MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?)

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,419
And1: 14,164
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#1 » by HornetJail » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:26 pm

Wolves trade: Randle, Garza, Ingles
Wolves receive: Oubre, Caleb Martin, Yabusele (~$15M immediate cap relief, major lux tax savings)

Sixers trade: Oubre, Martin, Martin, Yabusele, Gordon, 2027 MIL 2nd, 2029 PHI 2nd
Sixers receive: Randle, Ingles

Wiz trade: nothing
Wiz receive: Gordon, KJ Martin, Garza, 2 2nds

--

Wolves pull the plug on Randle and pull themselves within a couple million of ducking the 2nd apron. Oubre and Martin are on bite sized contracts and can play wing minutes while Yabu can eat a few forward minutes.

Sixers just add talent however they can. they're capped out forever anyway, so his contract situation isn't that much of a deterrent here. Maybe they can make something happen with Maxey/McCain/PG/Randle/Embiid

Washington leverages a TPE to gain 2 2nds from teams that are likely to be in a decline by the time they convey.
investigate Adam Silver
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,945
And1: 13,879
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#2 » by Godaddycurse » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:30 pm

This is illegal for sixers, they are sending out 29M and receiving 35M
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#3 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:33 pm

I harp on teams having 4 or 5 guys they can just waive at any time, but this is really testing that with Washington lol.

But also, that's really bad on court for Minnesota. I can't see them ready to punt to this degree.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
tsarcast
Ballboy
Posts: 35
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 10, 2023
       

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#4 » by tsarcast » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:16 pm

why would sixers gut their wing depth for randle. he'd be a bad fit here too. it's not even like he's an ironman either to help with the injury woes if the idea is we have to consolidate some contracts to get a guy to carry the load on O into a playin spot at all costs.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,063
And1: 7,434
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#5 » by nykballa2k4 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:24 pm

tsarcast wrote:why would sixers gut their wing depth for randle. he'd be a bad fit here too. it's not even like he's an ironman either to help with the injury woes if the idea is we have to consolidate some contracts to get a guy to carry the load on O into a playin spot at all costs.

I tinkered with Randle to PHI, but Oubre is really important to what you guys are doing at the moment. Really can't afford to tie up money like that. I agree with you 100% on that portion of it.

The fit in general of Randle would be good, but the only way to obtain him is with Paul George. No matter how bad it is in Minni, even if they COULD aggregate - I don't think many teams would want this PG on his current contract.


If the Wolves want to deal Randle, not sure what sort of a return they would want
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#6 » by wolves_89 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:28 pm

I don't see the Wolves dumping Randle and punting the season. My guess is Randle will be available, but only in a deal that makes sense (which this deal definitely does not). I think the absolute minimum requirements for a Randle trade would be the Wolves getting back a rotation caliber big who fits and taking back less that $20M in guaranteed salary for next season (with none of the 2025-26 salary being unwanted/dead money).
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,057
And1: 5,694
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#7 » by winforlose » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:04 pm

wolves_89 wrote:I don't see the Wolves dumping Randle and punting the season. My guess is Randle will be available, but only in a deal that makes sense (which this deal definitely does not). I think the absolute minimum requirements for a Randle trade would be the Wolves getting back a rotation caliber big who fits and taking back less that $20M in guaranteed salary for next season (with none of the 2025-26 salary being unwanted/dead money).


I like the outgoing, I don’t love the incoming. But, I think that changing the destination of Oubre to team looking for guard help, and Martin and GY to a team looking for cap relief could be a step towards a better trade. The Wolves primary needs are a starting quality PG, and a rookie scale or value contract backup C with some floor spacing. The Detroit 1st and Utah seconds are assets available in the reimagined trade.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,110
And1: 10,314
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#8 » by the_process » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:29 pm

Sixers are out.

Zero interest in Randle.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#9 » by HartfordWhalers » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:49 pm

Randle seems a bad fit and guts the team if they are healthy. And if not, he doesn't matter.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,212
And1: 2,778
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#10 » by pcbothwel » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:12 pm

wolves_89 wrote:I don't see the Wolves dumping Randle and punting the season. My guess is Randle will be available, but only in a deal that makes sense (which this deal definitely does not). I think the absolute minimum requirements for a Randle trade would be the Wolves getting back a rotation caliber big who fits and taking back less that $20M in guaranteed salary for next season (with none of the 2025-26 salary being unwanted/dead money).


I've thought for a while that Kuz for Randle swap could have some legs, with Randle going to a 3rd team
Minnesota gets a talent downgrade, but a good fit and someone willing to take a smaller role while also saving 40M+ in lux tax payments this year. They then have Kuz on a 2/40M contract for the following two years.

Wiz eat 10M in salary in order to garner the more talented player on an expiring contract, in hopes that they can net a 1st from a contender.
Again, it would depend on the market for Randle (Zero idea)
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#11 » by wolves_89 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:16 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I don't see the Wolves dumping Randle and punting the season. My guess is Randle will be available, but only in a deal that makes sense (which this deal definitely does not). I think the absolute minimum requirements for a Randle trade would be the Wolves getting back a rotation caliber big who fits and taking back less that $20M in guaranteed salary for next season (with none of the 2025-26 salary being unwanted/dead money).


I've thought for a while that Kuz for Randle swap could have some legs, with Randle going to a 3rd team
Minnesota gets a talent downgrade, but a good fit and someone willing to take a smaller role while also saving 40M+ in lux tax payments this year. They then have Kuz on a 2/40M contract for the following two years.

Wiz eat 10M in salary in order to garner the more talented player on an expiring contract, in hopes that they can net a 1st from a contender.
Again, it would depend on the market for Randle (Zero idea)


I don't see Kuzma as a particularly good fit for the Wolves, plus he makes too much to really help Minnesota's financial situation. The Wolves would be better off keeping Randle and seeing if he picks up his player option.
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,891
And1: 370
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: MIN/PHI/WAS shakeup (Is the Randle experiment at this stage yet?) 

Post#12 » by schaffy » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I don't see the Wolves dumping Randle and punting the season. My guess is Randle will be available, but only in a deal that makes sense (which this deal definitely does not). I think the absolute minimum requirements for a Randle trade would be the Wolves getting back a rotation caliber big who fits and taking back less that $20M in guaranteed salary for next season (with none of the 2025-26 salary being unwanted/dead money).


I've thought for a while that Kuz for Randle swap could have some legs, with Randle going to a 3rd team
Minnesota gets a talent downgrade, but a good fit and someone willing to take a smaller role while also saving 40M+ in lux tax payments this year. They then have Kuz on a 2/40M contract for the following two years.

Wiz eat 10M in salary in order to garner the more talented player on an expiring contract, in hopes that they can net a 1st from a contender.
Again, it would depend on the market for Randle (Zero idea)


Is he willing to do that? He was given the option to get moved to Dallas last year and he declined it. After the fact he claimed it was because he didn't think they were a championship contender and that only a handful of teams were in his mind. And at the time, Dallas didnt really look like one, but they also were a heck of a lot better team than the one he was one. If he's only willing to potentially take on a lesser role on a clear championship level team vs a good playoff team, it seems like he's just as fine to keep getting his - which is his right.

Return to Trades and Transactions