Cleveland/Sacremento
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Cleveland/Sacremento
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Okoro, and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Valenciunas, Ellis, and Murray
Cavs: Make some changes to the roster to get bigger and open up 21 million in space to sign Jerome, Merrill, and someone like a Malcolm Brogdon or do a follow up move to trade for a more established point guard. This trade gets cavs 14 million under the 2nd apron.
Sacramento: Get players that can elevate their team that are young and play alongside derozan and lavine. Kings will still be 1M under the luxury tax.
Sacramento: Sabonis, Valenciunas, Ellis, and Murray
Cavs: Make some changes to the roster to get bigger and open up 21 million in space to sign Jerome, Merrill, and someone like a Malcolm Brogdon or do a follow up move to trade for a more established point guard. This trade gets cavs 14 million under the 2nd apron.
Sacramento: Get players that can elevate their team that are young and play alongside derozan and lavine. Kings will still be 1M under the luxury tax.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
Ellis and Murray are the last two guys I want to move, especially if it's a move to try and win with Demar and Lavine.
This would also still leave us with no 4 and no depth behind Allen.
This would also still leave us with no 4 and no depth behind Allen.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,872
- And1: 12,008
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,740
- And1: 35,811
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
The Cavs aren't doing that.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,872
- And1: 12,008
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
jbk1234 wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
The Cavs aren't doing that.
Makes sense. Kings shouldn't do the OP. We should be moving away from a LaVine/Demar no defense core, not trading our two best defenders to go all in on a bunch of iso scorers.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Could make it a 3 teamer with Portland and move Monk and Strus as part of the trade to Portland for Grant.
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Strus, and Okoro
Cavs: Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, and Valenciunas
Portland: Grant
Portland: Monk and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Ellis, Murray, Valenciunas, and Monk
Sacremento: Garland, Allen, Grant, and Okoro
Allen
Grant
Derozan
Lavine
Garland
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,021
- And1: 235
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
Take Murray out of the op and add the Spurs 27 1st and I would do it. I wouldn't like it but I would do it.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,740
- And1: 35,811
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
bgrep14 wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Could make it a 3 teamer with Portland and move Monk and Strus as part of the trade to Portland for Grant.
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Strus, and Okoro
Cavs: Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, and Valenciunas
Portland: Grant
Portland: Monk and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Ellis, Murray, Valenciunas, and Monk
Sacremento: Garland, Allen, Grant, and Okoro
Allen
Grant
Derozan
Lavine
Garland
That's a gift to Portland at the Kings expense. Grant has negative trade value. None of these trades are legal. They're not particularly close either. Both the Kings and Blazers are well over the cap and the Cavs can't aggregate unless they're below the 2nd apron after the trade. The Cavs won't even know how much salary they need to save until there's a resolution on Merrill and Ty.
It's a fantasy board so enjoin, but the Cavs trading 3 starters and a role player, and cutting another two role players lose, from a 64 win team doesn't sound like the direction Altman is going in.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
jbk1234 wrote:bgrep14 wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Could make it a 3 teamer with Portland and move Monk and Strus as part of the trade to Portland for Grant.
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Strus, and Okoro
Cavs: Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, and Valenciunas
Portland: Grant
Portland: Monk and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Ellis, Murray, Valenciunas, and Monk
Sacremento: Garland, Allen, Grant, and Okoro
Allen
Grant
Derozan
Lavine
Garland
That's a gift to Portland at the Kings expense. Grant has negative trade value. None of these trades are legal. They're not particularly close either. Both the Kings and Blazers are well over the cap and the Cavs can't aggregate unless they're below the 2nd apron after the trade. The Cavs won't even know how much salary they need to save until there's a resolution on Merrill and Ty.
It's a fantasy board so enjoin, but the Cavs trading 3 starters and a role player, and cutting another two role players lose, from a 64 win team doesn't sound like the direction Altman is going in.
Says it's legal in the Fanspo trade machine. If there that far off in value then Portland can send Duop Reath to Kings or send Okoro instead of Monk.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,621
- And1: 3,161
- Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
I don't think CLE can do the OP trade over the 2nd apron. Is this getting them under it somehow?
It's also a LOT of change for a team that was pretty good last year. I tried to slim it down in a sensible way, but Sabonis is just a little too pricy for me to come up with something that i liked for CLE.
It's also a LOT of change for a team that was pretty good last year. I tried to slim it down in a sensible way, but Sabonis is just a little too pricy for me to come up with something that i liked for CLE.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,872
- And1: 12,008
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
bgrep14 wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Could make it a 3 teamer with Portland and move Monk and Strus as part of the trade to Portland for Grant.
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Strus, and Okoro
Cavs: Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, and Valenciunas
Portland: Grant
Portland: Monk and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Ellis, Murray, Valenciunas, and Monk
Sacremento: Garland, Allen, Grant, and Okoro
Allen
Grant
Derozan
Lavine
Garland
This is gross. The plan again should be to get away from LaVine/Demar not Keon/Murray.
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,832
- And1: 3,421
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Cleveland/Sacremento
LightTheBeam wrote:bgrep14 wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Assuming we can move Demar in a later trade -
Monk/Sabonis/Spurs 27 1st for Okoro/Allen/Garland
Cavs end up with
Sabonis/
Mobley/Wade
Hunter/Tyson
Strus/Monk
Mitchell/Jerome
If Kings can flip demar to Dallas for something like Naji, Martin then this is fine. Still suck, but I guess the defense would be okay.
Could make it a 3 teamer with Portland and move Monk and Strus as part of the trade to Portland for Grant.
Cavs: Garland, Allen, Strus, and Okoro
Cavs: Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, and Valenciunas
Portland: Grant
Portland: Monk and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Ellis, Murray, Valenciunas, and Monk
Sacremento: Garland, Allen, Grant, and Okoro
Allen
Grant
Derozan
Lavine
Garland
This is gross. The plan again should be to get away from LaVine/Demar not Keon/Murray.
Totally agree. If you’re moving Murray, Detroit would certainly be interested

But you shouldn’t. Bad enough that you ended up w Lavine already.
Return to Trades and Transactions