HAWKS
In:Randle/Hayes/JHS
Out:Capela/Bogdan
OO/Hayes
Randle/Nance
Hunter/Risacher
Daniels/Mathews
Trae/JHS
They do not have control of their selection neither this nor next year, they fill the huge hole that Johnson's injury leaves in PF with a former allstar. They do not spend future assets, nor do they become more expensive, while they remain competitive
LAKERS
In:Capela/Banton/Reath
Out: Hachimura/Wood/JHS/Hayes
AD/Capela
Lebron/Vandervilt
DFS/Knecht
Reaves/Reddish
Vincent/Banton
They get the solid veteran center they're looking for and a couple of cheap, useful role players. They save money for next year.
MAGIC
In:Bogdanovic
Out:Harris/Mo Wagner
Goga/Isaak/WCJ
Banchelo/Isaak
Wagner/Silva
KCP/Bogdan
Suggs/CAntonhy/Black
They obtain the shooter they are missing, without spending assets, or sending any young people
They can probably bring Mo back in the offseason
WOLVES
In:J.Grant/Wood
Out:Randle
Gobert/Wood
Grant/Reid
McDaniels/Naw
Edwards/Donte
Conley/Dillingham
Grant is a better fit...although his contract is longer, they save a few million this and next year (I assume Randle opts to participate)
BLAZERS
In: Hachimura/Wagner/Harris
Out:J.Grant/Reath/Banton
They get a younger wing, which could be part of the future core, while reducing expenses practically by half
Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,374
- And1: 98,221
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
For something this big its not too bad. I think it makes reasonable sense for everyone but Minnesota who simply can't afford Grant long-term.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
- Mrakar
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,099
- And1: 3,902
- Joined: Sep 01, 2010
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Trade in general doesnt look that bad but as someone already wrote Wolves cant afford Grant for 4 years. I think they will more go in direction to split Randle into couple role players. Backup center(Reid as starter) and a wing for Randle is something they will need to do for finances to work.
Also Grant is not that great of a player. He was putting up the stats on bad teams untill he got overpayed, now he is not even doing that.
Also Grant is not that great of a player. He was putting up the stats on bad teams untill he got overpayed, now he is not even doing that.
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,879
- And1: 1,908
- Joined: Dec 27, 2015
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
magic cant afford his money next yr with his injury history and rather bring back moe next yr...and no can not afford both ..without moving a few players under contract next yr..harris is not one of them..and not worth money ,tax and assets to do that
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,398
- And1: 17,183
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Wolves traded KAT to reduce their payroll, they can't revert that for much lesser player in Jerami Grant.
Wolves can take Hachimura and use Pistons 1st to dump Harris/Wagner, and save a fortune.
Wolves can take Hachimura and use Pistons 1st to dump Harris/Wagner, and save a fortune.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,785
- And1: 10,442
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Yes for Portland.
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,103
- And1: 4,585
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Clear no for Minnesota. There's not much appeal for a deal that makes the team worse in the short term while also being absolutely brutal for their long term financial situation.
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
- PDXKnight
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,152
- And1: 3,110
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Portland
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Myth wrote:Yes for Portland.
Yup!
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,891
- And1: 370
- Joined: Jun 20, 2007
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
I can see Grant as a different fit but I'm not entirely sure I'd say better. He is a better defender and outside shooter, but he's a worse rebounder and on ball creator -- 2 areas the wolves don't exactly thrive in to begin with right now.
Plus his contract makes this a pretty firm No.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Plus his contract makes this a pretty firm No.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,508
- And1: 6,583
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Texas Chuck wrote:For something this big its not too bad. I think it makes reasonable sense for everyone but Minnesota who simply can't afford Grant long-term.
This.
Feels like the Wolves are here just so that the Hawks don't have to eat Grant's contract. I'd just cut the Wolves out
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,953
- And1: 1,203
- Joined: Oct 14, 2004
-
Re: Hawks/Lakers/Magic/Wolves/Blazers
Cut Minnesota out. Don’t want Grant.
Return to Trades and Transactions