Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?

[Toine85]

Beal is 3 years younger and contract is one year shorter, but PG’s more versatile. Does it make sense for both the Suns and Sixers?

[Godaddycurse]

no for sixers

[winforlose]

Beal is 3 years younger and contract is one year shorter, but PG’s more versatile. Does it make sense for both the Suns and Sixers?

Of course not. Beal has a no trade clause and a lower floor. Even an unprotected first cannot even make this plausible.

[balsamic_ducks]

I don’t think this will be that implausible after this year. PG is falling off a cliff

[Texas Chuck]

This doesn't meant the criteria for a thread. Probably just belongs in the general thoughts thread, but if OP wants to flesh this out to make it legal and give reasons why each team and Beal agree to the deal, feel free to re=post it.