Mavs/Blazers
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Mavs/Blazers
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,375
- And1: 98,223
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Mavs/Blazers
Thompson
Kleber
Powell
Exum
25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant
Reath
Banton
Blazers get a lightly protected first out of Grant and shed some long-term money. And if there is still a team that would take Klay for an expiring, shed even more.
Mavs trust the Vegas guys will spend big and re-sign Grimes next year and trust Grant is still solid, just hates that he signed to play with Dame just to play meaningless basketball instead. Reath is emergency depth to replace Powell and Banton fights with Dinwiddie/Hardy for backup guard minutes. Have to play with 14 for now. But have been doing that essentially with Exum anyway.
Kleber
Powell
Exum
25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant
Reath
Banton
Blazers get a lightly protected first out of Grant and shed some long-term money. And if there is still a team that would take Klay for an expiring, shed even more.
Mavs trust the Vegas guys will spend big and re-sign Grimes next year and trust Grant is still solid, just hates that he signed to play with Dame just to play meaningless basketball instead. Reath is emergency depth to replace Powell and Banton fights with Dinwiddie/Hardy for backup guard minutes. Have to play with 14 for now. But have been doing that essentially with Exum anyway.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,831
- And1: 7,801
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Send Klay to LAL for Vincent, JHS, Wood (they can take back a small min there) just so Dallas does right by Klay? Everyone always points out that Dallas is trading Kay too early when I suggest them, so trade him to a place he will be as happy/happier than where he currently is..
Yes, that complicates the OP and changes nothing about the fair trade.
Portland gets a first and save long term money. Good, probably too good for them.
Dallas gets a starting forward that hopefully is magically healthy again once he is playing in games that matter.
Yes, that complicates the OP and changes nothing about the fair trade.
Portland gets a first and save long term money. Good, probably too good for them.
Dallas gets a starting forward that hopefully is magically healthy again once he is playing in games that matter.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,544
- And1: 13,900
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Top ten protection on the pick seems more fair.
Yes for POR.
Yes for POR.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Senior
- Posts: 654
- And1: 373
- Joined: Sep 15, 2020
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Think it's a bit of an overpay by Dallas, but the fit seems good. I think Portland could flip Klay for a different bad contract and get another small asset.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,945
- And1: 13,879
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
I like it. Also think protection should be higher. Maybe lotto protected that turns into both 2nds
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,854
- And1: 1,347
- Joined: Mar 25, 2016
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
At first I thought a 1st for Banton was kind of steep, then I saw Grant is in there to, so guess it makes it ok.
That aside, if motivation is problem - and it could very well be - pumped up Grant should be an upgrade over Klay, and I think Banton could play some backup SF with Marshall playing PF in stretches.
That aside, if motivation is problem - and it could very well be - pumped up Grant should be an upgrade over Klay, and I think Banton could play some backup SF with Marshall playing PF in stretches.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,543
- And1: 1,253
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Texas Chuck wrote:Thompson
Kleber
Powell
Exum
25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant
Reath
Banton
Blazers get a lightly protected first out of Grant and shed some long-term money. And if there is still a team that would take Klay for an expiring, shed even more.
Mavs trust the Vegas guys will spend big and re-sign Grimes next year and trust Grant is still solid, just hates that he signed to play with Dame just to play meaningless basketball instead. Reath is emergency depth to replace Powell and Banton fights with Dinwiddie/Hardy for backup guard minutes. Have to play with 14 for now. But have been doing that essentially with Exum anyway.
I would go for something like this... with 1 small changes.
Swap Exum (or Powell Exum) for OMax. This give Portland a little more youth to potentially develop.
End result would be:
Dallas - $33.7M
Thompson
Kleber
Powell
OMax
25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Portland - $34.0M
Grant
Reath
Banton
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Forum Mod - Blazers
- Posts: 14,612
- And1: 6,605
- Joined: Mar 11, 2010
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Don't see Portland doing any better than this.
I also think Grant would look far better on a competent team with something to play for. He actually started off the year playing some really good defense and let the foot off the gas when it was clear there was no reason to here but I think he would make other teams miserable as a 3rd option in the playoffs. He is good enough that if he was the type of player to always play his best Portland would have no trouble with offers but I do think there is another level to his game that isn't showcased well in this hopeless situation.
I also think Grant would look far better on a competent team with something to play for. He actually started off the year playing some really good defense and let the foot off the gas when it was clear there was no reason to here but I think he would make other teams miserable as a 3rd option in the playoffs. He is good enough that if he was the type of player to always play his best Portland would have no trouble with offers but I do think there is another level to his game that isn't showcased well in this hopeless situation.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,139
- And1: 1,199
- Joined: Jul 05, 2023
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Could this trade be simplified?
DAL is only $330k under the 1st apron
POR is $3.7mil under luxury tax threshold
Assuming both want to stay in those areas
Also, does DAL want to deal Klay away? I would think they would want to keep him? Gafford's name has come up as a player DAL would potentially be ok with dealing in the right trade and they have Washington\Lively
What about this
POR trades Grant\Banton (could be Walker or Reath, maybe even Murray)
for
Gafford\Kleber\Marshall + 25' 1st (lotto protected) - Currently pick is @ #18
POR would have to waive or trade a player - likely (1) of Banton\Reath\Walker - Reath could be dealt for a 2nd rounder (as per rumors)
By including (1) of Banton\Walker\Reath, DAL saves about $1mil more cushion under the 1st apron, POR can absorb the extra $1mil. If it was Murray it would only be $182k or so savings.
Gafford & Kleber expire after next season, Marshall the year after. Interesting thing about dealing for Gafford\Kleber is they would be a combined $25.4 off the books for POR next offseason, which just happens to coincide with Simons\RW3\Ayton & Thybulle, which is $88mil combined, meaning potentially $113mil off the books, that might be worth including Murray for.
DAL is only $330k under the 1st apron
POR is $3.7mil under luxury tax threshold
Assuming both want to stay in those areas
Also, does DAL want to deal Klay away? I would think they would want to keep him? Gafford's name has come up as a player DAL would potentially be ok with dealing in the right trade and they have Washington\Lively
What about this
POR trades Grant\Banton (could be Walker or Reath, maybe even Murray)
for
Gafford\Kleber\Marshall + 25' 1st (lotto protected) - Currently pick is @ #18
POR would have to waive or trade a player - likely (1) of Banton\Reath\Walker - Reath could be dealt for a 2nd rounder (as per rumors)
By including (1) of Banton\Walker\Reath, DAL saves about $1mil more cushion under the 1st apron, POR can absorb the extra $1mil. If it was Murray it would only be $182k or so savings.
Gafford & Kleber expire after next season, Marshall the year after. Interesting thing about dealing for Gafford\Kleber is they would be a combined $25.4 off the books for POR next offseason, which just happens to coincide with Simons\RW3\Ayton & Thybulle, which is $88mil combined, meaning potentially $113mil off the books, that might be worth including Murray for.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,281
- And1: 1,405
- Joined: May 27, 2007
Re: Mavs/Blazers
It's a yes from this Portland fan.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,329
- And1: 1,520
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Yeah, I'm totally down for the Blazers.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,820
- And1: 1,580
- Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Yes as well, nicely done
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,831
- And1: 7,801
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Walton1one wrote:Could this trade be simplified?
DAL is only $330k under the 1st apron
POR is $3.7mil under luxury tax threshold
Assuming both want to stay in those areas
Also, does DAL want to deal Klay away? I would think they would want to keep him? Gafford's name has come up as a player DAL would potentially be ok with dealing in the right trade and they have Washington\Lively
What about this
POR trades Grant\Banton (could be Walker or Reath, maybe even Murray)
for
Gafford\Kleber\Marshall + 25' 1st (lotto protected) - Currently pick is @ #18
POR would have to waive or trade a player - likely (1) of Banton\Reath\Walker - Reath could be dealt for a 2nd rounder (as per rumors)
By including (1) of Banton\Walker\Reath, DAL saves about $1mil more cushion under the 1st apron, POR can absorb the extra $1mil. If it was Murray it would only be $182k or so savings.
Gafford & Kleber expire after next season, Marshall the year after. Interesting thing about dealing for Gafford\Kleber is they would be a combined $25.4 off the books for POR next offseason, which just happens to coincide with Simons\RW3\Ayton & Thybulle, which is $88mil combined, meaning potentially $113mil off the books, that might be worth including Murray for.
I don’t see how Grant can have this value. Klay inclusion is why Dallas needs to pay a first..
Gafford and Marshall are good value.
And Dallas doesn’t want to trade Gafford, but he’s their most valuable available decent sized salary. Even if he’s not very valuable.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,375
- And1: 98,223
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
That Walton counter feels like something Dallas couldn't consider based on talent and value.
The tester swap is closer, but the money is really tight for Dallas. Prosper might could come in for Exum, but not for Powell. But the other issue is most people even Blazer fans seem to think the value is right or slightly too good for Portland. This adds (not much, but a little) more value to Portland so seems unnecessary.
The tester swap is closer, but the money is really tight for Dallas. Prosper might could come in for Exum, but not for Powell. But the other issue is most people even Blazer fans seem to think the value is right or slightly too good for Portland. This adds (not much, but a little) more value to Portland so seems unnecessary.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,281
- And1: 1,405
- Joined: May 27, 2007
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Texas Chuck wrote:That Walton counter feels like something Dallas couldn't consider based on talent and value.
The tester swap is closer, but the money is really tight for Dallas. Prosper might could come in for Exum, but not for Powell. But the other issue is most people even Blazer fans seem to think the value is right or slightly too good for Portland. This adds (not much, but a little) more value to Portland so seems unnecessary.
Agreed, don't need to hunt for added value in a young guy for Portland. Leave him there in case Dallas can or will send him out for more help elsewhere.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,543
- And1: 1,253
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Mavs/Blazers
jayjaysee wrote:Send Klay to LAL for Vincent, JHS, Wood (they can take back a small min there) just so Dallas does right by Klay? Everyone always points out that Dallas is trading Kay too early when I suggest them, so trade him to a place he will be as happy/happier than where he currently is..
Yes, that complicates the OP and changes nothing about the fair trade.
Portland gets a first and save long term money. Good, probably too good for them.
Dallas gets a starting forward that hopefully is magically healthy again once he is playing in games that matter.
I like this suggestion of Klay going to LAL.
Would Lakers be willing to do
Klay + Powell <-> Vando + Christie
Maybe bring the Kings in too.
Something like this:
Dallas - $33.7M out $34.0M in
Thompson + Kleber + Powell + OMax + 25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant + Reath + Banton
Lakers - $17.8M out $17.9M in
Vando + Christie
for
Thompson + Len
Kings - $18.9M out $22.0M in
Huerter + Len
for
Kleber + Thybulle
Blazers - $45.0M out $41.5M in
Grant + Banton + Reath + Thybulle + Walker[cut]
for
Huerter + Vando + Christie + Powell + OMax + 25 Dal 1st
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,281
- And1: 1,405
- Joined: May 27, 2007
Re: Mavs/Blazers
tester551 wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Send Klay to LAL for Vincent, JHS, Wood (they can take back a small min there) just so Dallas does right by Klay? Everyone always points out that Dallas is trading Kay too early when I suggest them, so trade him to a place he will be as happy/happier than where he currently is..
Yes, that complicates the OP and changes nothing about the fair trade.
Portland gets a first and save long term money. Good, probably too good for them.
Dallas gets a starting forward that hopefully is magically healthy again once he is playing in games that matter.
I like this suggestion of Klay going to LAL.
Would Lakers be willing to do
Klay + Powell <-> Vando + Christie
Maybe bring the Kings in too.
Something like this:
Dallas - $33.7M out $34.0M in
Thompson + Kleber + Powell + OMax + 25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant + Reath + Banton
Lakers - $17.8M out $17.9M in
Vando + Christie
for
Thompson + Len
Kings - $18.9M out $22.0M in
Huerter + Len
for
Kleber + Thybulle
Blazers - $45.0M out $41.5M in
Grant + Banton + Reath + Thybulle + Walker[cut]
for
Huerter + Vando + Christie + Powell + OMax + 25 Dal 1st
I believe Laker fans here have been pretty happy with Christie. Doubt they'd go for this.
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,139
- And1: 1,199
- Joined: Jul 05, 2023
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Texas Chuck wrote:That Walton counter feels like something Dallas couldn't consider based on talent and value.
The tester swap is closer, but the money is really tight for Dallas. Prosper might could come in for Exum, but not for Powell. But the other issue is most people even Blazer fans seem to think the value is right or slightly too good for Portland. This adds (not much, but a little) more value to Portland so seems unnecessary.
I am surprised, but ok. I guess I don't see why DAL would look to move off of Klay this fast, but if that is the case, I would gladly accept your original deal
I am pretty confident POR could find\flip Klay to another team for more assets
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,831
- And1: 7,801
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Mavs/Blazers
tester551 wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Send Klay to LAL for Vincent, JHS, Wood (they can take back a small min there) just so Dallas does right by Klay? Everyone always points out that Dallas is trading Kay too early when I suggest them, so trade him to a place he will be as happy/happier than where he currently is..
Yes, that complicates the OP and changes nothing about the fair trade.
Portland gets a first and save long term money. Good, probably too good for them.
Dallas gets a starting forward that hopefully is magically healthy again once he is playing in games that matter.
I like this suggestion of Klay going to LAL.
Would Lakers be willing to do
Klay + Powell <-> Vando + Christie
Maybe bring the Kings in too.
Something like this:
Dallas - $33.7M out $34.0M in
Thompson + Kleber + Powell + OMax + 25 DAL 1st (top 4, then better of DEN/PHI 2nd)
for
Grant + Reath + Banton
Lakers - $17.8M out $17.9M in
Vando + Christie
for
Thompson + Len
Kings - $18.9M out $22.0M in
Huerter + Len
for
Kleber + Thybulle
Blazers - $45.0M out $41.5M in
Grant + Banton + Reath + Thybulle + Walker[cut]
for
Huerter + Vando + Christie + Powell + OMax + 25 Dal 1st
Don’t think LAL trades Christie to get out of Vando’s last year. That seems to be the only difference and I’d guess they just use Vincent and hope Vando comes back decent..
Re: Mavs/Blazers
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,993
- And1: 3,567
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
-
Re: Mavs/Blazers
Another yep for the OG trade, TC...
Return to Trades and Transactions