Tor / Phx
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Tor / Phx
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,786
- And1: 72,141
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Tor / Phx
Boucher for Nurkic and 1st
Phx gets an expiring bench player who can produce and get out next year of Nurkic
Raps get a 1st for Boucher (which is great) and eat Nurkic's contract.
edit: changed brown to boucher since I was told Phx. can't take back more salary.
Phx gets an expiring bench player who can produce and get out next year of Nurkic
Raps get a 1st for Boucher (which is great) and eat Nurkic's contract.
edit: changed brown to boucher since I was told Phx. can't take back more salary.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,311
- And1: 18,424
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Tor / Phx
I don't think Phoenix cares enough about savings to do this. They have bigger goals that are likely unrealistic, but that's neither here nor there. They're not trading a first to save a bit of cash.
Re: Tor / Phx
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,786
- And1: 72,141
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Tor / Phx
BBallFreak wrote:I don't think Phoenix cares enough about savings to do this. They have bigger goals that are likely unrealistic, but that's neither here nor there. They're not trading a first to save a bit of cash.
Was basing it off this tweet.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,311
- And1: 18,424
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Duffman100 wrote:BBallFreak wrote:I don't think Phoenix cares enough about savings to do this. They have bigger goals that are likely unrealistic, but that's neither here nor there. They're not trading a first to save a bit of cash.
Was basing it off this tweet.
Do you honestly think this is about savings? Or are they trying to get a better player? I think the answer is pretty obvious based on everything they've done since Ishibia took over the team.
Re: Tor / Phx
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,786
- And1: 72,141
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Tor / Phx
BBallFreak wrote:Duffman100 wrote:BBallFreak wrote:I don't think Phoenix cares enough about savings to do this. They have bigger goals that are likely unrealistic, but that's neither here nor there. They're not trading a first to save a bit of cash.
Was basing it off this tweet.
Do you honestly think this is about savings? Or are they trying to get a better player? I think the answer is pretty obvious based on everything they've done since Ishibia took over the team.
I don't think a late first and asking a team to eat a 20 million dollar next year is going to get them a much better player.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,311
- And1: 18,424
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Duffman100 wrote:BBallFreak wrote:
Do you honestly think this is about savings? Or are they trying to get a better player? I think the answer is pretty obvious based on everything they've done since Ishibia took over the team.
I don't think a late first and asking a team to eat a 20 million dollar next year is going to get them a much better player.
I think you're wrong. I think they'll take back bad money for a player they like. They're not just offloading, here. There's no way.
Re: Tor / Phx
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,786
- And1: 72,141
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Tor / Phx
BBallFreak wrote:Duffman100 wrote:BBallFreak wrote:Do you honestly think this is about savings? Or are they trying to get a better player? I think the answer is pretty obvious based on everything they've done since Ishibia took over the team.
I don't think a late first and asking a team to eat a 20 million dollar next year is going to get them a much better player.
I think you're wrong. I think they'll take back bad money for a player they like. They're not just offloading, here. There's no way.
It's not so much I'm wrong, but Evan Sidery

Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,006
- And1: 8,485
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Tor / Phx
TOR should do this. Not only do they get a FRP for an expiring Boucher, but it helps the tank this year. Cap wise it fits this year and next (although TOR would probably have to pass on using the NTMLE in July)
PHO should do this. They may be suffering from delusions that they can compete, but reality says otherwise
PHO should do this. They may be suffering from delusions that they can compete, but reality says otherwise
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,804
- And1: 35,886
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Does this put the Raptors into the tax?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,006
- And1: 8,485
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Tor / Phx
jbk1234 wrote:Does this put the Raptors into the tax?
No (tried it on spotrac to verify)
It uses up $7.3 of the $9.9M TOR has under the luxury tax. They'd even have an open roster spot and enough room to convert Battle from a 2-way to a regular contract
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Tor / Phx
boucher, mitchell for nurkic, 1st
Re: Tor / Phx
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,786
- And1: 72,141
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Tor / Phx
ReggiesKnicks wrote:boucher, mitchell for nurkic, 1st
I'm good with that too.
Re: Tor / Phx
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,374
- And1: 98,222
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Tor / Phx
If Boucher agrees to say a 2 year extension at similar money as part of this, then okay. I also think they should get to call around the league and see what players are available for free than fit in the delta between Nurk's money and Boucher's. And if that player costs a future 2nd, Toronto should gladly pay it. If not the Suns can just take the 8 figures of real money savings.
Without an extension I like it less as I agree with Freak, the goal is to use Nurk to get help, not dump his final year.
Without an extension I like it less as I agree with Freak, the goal is to use Nurk to get help, not dump his final year.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 862
- Joined: May 09, 2016
-
Re: Tor / Phx
"Whether or not the Suns and Hawks can find common ground on a deal that would send Bogdanovic to Phoenix revolves around where Nurkic could potentially end up. It isn't expected that the Hawks would be taking on Nurkic's contract, which would make this scenario involve at least one more team.
The Washington Wizards, Charlotte Hornets, Detroit Pistons, and Toronto Raptors are all organizations that have signaled to rival teams that they are willing to take on contracts for draft capital at the trade deadline."
The Washington Wizards, Charlotte Hornets, Detroit Pistons, and Toronto Raptors are all organizations that have signaled to rival teams that they are willing to take on contracts for draft capital at the trade deadline."
Re: Tor / Phx
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,374
- And1: 98,222
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Bogdan is a really weird target. Even if they think they have a Beal taker, just give Allen back starter's minutes like he should have.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,938
- And1: 13,870
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Texas Chuck wrote:Bogdan is a really weird target. Even if they think they have a Beal taker, just give Allen back starter's minutes like he should have.
unless allen is outgoing too... the plot thickens
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,006
- And1: 8,485
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Texas Chuck wrote:If Boucher agrees to say a 2 year extension at similar money as part of this, then okay. I also think they should get to call around the league and see what players are available for free than fit in the delta between Nurk's money and Boucher's. And if that player costs a future 2nd, Toronto should gladly pay it. If not the Suns can just take the 8 figures of real money savings.
Without an extension I like it less as I agree with Freak, the goal is to use Nurk to get help, not dump his final year.
I'd be cautious about extending Boucher. He's having a good stretch of games, but he's had those before, and it has usually taken him awhile to learn/adjust to new schemes and teammates so I have no idea how he'd look in PHO. I can see him being moved as a rental, or as a money move, but Boucher is still the player he has always been: long, energetic and often maddeningly inconsistent.
I know I am suggesting something that Ishbia just won't do, but as I said above, I think PHO should accept reality. For PHO, they will probably hold on to the various "trade Beal for Jimmy" scenarios until the dealine Could this Nurkic-for-Boucher idea help with that? Probably the only way it becomes likely.
Maybe if they can't get Jimmy, and can't move Beal, does PHO do this to save money, possibly flipping Boucher for a minor asset and/or saving even more money?
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,006
- And1: 8,485
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Tor / Phx
Godaddycurse wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Bogdan is a really weird target. Even if they think they have a Beal taker, just give Allen back starter's minutes like he should have.
unless allen is outgoing too... the plot thickens
Allen in DET makes some sense, and DET would have to send back a semi-useful guy (probably Fontecchio) to make the money work, and might offer up a batch of SRPs to grease other wheels
But yeah, I have Bogdan as about the last type of player PHO needs to add
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,052
- And1: 739
- Joined: Nov 05, 2012
Re: Tor / Phx
I would do this trade in a heart beat. Especially if it’s for 2025 1st.
Re: Tor / Phx
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 32
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jan 18, 2025
Re: Tor / Phx
If im Toronto I do this in a heartbeat. However Phoenix wouldn’t be interested in any of this. They could care less about any cap savings. Their owner is like the Joker from The Dark Knight when he burns the Mob’s pile of cash, it isn’t about money it’s about sending a message. And the message is that he’s win-now all the way to his deathbed. He seems determined to go all-in max bet every hand. Obviously we could argue that this is a bad idea but it doesn’t matter, it’s the path they have chosen.
The other thing is that Bogdan is the last type of player on Earth they would pursue. Booker, Beal, and Allen are all that type of player but better, there’s zero need for that. They need 4’s and 5’s, no more guards
The other thing is that Bogdan is the last type of player on Earth they would pursue. Booker, Beal, and Allen are all that type of player but better, there’s zero need for that. They need 4’s and 5’s, no more guards
Return to Trades and Transactions