GSW/Pdx

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,486
And1: 1,889
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

GSW/Pdx 

Post#1 » by lakerhater » Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:42 am

Kuminga for Scoot

GSW gets a young combo guard.

Pdx gets young 3/4 depth.

Melton is done, GSW needs playmaking help.

Kerr can't figure out how to make Kuminga fit his plans.

Basically one misfit for another.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,560
And1: 13,916
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#2 » by JRoy » Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:53 am

Pass for POR.

Do not want my team paying Kumingas next contract.

Scoot stinks but at least (some might at most) he is cheap.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,486
And1: 1,889
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#3 » by lakerhater » Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:57 am

Well, you don't have to pay JK and if Scoot stinks you're just sending him down the road earlier than later
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,560
And1: 13,916
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#4 » by JRoy » Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:00 am

lakerhater wrote:Well, you don't have to pay JK and if Scoot stinks you're just sending him down the road earlier than later


Or we could continue to vainly hope he justifies his draft position.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,486
And1: 1,889
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#5 » by lakerhater » Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:03 am

JRoy wrote:
lakerhater wrote:Well, you don't have to pay JK and if Scoot stinks you're just sending him down the road earlier than later


Or we could continue to vainly hope he justifies his draft position.


Ditto quote for JK from GSW
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,560
And1: 13,916
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#6 » by JRoy » Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:06 am

Seems we agree about several things.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,457
And1: 2,207
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#7 » by Norm2953 » Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:37 am

Right now, Scoot is the only true PG on the team.

I agree with JRoy in that I wouldn't want Portland stuck with paying for his next contract
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,024
And1: 613
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#8 » by NW » Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:11 pm

Scoot isn't the answer for what GS needs- ballhandler/passer/defender that can score some as well and play alongside Steph. If you have a Steph/Scoot backcourt, there's a problem
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 1,199
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#9 » by Walton1one » Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:25 pm

This is the kind of deal where Scoot goes to GSW and suddenly becomes a much better player under a good coach\offensive structure than the complete lack of both in POR currently

Kuminga wants a max, correct? So POR is locked into giving him one, which he is not worth IMO or risk losing him to another team (BRK?) that would be willing to take such a risk

I’d pass, let’s see what Scoot is like under a competent coach once Billups is shown the door
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,380
And1: 98,230
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#10 » by Texas Chuck » Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:32 pm

Walton1one wrote:
Kuminga wants a max, correct? So POR is locked into giving him one,


Why? Who is making him a max offer? Only the Nets project right now to max space and they are very very unlikely to extend him a max offer. GSW or Portland or whomever holds his restricted rights this off-season are going to be in a good position to retain him for a number considerably less than that. And if he wants to just gamble like crazy on a QO, let him. Team would still have Bird Rights and an additional year to evaluate him.

But I strongly disagree trading for him means trading for him on a new max deal. Nobody should do that.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,789
And1: 7,889
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#11 » by xdrta+ » Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:51 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Walton1one wrote:
Kuminga wants a max, correct? So POR is locked into giving him one,


Why? Who is making him a max offer? Only the Nets project right now to max space and they are very very unlikely to extend him a max offer. GSW or Portland or whomever holds his restricted rights this off-season are going to be in a good position to retain him for a number considerably less than that. And if he wants to just gamble like crazy on a QO, let him. Team would still have Bird Rights and an additional year to evaluate him.

But I strongly disagree trading for him means trading for him on a new max deal. Nobody should do that.


Exactly right, nobody is giving Kuminga a max or close to it. With Melton gone GS does need a ballhandling guard, though, but pretty sure Scoot's not the answer.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,788
And1: 10,446
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#12 » by Myth » Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:02 pm

xdrta+ wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Walton1one wrote:
Kuminga wants a max, correct? So POR is locked into giving him one,


Why? Who is making him a max offer? Only the Nets project right now to max space and they are very very unlikely to extend him a max offer. GSW or Portland or whomever holds his restricted rights this off-season are going to be in a good position to retain him for a number considerably less than that. And if he wants to just gamble like crazy on a QO, let him. Team would still have Bird Rights and an additional year to evaluate him.

But I strongly disagree trading for him means trading for him on a new max deal. Nobody should do that.


Exactly right, nobody is giving Kuminga a max or close to it. With Melton gone GS does need a ballhandling guard, though, but pretty sure Scoot's not the answer.

Even without a max, Portland still may be less likely to offer the most given we have 2 young forwards in Deni and Camara that should factor into the future (I’m assuming Deni bounces back under a coach who knows how to use him). I’m not saying they are so good we couldn’t use a Kuminga, but Portland may be less desperate than another team to overpay for a forward. If it weren’t for the contract situations though, I’d definitely swap Scoot for Kuminga.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,584
And1: 6,227
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#13 » by gswhoops » Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:07 pm

Scoot would be buried on the bench in GS. Pass.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,578
And1: 2,198
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: GSW/Pdx 

Post#14 » by Pattycakes » Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:13 pm

lakerhater wrote:Well, you don't have to pay JK and if Scoot stinks you're just sending him down the road earlier than later


Piss off we’re not dumping scoot :lol: no more internet for you today
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.

Return to Trades and Transactions