PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,334
And1: 9,879
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#1 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Apr 17, 2025 3:48 pm

TRADE 1

Portland Trades
DeAndre Ayton C
Jerami Grant F
Shadeon Sharpe SG
Robert Williams III FC
Kris Murray F
2029 Lowest FRP

Sacramento Trades
Domantas Sabonis F
Zach LaVine G

WHY FOR PORTLAND
They seem to be intent on winning and here they make a win-now move bringing in 2 highly paid but very talented vets on board in Sabonis and Zach. Domantas has familial connections to PDX and would be a fan favorite. His passing and high post offense would be huge with the lanky cutters than PDX has on the roster. Zach has warts but brings scoring at the SG spot to replace Simons and Sharpe (Simons moved in a seperate deal).

WHY FOR SACRAMENTO
They clearly need a shakeup. The prize here is Sharpe who is a young, highly talented player that is a consistent 3PT shot away from being a problem. Ayton slides in as the new C and as a EC is going to save them tons of $$$. Grant has a longer deal but his length, size and athleticism will be a nice change from the current forward situation. RWIII is a EC and due to injury has been devalued, he is mostly salary matching here but if he gets healthy he may have flip potential. They also reunite the twins and get a future FRP. (DDR is traded in a seperate deal)


TRADE 2

Portland Trades
Anfernee Simons G
Duop Reath C

Orlando Trades
Cole Anthony G
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope G
DEN FRP #24

WHY FOR PORTLAND
They are simply ready to move off Simons in this scenario as taking Zachs big deal means they are not paying Anfernee summer 2026. Here they take on 2 guys with deals a year longer than Simons but who fill some bench needs + get a late FRP.

WHY FOR ORLANDO
They have lacked a true bucket getting guard for years and bring the local kid home here while keeping all their blue chip prospects and the higher FRP. Reath has some value as a cheap floor spacer and allows them to explore trades for one of their more highly paid bigs (As they have a logjam)

2025/26 Roster
G - Scoot Henderson / Cole Anthony / Dalano Banton (VM)
G - Zach LaVine / Kentavious Caldwell-Pope / Nique Clifford (DEN FRP)
F - Toumani Camara / Matisse Thybulle / Rayan Rupert
F - Deni Avdija / Domantas Sabonis / Noa Essengue (PDX FRP) / Jabari Walker JR (VM)
C - Domantas Sabonis / Donovan Clingan / VM or BAE / Jabari Walker JR (VM)
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,030
And1: 240
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#2 » by longfellow44 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 3:55 pm

No this isn't enough value to get sabonis, we aren't interested in tying lavines contract into a trade like this just to lower his value.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,527
And1: 13,888
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#3 » by JRoy » Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:03 pm

A team with Sabonis and Lavine as its best players is a red carpet to nowhere.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,402
And1: 7,152
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#4 » by giberish » Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:14 pm

Looks VERY light for Sabonis. Sharpe isn't nearly enough and the rest is filler of about LaVine's value.

The 2nd trade looks possible or even marginally too good for Portland. Orlando certainly wouldn't need Reath but I assume he's there just as salary matching logistics.
DiegoChara
Junior
Posts: 466
And1: 532
Joined: Jun 09, 2023
       

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#5 » by DiegoChara » Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:35 pm

This certainly makes Portland a good team. I just don’t think it’s a path to contention in any meaningful way.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,905
And1: 12,050
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#6 » by LightTheBeam » Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:19 pm

Tough deal for sac. Lavine sucks and I'd love nothing more than seeing him traded, but doing that to get grants bad money makes this bad for sac.

There's a deal here between sac and Portland it shouldn't include lavine/grant, and needs another pick. But i love Sabonis with the young guns in Portland.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,369
And1: 3,058
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#7 » by BoogieTime » Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:27 pm

Where is the value the blazers are giving? I see none
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,775
And1: 10,432
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#8 » by Myth » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:20 pm

I like it for Portland. I still worry that trading Sharpe could be our version of trading Halliburton for Sabonis, but I think it does make the team better while retaining assets to make further improvements (which will still be needed). I was hesitant to have both Simons and LaVine, but then I read Trade 2 which I do believe balances the roster more. This trade seems to have us keeping the 2025 pick (surprisingly), so I’d suspect they would start looking for a replacement for either Grant’s contributions off the bench or a long term SG solution for when they eventually move on from LaVine.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,775
And1: 10,432
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#9 » by Myth » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:20 pm

BoogieTime wrote:Where is the value the blazers are giving? I see none

I get saying not enough, but Sharpe and a 1st is certainly not “none.”
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,030
And1: 240
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#10 » by longfellow44 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:22 pm

you are going to need to send Deni or Clingan or the kings hang up the phone. Trading Sabonis is not the same situation as trading fox, you can't just try to give us your scraps and think we will be happy about it.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,369
And1: 3,058
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#11 » by BoogieTime » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:25 pm

Myth wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:Where is the value the blazers are giving? I see none

I get saying not enough, but Sharpe and a 1st is certainly not “none.”


My apologies. Sharpe is still young and productive, true
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,527
And1: 13,888
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#12 » by JRoy » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:26 pm

longfellow44 wrote:you are going to need to send Deni or Clingan or the kings hang up the phone. Trading Sabonis is not the same situation as trading fox, you can't just try to give us your scraps and think we will be happy about it.


Please, hang up the phone.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,371
And1: 98,216
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#13 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:27 pm

I like the bold nature of this for Portland, but agree with everyone else, there just isn't much there for the Kings. Sharpe and a worst of pick 4 years from now is underwhelming and I'd rather have LaVine than Grant/Ayton so even that sucks out a bit of value.

I think I'd simplify this to Ayton/Clingan plus for Sabonis as the basis. Clingan makes the most sense as a value piece going out if you add Sabonis, then add value until you get there.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,354
And1: 8,421
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#14 » by Skybox » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:49 pm

I love #2, I’d welcome Reath to ORL because ORL has way too much $$$ invested in the AC spot and needs to shed someone and replace with a less expensive big body that can eat a few minutes. Obviously, a second deal sending out Goga or WCJ. Moe Wagner is not a suitable starter, but an excellent bench scorer. If not someone like Reath, there are some very interesting CJ’s late in this years draft and ORL has 4 picks.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,334
And1: 9,879
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#15 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:52 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:I like the bold nature of this for Portland, but agree with everyone else, there just isn't much there for the Kings. Sharpe and a worst of pick 4 years from now is underwhelming and I'd rather have LaVine than Grant/Ayton so even that sucks out a bit of value.

I think I'd simplify this to Ayton/Clingan plus for Sabonis as the basis. Clingan makes the most sense as a value piece going out if you add Sabonis, then add value until you get there.


The hope here would be to retain a number of + defenders to alleviate Sabonis on that end. I really cant see PDX giving up DC this quick.

Ayton + PDX FRP would be the offer in reality most likely.
The Graduate
Freshman
Posts: 76
And1: 73
Joined: May 10, 2008

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#16 » by The Graduate » Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:56 pm

Genuine question from a Blazers fan: can a Kings fan give me a bit more detail as to how you all have envisioned Sabonis functioning as second option (I'm assuming a first option is out of the question) on legitimately contending team? Does he need certain pieces around him? Can he play the 4 at all when it counts? Is it a total nonstarter?

I've liked watching Sabonis from the outside, but I will admit I am a touch skeptical as to how he can elevate a team during the playoffs. His positional shortcomings on defense make me question his effectiveness and give me slight David Lee vibes (I said, "slight," okay!). Setting aside what the Blazers would send in return, I get a bit nervous with him on $46.5 million per year deal.

Is this such an obvious upgrade that the Blazers should spend significant capital (probably locking themselves out of any bigger move) going in this direction in a move legitimately toward contention or is this signing on to being an 8th/9th seed for the foreseeable future?
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,030
And1: 240
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: PDX / SAC + PDX / ORL 

Post#17 » by longfellow44 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:50 pm

The Graduate wrote:Genuine question from a Blazers fan: can a Kings fan give me a bit more detail as to how you all have envisioned Sabonis functioning as second option (I'm assuming a first option is out of the question) on legitimately contending team? Does he need certain pieces around him? Can he play the 4 at all when it counts? Is it a total nonstarter?

I've liked watching Sabonis from the outside, but I will admit I am a touch skeptical as to how he can elevate a team during the playoffs. His positional shortcomings on defense make me question his effectiveness and give me slight David Lee vibes (I said, "slight," okay!). Setting aside what the Blazers would send in return, I get a bit nervous with him on $46.5 million per year deal.

Is this such an obvious upgrade that the Blazers should spend significant capital (probably locking themselves out of any bigger move) going in this direction in a move legitimately toward contention or is this signing on to being an 8th/9th seed for the foreseeable future?


Honestly sabonis is an easy player to build around. He needs a good defender next to him that is mobile and can block shots, he works best in the pick and roll so guys that move with or without the ball are helpful, consistent 3 points shooting is great for him as well.

The issue that the kings have had for 3 seasons now is that we haven't tried to add a long defender next to him and that we keep adding ball stoppers like DeRozan and lavine to a lesser extent.

Ideally the kings roster looks like this next year

Starting point guard that has range
Monk/Ellis
Keegan/ laravia
Long power forward
Sabonis/valanciunas

Kings trade DeRozan and lavine to get the needed pieces, even if they are less talented pieces than DeRozan and lavine. I get that it isn't realistic to move lavine with his contract but the kings could move DeRozan to try to plug some holes.

Return to Trades and Transactions