The other Chicago/Laker deal

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,380
And1: 98,230
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#1 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:31 pm

Vuc

for

Russell/JHS

Bulls shed the last year of Vuc.
Lakers get a center who pairs well with AD.

2nds to your team as needed.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Ell Curry
Head Coach
Posts: 7,460
And1: 2,077
Joined: Oct 27, 2001
Location: Newfoundland

Re: The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#2 » by Ell Curry » Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:47 pm

I'm assuming Chicago's ownership refusal to tank means they won't deal Vuc for nothing, but I could also see them doing this, paying some 2nds to get off Carter's last year of his deal, letting Terry go, drafting Maluach at center and spending their newfound cap space on Brandon Ingram to be their new DeRozan this summer:

JalenSmith-Maluach
Ingram-Williams
Lavine-Buzelis
Giddey-Lavine
White-Dosunmu

If Giddey is parked/cap held there should be just enough space to squeeze Ingram in at like 30M to start and be under the cap before paying Giddey and still staying well under the tax.

That team isn't going anywhere, but it has too much offensive skill to be genuinely bad.
Where's the D?
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,961
And1: 13,891
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#3 » by Godaddycurse » Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:07 pm

I like this for lakers, bulls why not at the TDL if nothing else better comes along
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,975
And1: 2,367
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#4 » by ChettheJet » Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:30 pm

People don't look smart because they can make check marks on the trade machine. If you count Lavine as a guard the Bulls have 8 on their roster and you want to send them 2 more plus you AGAIN leave Jalen Smith as the only center on the roster. Basically the only player over 6-8, I don't think you pay any attention to the results of trades you propose except for the money. At the very least Jaxson Hayes going to Chicago is a must.
scoobs07
Veteran
Posts: 2,504
And1: 98
Joined: Apr 19, 2001

Re: The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#5 » by scoobs07 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:47 pm

Ell Curry wrote:I'm assuming Chicago's ownership refusal to tank means they won't deal Vuc for nothing, but I could also see them doing this, paying some 2nds to get off Carter's last year of his deal, letting Terry go, drafting Maluach at center and spending their newfound cap space on Brandon Ingram to be their new DeRozan this summer:

JalenSmith-Maluach
Ingram-Williams
Lavine-Buzelis
Giddey-Lavine
White-Dosunmu

If Giddey is parked/cap held there should be just enough space to squeeze Ingram in at like 30M to start and be under the cap before paying Giddey and still staying well under the tax.

That team isn't going anywhere, but it has too much offensive skill to be genuinely bad.
I want to chime in here but confused by this comment. Chicago doesn't want to tank? Can you please clarify?
Ell Curry
Head Coach
Posts: 7,460
And1: 2,077
Joined: Oct 27, 2001
Location: Newfoundland

Re: The other Chicago/Laker deal 

Post#6 » by Ell Curry » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:41 pm

scoobs07 wrote: I want to chime in here but confused by this comment. Chicago doesn't want to tank? Can you please clarify?


I'm not a Bulls fan, but my understanding of the situation there is that Reinsdorf doesn't want to tank and lose ticket sales or sell the team, but the team has no real path to being genuinely good or truly terrible, so other than hitting on their picks in the lower half of the lottery, they are sort of locked into that dreaded fighting for the play-in in the East no man's land.

Trading Caruso for Giddey rather than getting back a pick or 2 like many expected was a real sign of not wanting to tank but instead try to keep a competitive 30+ win team.

It's not completely hopeless or anything there, they have some young talent and maybe they can finish with the 8th or 9th pick this year, retain it and get a quality big or a wing.

So the logical move with their pick being only top 10 protected this year was to trade Caruso for a pick instead of a middling player like Giddey, move Vucevic (or Lavine) to ensure the tank, keep their pick for sure and get a frontcourt star or quality wing to go with White and Lavine hope that guys like Dosunmu, Buzelis, Jalen Smith, Patrick Williams and the pick they'd have gotten for Caruso would develop into good complimentary pieces, maybe add a not so old free agent to go with them.
Where's the D?

Return to Trades and Transactions