Page 1 of 1
Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:14 am
by Toine85
Beal is 3 years younger and contract is one year shorter, but PG’s more versatile. Does it make sense for both the Suns and Sixers?
Re: Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:18 am
by Godaddycurse
no for sixers
Re: Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:44 am
by winforlose
Toine85 wrote:Beal is 3 years younger and contract is one year shorter, but PG’s more versatile. Does it make sense for both the Suns and Sixers?
Of course not. Beal has a no trade clause and a lower floor. Even an unprotected first cannot even make this plausible.
Re: Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:58 am
by balsamic_ducks
I don’t think this will be that implausible after this year. PG is falling off a cliff
Re: Beal for PG and Reggie Jackson. who says no?
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:10 am
by Texas Chuck
This doesn't meant the criteria for a thread. Probably just belongs in the general thoughts thread, but if OP wants to flesh this out to make it legal and give reasons why each team and Beal agree to the deal, feel free to re=post it.