranteed rotation minutes when he very clearly should be playing pretty much sums up the Wolves depth at SF/PF (that there is no need to add at those positions).

[DonaldSanders]

I think Minnesota can get a better trade for NAW than this.

[wolves_89]

I think Minnesota can get a better trade for NAW than this.

I think there is a decent chance NAW is available at the trade deadline, especially if Minott and/or Shannon establish themselves. At that point, NAW's skillset could be in high demand resulting in offers much more attractive than Reath or JHS.