[Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,551
And1: 6,188
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

[Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#1 » by gswhoops » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:28 pm

https://bsky.app/profile/shamsbot.bsky.social/post/3lh4zth5sps2v

“FROM SHAMS:

The Los Angeles Clippers are trading PJ Tucker, Mo Bamba, a future second-round pick and cash to the Utah Jazz for Drew Eubanks and Patty Mills, sources tell me and @BobbyMarks42.”
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,374
And1: 98,222
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:30 pm

Would have thought the clippers could do better. But okay

Sent from my SM-A156U using RealGM mobile app
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#3 » by HartfordWhalers » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:35 pm

Saves 6.6m in salary?
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#4 » by ejftw » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:36 pm

Bamba was starting to play well too, and Eubanks isn't much, if at all, better. Mills is just leftover free agent but has a good attitude that could help the bench and fit in.

Def thought Bones would be packaged with PJ.

At work, but wonder what the cap/LT savings are
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,901
And1: 1,238
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#5 » by wemby » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:37 pm

Damn, that blew the Fox deal out of the water.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,831
And1: 7,801
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#6 » by jayjaysee » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:42 pm

Good deal for LAC. Had hoped they’d get aggressive since some of their guys are playing so well. But getting under the tax is smart.

Utah is a meh. There’s not much value for cap space, so get some while you can.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,921
And1: 11,735
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#7 » by eminence » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:45 pm

Don't mind it for Utah, opens up a bit of money next year, grabs a second.

Wonder if PJ will take a buyout here.
I bought a boat.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,542
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#8 » by JRoy » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:47 pm

+1 for title
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,740
And1: 24,968
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#9 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:47 pm

Don’t really get it for Utah. I guess it’s fine.

Solid enough for LAC.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,911
And1: 12,056
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#10 » by LightTheBeam » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:51 pm

Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,953
And1: 1,203
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#11 » by jscott » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:52 pm

The first domino has fallen.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#12 » by ejftw » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:56 pm

LightTheBeam wrote:Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?


It's less about limits, and more about the fact the new CBA would have a tight chokehold on the team's chances. Basically, he has no issues with spending, but doesn't mean he spends stupidly.

I have little doubt that with the old CBA, George would have been offered the max.

Thank god that addition by subtraction happened tho
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,707
And1: 17,778
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#13 » by MartinToVaught » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:05 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Would have thought the clippers could do better. But okay

PJ has no trade value at all. I'm amazed we even got anyone as playable as Eubanks in return.

LightTheBeam wrote:Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?

This is less of a spending issue and more just moving off of a player who's been a malcontent since the day he arrived. Tucker is pushing 40 and has been unplayable for years now, but still feels entitled to rotation minutes and has thrown tantrums in public about it. Keep in mind, you have to be excruciatingly bad as a veteran player in your late 30s for Ty Lue of all coaches to send you home rather than give you minutes over younger players.

We also needed a backup big and Bamba just wasn't good enough.
Image
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,547
And1: 1,993
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#14 » by chrbal » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:05 pm

Clippers save money and add useful depth
Jazz get cash and a pick to buyout Tucker (should retire) and let Mo be depth for the rest of the season. Nothing exciting, but it makes sense

<insert “and here we go” gif>
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#15 » by ejftw » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:06 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=oLQmDElb_tRxLQM1fWFcrw&s=19

Read on Twitter
?t=URViWOXFKCMqX5q6U9bNKA&s=19

Ducking tax while adding a TPE, albeit small. Wonder if its the 30 or 31 second.
Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,631
And1: 1,640
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#16 » by Bentley1225 » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:07 pm

Some form of get under the tax apron deal was coming by trying to upgrade depth from Clippers. I guess this is best they could do
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,285
And1: 30,517
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#17 » by Domejandro » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:10 pm

Getting under the Luxury-Tax at the cost of a single second was a great move by the Los Angeles Clippers, especially while also receiving back some alright depth.

Also think it is good for Utah, cheap pick acquisition. They can easily trade the second for all of the cash back down-the-line.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,911
And1: 12,056
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#18 » by LightTheBeam » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:16 pm

ejftw wrote:
LightTheBeam wrote:Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?


It's less about limits, and more about the fact the new CBA would have a tight chokehold on the team's chances. Basically, he has no issues with spending, but doesn't mean he spends stupidly.

I have little doubt that with the old CBA, George would have been offered the max.

Thank god that addition by subtraction happened tho


I would have thought the Clippers could have easily used Tucker + Mann and/or Bones + that 2nd and went and got another good player. The players are irrelevant the Clippers ducked the tux here. Maybe it pays off in the buyout market, or maybe Balmer saves a few bucks for a year?

And I do think it was a solid move btw. Just saying, Balmer of the past goes and gets another contributor for a playoff run.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#19 » by OGSactownballer » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:24 pm

ejftw wrote:
LightTheBeam wrote:Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?


It's less about limits, and more about the fact the new CBA would have a tight chokehold on the team's chances. Basically, he has no issues with spending, but doesn't mean he spends stupidly.

I have little doubt that with the old CBA, George would have been offered the max.

Thank god that addition by subtraction happened tho


I agree with this.

This is where we are all starting to see that these franchises who overspent and locked themselves up at the aprons are going to have to make salary dumps simply to operate and not be entirely handcuffed.

It’s going to be interesting the change in the NBA landscape over the next few years where even those franchises in big markets who traditionally got what they wanted are not going to have nearly the leverage with a leveled monetary playing field.

The days of going out and just taking on all those massive contracts of aging stars for a shot at a chip are too going to be fading away and team building and valuing draft picks and locked up young talent (like the NFL does now) are going to become the new mantra.

Top GM’s are going to be the key guys for this.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,024
And1: 17,532
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#20 » by babyjax13 » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:27 pm

I'm glad Ainge is making the kind of deals he should have for the last two seasons. Collins and Sexton need to be next.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl

Return to Trades and Transactions