CLE/SAC

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,024
And1: 293
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

CLE/SAC 

Post#1 » by bgrep14 » Tue Jan 14, 2025 3:10 am

Cleveland: Garland, Strus, and Niang

Sacramento: Fox, Monk, and Lyles

Cavs get a better sg and and a year shorter on Niang by trading 3 years of garland control

Sacramento gets a comparable point guard with 3 more years of control who’s 3 years younger.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: CLE/SAC 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Jan 14, 2025 3:17 am

Cleveland is never considering a major change of a team on a 70 plus win pace with Garland a major driving force of that record setting offense. Just complete non-starter from their end.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,024
And1: 8,372
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: CLE/SAC 

Post#3 » by SNPA » Tue Jan 14, 2025 5:30 am

Texas Chuck wrote:Cleveland is never considering a major change of a team on a 70 plus win pace with Garland a major driving force of that record setting offense. Just complete non-starter from their end.

This is true.

It’s also not a great deal for Sac.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: CLE/SAC 

Post#4 » by OGSactownballer » Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:43 am

Neither team would even have an interest in this.

Return to Trades and Transactions