Lakers-Bulls-Blazers

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,457
And1: 43,607
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#1 » by zimpy27 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:24 pm

Lakers get Lonzo, Reath
Lakers give Rui, Knecht, Vincent

Bulls get Rui (in to tpe), Knecht, Vincent, $10m TPE
Bulls give Lonzo, Jevon, POR25FRP(1-14)

Blazers get Jevon (in to TPE), POR25FRP(1-14), $2m TPE
Blazers give Reath


Lakers get more playmaking that they need since losing DLo, they also get a backup C. Lakers drop under 1st apron making them ready to take large salary buyout players.
Reaves, Christie, DFS, LeBron, Davis -- Lonzo, Milton, Vando, Wood, Reath -- JHS, Bronny, Reddish, Hayes

Bulls get two wings (Rui and Knecht) that fit their group while moving some of the clutter in their guard rotation.
Giddey, Ayo, LaVine, PatWill, Vuc -- Coby, Knecht, Buz, Rui, Smith -- Vincent, Terry, Duarte, Phillips, Craig

Blazers get their pick back and restore flexibility there, even though it was unlikely to convey more than SRPs.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,281
And1: 1,405
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#2 » by cucad8 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:32 pm

Easy yes for portland
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 1,199
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#3 » by Walton1one » Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:45 pm

This would be a no from POR most likely. Swapping Reath ($2.048mil) for Carter ($6.5mil + $6.5mil PO next year) puts POR ($3.72 below) into the luxury tax, which is probably a non-starter, especially for a minor deal like this.

I like the concept of POR getting their 25' 1st back, but I don't see them going into the luxury tax to do so.
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,281
And1: 1,405
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#4 » by cucad8 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:01 pm

Walton1one wrote:This would be a no from POR most likely. Swapping Reath ($2.048mil) for Carter ($6.5mil + $6.5mil PO next year) puts POR ($3.72 below) into the luxury tax, which is probably a non-starter, especially for a minor deal like this.

I like the concept of POR getting their 25' 1st back, but I don't see them going into the luxury tax to do so.

Didn't look at salaries before I posted, good catch
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 3,567
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#5 » by zzaj » Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:02 pm

Blazers wouldn't have to worry about that until the end of next season, right? I wouldn't think that would be a problem.

In terms of value I like it.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 9,889
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#6 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:07 pm

Ya this cant be turned down by Portland.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#7 » by JRoy » Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:14 pm

Yes for POR
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#8 » by Myth » Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:57 pm

Yes for Portland, and then it seems they have plenty of time to make a cost saving move.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,543
And1: 1,253
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#9 » by tester551 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:00 am

cucad8 wrote:Easy yes for portland

Not so sure...

I think this kicks Portland into the tax. If we can send out Walker in addition - then it would be a yes.

*** EDIT *** Looks like Lakers are dropping salary in this trade, so they should be able to take on Walker to keep Portland out of the tax.
It also appears that Chicago would need to cut someone from the roster to make this legal.
Kazuya10
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,355
And1: 91
Joined: Jul 25, 2002
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Contact:

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#10 » by Kazuya10 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:19 am

As a Bulls fan I would do it.

Nice work

Sent from my SM-S928B using RealGM mobile app
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 3,567
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#11 » by zzaj » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:08 am

tester551 wrote:
cucad8 wrote:Easy yes for portland

Not so sure...

I think this kicks Portland into the tax. If we can send out Walker in addition - then it would be a yes.

*** EDIT *** Looks like Lakers are dropping salary in this trade, so they should be able to take on Walker to keep Portland out of the tax.
It also appears that Chicago would need to cut someone from the roster to make this legal.


The Blazers would have plenty of time to get out of the Tax as needed.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,457
And1: 43,607
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#12 » by zimpy27 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:55 am

Walton1one wrote:This would be a no from POR most likely. Swapping Reath ($2.048mil) for Carter ($6.5mil + $6.5mil PO next year) puts POR ($3.72 below) into the luxury tax, which is probably a non-starter, especially for a minor deal like this.

I like the concept of POR getting their 25' 1st back, but I don't see them going into the luxury tax to do so.



Good catch, yeah you got the dead money i didn't see.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 3,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#13 » by axeman23 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:57 am

This seems poor value for the Lakers from where i stand. And that feeling seems to be reinforced by all the Portland fans happily agreeing to the deal (what is it, "37 GLORIOUS years without dealing with the Lakers", something like that?) :lol: Jokes aside, I'd at LEAST try to sub Knecht out for JHS (still young at 21, and would be buried behind Reaves, Ball and Lebron at Lakers anyway.). Doesn't really affect the deal money-wise.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,457
And1: 43,607
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#14 » by zimpy27 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:04 am

axeman23 wrote:This seems poor value for the Lakers from where i stand. And that feeling seems to be reinforced by all the Portland fans happily agreeing to the deal (what is it, "37 GLORIOUS years without dealing with the Lakers", something like that?) :lol: Jokes aside, I'd at LEAST try to sub Knecht out for JHS (still young at 21, and would be buried behind Reaves, Ball and Lebron at Lakers anyway.). Doesn't really affect the deal money-wise.


You could but then you need the pick compensation to match
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 3,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#15 » by axeman23 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:08 am

zimpy27 wrote:
axeman23 wrote:This seems poor value for the Lakers from where i stand. And that feeling seems to be reinforced by all the Portland fans happily agreeing to the deal (what is it, "37 GLORIOUS years without dealing with the Lakers", something like that?) :lol: Jokes aside, I'd at LEAST try to sub Knecht out for JHS (still young at 21, and would be buried behind Reaves, Ball and Lebron at Lakers anyway.). Doesn't really affect the deal money-wise.


You could but then you need the pick compensation to match


A 2nd or 2? Absolutely! Lebron needs shooters to get the ball to in the playoffs and give him and AD space. Knecht does that. Future 2nds should be of minimal importance compared to competing NOW.

Edit: I guess I also struggle to get my head around Reath being brought in as a "backup centre" at 6'9. Yes, it's worked in the past, small-ball. But I can't imagine it will be pretty, any minutes he has to play vs the bigger centres in the playoffs. JMO...
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,682
And1: 9,238
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#16 » by Dez » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:17 am

Feels like Portland give very little to get back their pick.

I feel like they should throw in a 2nd or two to the Lakers.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#17 » by JRoy » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:20 am

Dez wrote:Feels like Portland give very little to get back their pick.

I feel like they should throw in a 2nd or two to the Lakers.


Absolutely not.

That pick will most likely convey as a SRP.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 3,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#18 » by axeman23 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:30 am

JRoy wrote:
Dez wrote:Feels like Portland give very little to get back their pick.

I feel like they should throw in a 2nd or two to the Lakers.


Absolutely not.

That pick will most likely convey as a SRP.


I agree that's the likely outcome, but it DOES give you back some flexibility for trading picks in the future. And I'm not saying that to get more 2nds for the Lakers. I'd actually try to get a single 2nd for CHI, not Lakers. And after looking at my altered deal (bringing in JHS instead of Knecht), I realised JHS also has a lot of competition for minutes there. So maybe instead of Knecht OR JHS, just change it to Reddish and 2 Lakers 2nds going to Chi with Rui and Vincent. That nets the Bulls 3 2nds, and they can maybe use 1 of those to attach to Torrey Craig heading to Det for a fake 2nd back. I imagine Craig would be more use as a veteran presence for Detroit, who seem to want to shoot for the playoffs, than for the Bulls who seem to be biding their time for now.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,682
And1: 9,238
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#19 » by Dez » Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:58 am

JRoy wrote:
Dez wrote:Feels like Portland give very little to get back their pick.

I feel like they should throw in a 2nd or two to the Lakers.


Absolutely not.

That pick will most likely convey as a SRP.


That's irrelevant, the Blazers give up nothing of value to get flexibility with their pick.

You have to give to get.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Lakers-Bulls-Blazers 

Post#20 » by JRoy » Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:21 am

Dez wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Dez wrote:Feels like Portland give very little to get back their pick.

I feel like they should throw in a 2nd or two to the Lakers.


Absolutely not.

That pick will most likely convey as a SRP.


That's irrelevant, the Blazers give up nothing of value to get flexibility with their pick.

You have to give to get.


Cool.

POR can work out another deal with CHI and LAL can find another dance partner.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.

Return to Trades and Transactions