Page 1 of 2

NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 2:58 pm
by MessiahUjiri
So Lakers desperately need a defensive C now.


Guys like Valanciunas aren’t good defensively, but Nic Claxton makes the obvious sense. Nets are willing to forego short term winning.


Something like:

Knecht + 1st + Christie + salaries (Gabe/Vando).
For
Nic Claxton + Watford


What permutation makes the most sense?

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 3:00 pm
by Texas Chuck
Can you please flesh this out making sure its CBA compliant and provide reasons for the Nets as well? Otherwise I can just move it to the random thoughts thread.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 3:05 pm
by MessiahUjiri
Texas Chuck wrote:Can you please flesh this out making sure its CBA compliant and provide reasons for the Nets as well? Otherwise I can just move it to the random thoughts thread.


Done. I think there’s multiple permutations available. Hoping to elicit more feedback and other permutations.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 3:15 pm
by ecuhus1981
That was one of my first thoughts, after processing this insane blockbuster. LA is gonna hunt for a defensive C.

Personally, I don't like receiving Vincent or Hachimura due to their contracts, Brooklyn is trying to free up as much 2025 capspace as possible. But if we can route them to a 3rd team for an expiring, Knecht would be decent enough return for me. Otherwise, you can have Sharpe and a 2nd for Knecht, although some minor outgoing salary for LAL is needed.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 3:29 pm
by jbk1234
Christie and their only available 1st were both traded to Dallas?

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 3:40 pm
by ReggiesKnicks
jbk1234 wrote:Christie and their only available 1st were both traded to Dallas?


Why can't they trade their 2031 1st?

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 4:13 pm
by jbk1234
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Christie and their only available 1st were both traded to Dallas?


Why can't they trade their 2031 1st?


I didn't realize that they traded the 2029 1st. Yeah, they could, but then that would be it and Claxton isn't single handedly saving their defense. There's no one presently on the roster who's a plus defender.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 4:14 pm
by OGSactownballer
I honestly don’t think they have the pieces that BRK would accept.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 4:15 pm
by Texas Chuck
They can afford his trade value for sure. Nets haven't wanted to take on bad money though and that's an issue. But he's not worth more than that 31 pick on that contract.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:08 pm
by scottyg
Maxi Kliber and a 2nd rd pic to the bulls for Javon Carter and Torey Craig

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:14 pm
by Skybox
Goga is their answer....ORL desperately needs playmaking and shooting, so would compromise their starting C and hope to work on the C spot in the summer.

ORL sends: Goga, Jett Howard
LAL sends: Reaves, Knecht

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:19 pm
by mcfly1204
Skybox wrote:Goga is their answer....ORL desperately needs playmaking and shooting, so would compromise their starting C and hope to work on the C spot in the summer.

ORL sends: Goga, Jett Howard
LAL sends: Reaves, Knecht

So you're thinking Goga is worth Reaves and Knecht? If Orlando is really desperate for playmaking, shouldn't the trade be balanced the other way?

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:23 pm
by TheNetsFan
I think Rui+Vincent/Kleber+ '31 FRP for Claxton and a minimum deal works for both parties if the Nets can find someone to take at least one of if the LA players for an expiring. If someone will take both for an expiring, I can see the Nets kicking back the '25 HOU FRP.

Another option could be a variation of the PHX-Utah deal. Something like Sharpe and 2 worst of FRPs for the unprotected '31FRP from LA.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:28 pm
by nzahir
Skybox wrote:Goga is their answer....ORL desperately needs playmaking and shooting, so would compromise their starting C and hope to work on the C spot in the summer.

ORL sends: Goga, Jett Howard
LAL sends: Reaves, Knecht

Reaves is worth more than Goga

Definitely not adding knecht in this deal

And we need a lob threat C, so pass on Goga (who is solid)

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:37 pm
by AmusingFiddle
Lakers will part with more assets now with their future somewhat secured, Baring injuries.

Ainge do us a solid. We gave u a player and 2 picks for NOTHING.

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using RealGM mobile app

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 6:40 pm
by dcstanley
jbk1234 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Christie and their only available 1st were both traded to Dallas?


Why can't they trade their 2031 1st?


I didn't realize that they traded the 2029 1st. Yeah, they could, but then that would be it and Claxton isn't single handedly saving their defense. There's no one presently on the roster who's a plus defender.

DFS, Vanderbilt, and Vincent are all plus defenders

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:19 pm
by jbk1234
dcstanley wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Why can't they trade their 2031 1st?


I didn't realize that they traded the 2029 1st. Yeah, they could, but then that would be it and Claxton isn't single handedly saving their defense. There's no one presently on the roster who's a plus defender.

DFS, Vanderbilt, and Vincent are all plus defenders


At one time in their respective careers, yes, but to say there's been some slippage is to be charitable.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:24 pm
by SlimShady83
Kessler Turner... Claxton earning too much

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:27 pm
by DowJones
As a Cavs fan I would toss in Okoro and Niang to Brooklyn for Rui if the Nets are interested in that. Maybe add a few seconds.

Re: NIC CLAXTON has to be the Lakers next move, right?

Posted: Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:37 pm
by TheNetsFan
DowJones wrote:As a Cavs fan I would toss in Okoro and Niang to Brooklyn for Rui if the Nets are interested in that. Maybe add a few seconds.

The Nets would be looking for an expiring contract or to shed some money in the deal to stay below the tax. LeVert or Okoro/Niang+Wade are better from the Nets perspective. Supposedly, the Nets have had interest in Wade for a while.