Blazers / Hawks
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Blazers / Hawks
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,053
- And1: 2,371
- Joined: Sep 26, 2003
- Contact:
-
Blazers / Hawks
Shaedon Sharpe for Dyson Daniels
Both were drafted in the same class, Sharpe at #7, Daniels at #8.
If both teams were open to a trade, what is needed to make it happen?
Sharpe is the more talented offensive player, Daniels the more talented defensive player. I'm sure everyone will debate that a bit, which leads to my question about what more is needed and by which team?
Both were drafted in the same class, Sharpe at #7, Daniels at #8.
If both teams were open to a trade, what is needed to make it happen?
Sharpe is the more talented offensive player, Daniels the more talented defensive player. I'm sure everyone will debate that a bit, which leads to my question about what more is needed and by which team?
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,819
- And1: 13,772
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
hawks prefer daniels next to trae.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,755
- And1: 10,416
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Dyson Daniels is worth more.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,497
- And1: 13,851
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
No reason for ATL to consider this but good grief that would boost POR d.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Junior
- Posts: 466
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 09, 2023
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Daniels is worth more but I personally wouldn’t want Portland to pay more to make that swap.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,818
- And1: 2,336
- Joined: Dec 03, 2012
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Daniels should have more value than Shaedon.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,053
- And1: 2,371
- Joined: Sep 26, 2003
- Contact:
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Dame Lizard wrote:Daniels should have more value than Shaedon.
How much more though IF they two teams were to make a trade.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 11,767
- And1: 8,071
- Joined: Dec 13, 2013
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
This feels like both teams get a worse fit. I’m not really sure I’m seeing the vision. Dyson is a fantastic compliment next to Trae due to his defense and Trae’s gravity making up for his offensive shortcomings.
Dyson and Scoot would be a very tough pairing offensively.
Dyson and Scoot would be a very tough pairing offensively.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,755
- And1: 10,416
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Mamba4Goat wrote:This feels like both teams get a worse fit. I’m not really sure I’m seeing the vision. Dyson is a fantastic compliment next to Trae due to his defense and Trae’s gravity making up for his offensive shortcomings.
Dyson and Scoot would be a very tough pairing offensively.
Sharpe is already a bad shooter. Dyson would at least compensate defensively. I’d take his fit next you Scoot over Sharpe’s.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,329
- And1: 98,143
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
I think the Blazers should be calling about a Hawks guard, but the one named Trae.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,755
- And1: 10,416
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Texas Chuck wrote:I think the Blazers should be calling about a Hawks guard, but the one named Trae.
We’ll take both!
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,083
- And1: 4,339
- Joined: Jul 29, 2001
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Myth wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I think the Blazers should be calling about a Hawks guard, but the one named Trae.
We’ll take both!
Ha, yeah, I have said elsewhere that I am not convinced pushing a lot of chips in for Trae alone improves the Blazers enough to justify his price, but simply swapping these two backcourts in a fantasy land where that could happen would be such a fit, let alone talent, upgrade for Portland. However, it's not worth dreaming about -- Atlanta probably doesn't move Daniels and would be aiming higher in a Trae return.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,755
- And1: 10,416
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Tim Lehrbach wrote:Myth wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I think the Blazers should be calling about a Hawks guard, but the one named Trae.
We’ll take both!
Ha, yeah, I have said elsewhere that I am not convinced pushing a lot of chips in for Trae alone improves the Blazers enough to justify his price, but simply swapping these two backcourts in a fantasy land where that could happen would be such a fit, let alone talent, upgrade for Portland. However, it's not worth dreaming about -- Atlanta probably doesn't move Daniels and would be aiming higher in a Trae return.
Yeah, what we would have to give up for them is a very different question. I think many fans have underrated Trae for years, seemingly due to limited team success, but his surrounding team has never been very impressive. I think the Hawks organization however still values him plenty and would demand a lot in return. Dyson would also require a lot in return.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,303
- And1: 9,850
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Blazers / Hawks
I think Daniels has more value than Sharpe - but I also think the skillset Sharpe brings as a scorer is what PDX needs more than another defender. I would rather stick with Sharpe and hope he develops than swap him, and likely add draft compensation, for Daniels.
As for Tre, no idea what the cost would be but I would do Scoot, Sharpe, 11 and a future FRP. I think the defenders PDX has are pretty ideal for a Young led team.
As for Tre, no idea what the cost would be but I would do Scoot, Sharpe, 11 and a future FRP. I think the defenders PDX has are pretty ideal for a Young led team.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,349
- And1: 8,413
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
JRoy wrote:No reason for ATL to consider this but good grief that would boost POR d.
so would KCP and he's sitting there waiting for you. Daniels is superior to KCP, but he's also an expiring and will likely get paid more than KCP's $21.6 x 2 yrs...and Daniels can't shoot 3's or even FTs at an average %.
KCP, Jett Howard & #25 for Simons
Both teams get better...plus a legit frp this summer. Stop fighting the obvious JRoy

Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,497
- And1: 13,851
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
No.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,755
- And1: 10,416
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Skybox wrote:JRoy wrote:No reason for ATL to consider this but good grief that would boost POR d.
so would KCP and he's sitting there waiting for you. Daniels is superior to KCP, but he's also an expiring and will likely get paid more than KCP's $21.6 x 2 yrs...and Daniels can't shoot 3's or even FTs at an average %.
KCP, Jett Howard & #25 for Simons
Both teams get better...plus a legit frp this summer. Stop fighting the obvious JRoy
Make it #16 or find something to bridge the gap if it is #25 and I’m in.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- Forum Mod - Blazers
- Posts: 14,600
- And1: 6,592
- Joined: Mar 11, 2010
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Is Portland really ready the jump back on the small no defense PG train? I cannot see that being a viable route forward, especially because Trae would likely cost us our lottery pick and our future Boston/Milwaukee picks, plus some young players and any expirings we have leaving us with no further options to improve. It would be treadmill City all over again, we would be a first round out almost every year.
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,349
- And1: 8,413
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Blazers / Hawks
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:Is Portland really ready the jump back on the small no defense PG train? I cannot see that being a viable route forward, especially because Trae would likely cost us our lottery pick and our future Boston/Milwaukee picks, plus some young players and any expirings we have leaving us with no further options to improve. It would be treadmill City all over again, we would be a first round out almost every year.
No...trade your small PG (Scoot) for a really big PG who plays elite D (Anthony Black)...ORL adds 2026 frp (which has a huge upside swap with PHX)
Re: Blazers / Hawks
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,303
- And1: 9,850
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Blazers / Hawks
Skybox wrote:JRoy wrote:No reason for ATL to consider this but good grief that would boost POR d.
so would KCP and he's sitting there waiting for you. Daniels is superior to KCP, but he's also an expiring and will likely get paid more than KCP's $21.6 x 2 yrs...and Daniels can't shoot 3's or even FTs at an average %.
KCP, Jett Howard & #25 for Simons
Both teams get better...plus a legit frp this summer. Stop fighting the obvious JRoy
PDX would need 16 rather than 25 to take on the extra year of KCP IMO.
Return to Trades and Transactions