Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,481
And1: 43,625
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#1 » by zimpy27 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 10:47 pm

Lakers get Ball, Smith, THT
Lakers give DLo, Gabe, Jaxson, LAL27FRP(unprotect 1-4), LAL25SRP


Bulls get DLo, Gabe, Kessler
Bulls give Ball, Smith, THT, POR25FRP(lottery protect to 2028)

Jazz get Jaxson, LAL27FRP(unprotect 1-4), POR25FRP(lottery protect to 2028), LAL25SRP
Jazz give Kessler



Lakers get a starting defensive guard and backup C, THT returns to Lakers as a useful backup for a potential Lonzo injury.

Bulls get Kessler, a long-term starting C for the franchise.

Jazz get draft compensation for Kessler
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,053
And1: 17,564
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#2 » by babyjax13 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 10:57 pm

THT is probably the worst NBA player the Jazz have had in the last 15 years. I don't see this for the Lakers even without the pick, tbh. DLo is so much better than what they get back. For Utah I don't like the value at all.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,481
And1: 43,625
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#3 » by zimpy27 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:04 pm

babyjax13 wrote:THT is probably the worst NBA player the Jazz have had in the last 15 years. I don't see this for the Lakers even without the pick, tbh. DLo is so much better than what they get back. For Utah I don't like the value at all.



Yeah THT is just playmaking backup for Lakers. He's not a main piece.
Lonzo, Reaves, Knecht, LeBron, Davis -- Christie, Reddish, Vando, Rui, Smith -- JHS, Bronny, THT, Lewis, Wood

DLo is having a down year and expiring, I don't think he brings much value back. Ball and DLo are roughly similar value, it's Vincent for Smith that requires Lakers to give up compensation.

I wasn't sure if Bulls were giving up enough value for Kessler though, perhaps they need to up the offer in this deal, maybe their future FRP instead of the Portland one.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,053
And1: 17,564
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#4 » by babyjax13 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:12 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:THT is probably the worst NBA player the Jazz have had in the last 15 years. I don't see this for the Lakers even without the pick, tbh. DLo is so much better than what they get back. For Utah I don't like the value at all.



Yeah THT is just playmaking backup for Lakers. He's not a main piece.

DLo is having a down year and expiring, I don't think he brings much value back. Ball and DLo are roughly similar value, it's Vincent for Smith that requires Lakers to give up compensation.

I wasn't sure if Bulls were giving up enough value for Kessler though, perhaps they need to up the offer in this deal, maybe their future FRP instead of the Portland one.

DLo is having a down year, but Ball isn't having a year (and to the extent that he is, is much worse than DLo).
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,685
And1: 9,242
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#5 » by Dez » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:44 pm

Yeah no thanks, you had me until we were sending out Smith.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,053
And1: 17,564
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#6 » by babyjax13 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:50 pm

Dez wrote:Yeah no thanks, you had me until we were sending out Smith.

You are getting Kessler, who is much better, and getting DLo who is better than current Ball for the cost of what amounts to two seconds. This is a no brainer for Chicago.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,685
And1: 9,242
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#7 » by Dez » Mon Dec 9, 2024 1:40 am

babyjax13 wrote:
Dez wrote:Yeah no thanks, you had me until we were sending out Smith.

You are getting Kessler, who is much better, and getting DLo who is better than current Ball for the cost of what amounts to two seconds. This is a no brainer for Chicago.


I rather keep Ball than take Russell.
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,811
And1: 10,484
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#8 » by meekrab » Mon Dec 9, 2024 2:22 am

Kessler is definitely intriguing but as the Bulls I'd ask Pelinka why he wants the relative nobody Smith instead of my red hot shooting experienced veteran all star Vucevic who's even on a shorter contract. ;)

babyjax13 wrote:
Dez wrote:Yeah no thanks, you had me until we were sending out Smith.

You are getting Kessler, who is much better, and getting DLo who is better than current Ball for the cost of what amounts to two seconds. This is a no brainer for Chicago.

The Bulls are +8/100 when Lonzo is on the court it's not clear to me swapping him for Dlo who plays a completely different style that duplicates Coby White and Zach LaVine improves the team.
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,011
And1: 7,157
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#9 » by doogie_hauser » Mon Dec 9, 2024 3:08 am

The return the Lakers are getting in this transaction is not enticing enough for them to give up their 2027 FRP unless they someone get Kessler as part of the equation, even if the principle of this deal is for the Lakers to shred bad contracts and players.
User avatar
Cappy_Smurf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,322
And1: 9,809
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
     

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#10 » by Cappy_Smurf » Mon Dec 9, 2024 4:09 am

doogie_hauser wrote:The return the Lakers are getting in this transaction is not enticing enough for them to give up their 2027 FRP unless they someone get Kessler as part of the equation, even if the principle of this deal is for the Lakers to shred bad contracts and players.


They already did give it up. It belongs to Utah, top 4 protected. This just removes the protection.
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,011
And1: 7,157
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#11 » by doogie_hauser » Mon Dec 9, 2024 4:12 am

Cappy_Smurf wrote:
doogie_hauser wrote:The return the Lakers are getting in this transaction is not enticing enough for them to give up their 2027 FRP unless they someone get Kessler as part of the equation, even if the principle of this deal is for the Lakers to shred bad contracts and players.


They already did give it up. It belongs to Utah, top 4 protected. This just removes the protection.


Ah my mistake. That makes more sense for the Lakeshow then (although it probably means they will be a less competitive team for the short term
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,481
And1: 43,625
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#12 » by zimpy27 » Mon Dec 9, 2024 4:25 am

Dez wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
Dez wrote:Yeah no thanks, you had me until we were sending out Smith.

You are getting Kessler, who is much better, and getting DLo who is better than current Ball for the cost of what amounts to two seconds. This is a no brainer for Chicago.


I rather keep Ball than take Russell.


Even so, do you prefer Smith+Ball over DLo+Kessler?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,685
And1: 9,242
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#13 » by Dez » Mon Dec 9, 2024 9:37 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Dez wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:You are getting Kessler, who is much better, and getting DLo who is better than current Ball for the cost of what amounts to two seconds. This is a no brainer for Chicago.


I rather keep Ball than take Russell.


Even so, do you prefer Smith+Ball over DLo+Kessler?


Yes because Russell is that useless.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,975
And1: 2,368
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#14 » by ChettheJet » Mon Dec 9, 2024 5:33 pm

This is the same only worse for the Bulls

Compare Vincent with Javon Carter and aside from Vincent's higher salary what's the difference? So why do the Bulls need both of them?

I'd rather keep Ball than take on DLo.
If Kessler was so good why would he be on the block? Is he really better than Smith?
So the Bulls give up the imaginary pick and THT for nothing.

Worse than most Laker trades for the Bulls
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 380
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#15 » by OutsidetheNBA » Mon Dec 9, 2024 6:33 pm

zimpy27 wrote:Lakers get Ball, Smith, THT
Lakers give DLo, Gabe, Jaxson, LAL27FRP(unprotect 1-4), LAL25SRP


Bulls get DLo, Gabe, Kessler
Bulls give Ball, Smith, THT, POR25FRP(lottery protect to 2028)

Jazz get Jaxson, LAL27FRP(unprotect 1-4), POR25FRP(lottery protect to 2028), LAL25SRP
Jazz give Kessler



Lakers get a starting defensive guard and backup C, THT returns to Lakers as a useful backup for a potential Lonzo injury.

Bulls get Kessler, a long-term starting C for the franchise.

Jazz get draft compensation for Kessler


Lakers already traded their '27 pick to the Jazz. It would need to be the '29FRP.

Seems good for the Bulls and Jazz. Terrible for the Lakers -- Ball is an expiring and has injury concerns, Smith is a back up, and THT is not a playoff rotation guy. Lakers should not trade yet another 1st round pick unless it makes them a contender and this trade gets them nowhere close to that.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,224
And1: 6,242
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#16 » by JMAC3 » Mon Dec 9, 2024 6:43 pm

Seems like the Bulls are the big winners in this deal, so strange to see the Bulls fans giving the most pushback.

Lonzo is probably gone after this year, Portland first seems like a mirage based on how good the West. Jalen Smith is a nice backup, but Kessler is a guy that can actually take over as a starter post Vuc, I have doubts Smith is that type of player.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,481
And1: 43,625
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Jazz :: something different 

Post#17 » by zimpy27 » Mon Dec 9, 2024 7:34 pm

ChettheJet wrote:This is the same only worse for the Bulls

Compare Vincent with Javon Carter and aside from Vincent's higher salary what's the difference? So why do the Bulls need both of them?

I'd rather keep Ball than take on DLo.
If Kessler was so good why would he be on the block? Is he really better than Smith?
So the Bulls give up the imaginary pick and THT for nothing.

Worse than most Laker trades for the Bulls


Bulls get the best player in the trade in Kessler..

If you don't think that then sure the trade falls apart.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie

Return to Trades and Transactions


cron