Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
Trade 1
Cavs: Okoro
Utah: TPE
Trade 2
Cavs: Garland, Wade, and Strus
Cavs: Brown, Jones, and Davis
Sacramento: Garland and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Jones, and Davis
Boston: Brown
Boston: Sabonis
Trade 1: Cavs get under 2nd apron to complete 2nd trade. Utah gets a young piece to add to their rebuild.
Trade 2: Boston gets an all star big and is 11 million from getting under 2nd apron which would mean trading Hauser to Detroit for a TPE, Cleveland gets under 2nd apron which gives them the space to sign Jerome, and Sacremento gets a younger 2x allstar point guard to build around.
Cavs: Okoro
Utah: TPE
Trade 2
Cavs: Garland, Wade, and Strus
Cavs: Brown, Jones, and Davis
Sacramento: Garland and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Jones, and Davis
Boston: Brown
Boston: Sabonis
Trade 1: Cavs get under 2nd apron to complete 2nd trade. Utah gets a young piece to add to their rebuild.
Trade 2: Boston gets an all star big and is 11 million from getting under 2nd apron which would mean trading Hauser to Detroit for a TPE, Cleveland gets under 2nd apron which gives them the space to sign Jerome, and Sacremento gets a younger 2x allstar point guard to build around.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,822
- And1: 13,774
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
you are not under 2nd apron/didnt count roster holds
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
ReggiesKnicks wrote:Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
I think Brown gives them the physicality they need from the wing to defend athletic teams. I think Garland and Mitchell are just to undersized to compete.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,964
- And1: 3,292
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
ReggiesKnicks wrote:Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
What 2nds?
I love this for CLE, it's just what they need.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,827
- And1: 9,247
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
You forgot to list SAC in the title.
Cavs right now are $5.1M over the 2nd apron with 11 players signed. Factoring in filling out the roster and they're probably like $10M over. This deal swaps $66.3M in Garland/Okoro/Strus for $54.1M in Brown but also creates two more open roster spots. The math there is REALLY tight. CLE would have to get creative to fill the team out. It's probably doable, but very, very hard and likely requires a shallow roster. It's be Mitchell/Brown/Hunter/Mobley/Allen as starters (awesome!) but then Wade and all vet min and multiple ROOKIE minimums on the bench. That's not sustainable to keep staying in the 2nd apron and being that shallow with all of those guys long term either.
It's a creative idea but I just can't see the payroll math working.
Cavs right now are $5.1M over the 2nd apron with 11 players signed. Factoring in filling out the roster and they're probably like $10M over. This deal swaps $66.3M in Garland/Okoro/Strus for $54.1M in Brown but also creates two more open roster spots. The math there is REALLY tight. CLE would have to get creative to fill the team out. It's probably doable, but very, very hard and likely requires a shallow roster. It's be Mitchell/Brown/Hunter/Mobley/Allen as starters (awesome!) but then Wade and all vet min and multiple ROOKIE minimums on the bench. That's not sustainable to keep staying in the 2nd apron and being that shallow with all of those guys long term either.
It's a creative idea but I just can't see the payroll math working.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
SkyHook wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
What 2nds?
I love this for CLE, it's just what they need.
The 2 2nds OP had in the trade

Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
bgrep14 wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
I think Brown gives them the physicality they need from the wing to defend athletic teams. I think Garland and Mitchell are just to undersized to compete.
Right but that fixes one area while opening up an even bigger one, unless you expect Mobley to be able to be Bam Adebayo offensively and be a pillar of their offense.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,956
- And1: 12,731
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
I think you need to check math on the Apron.
After the trade the Cavs have 6 vacant roster spots. 8 players. I don’t think there is room to sign Jerome and stay under the 2nd Apron, where Cleveland is now hardcapped.
Sac becomes hard capped at the 1st Apron.
After the trade the Cavs have 6 vacant roster spots. 8 players. I don’t think there is room to sign Jerome and stay under the 2nd Apron, where Cleveland is now hardcapped.
Sac becomes hard capped at the 1st Apron.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,822
- And1: 13,774
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
hugepatsfan wrote:You forgot to list SAC in the title.
Cavs right now are $5.1M over the 2nd apron with 11 players signed. Factoring in filling out the roster and they're probably like $10M over. This deal swaps $66.3M in Garland/Okoro/Strus for $54.1M in Brown but also creates two more open roster spots. The math there is REALLY tight. CLE would have to get creative to fill the team out. It's probably doable, but very, very hard and likely requires a shallow roster. It's be Mitchell/Brown/Hunter/Mobley/Allen as starters (awesome!) but then Wade and all vet min and multiple ROOKIE minimums on the bench. That's not sustainable to keep staying in the 2nd apron and being that shallow with all of those guys long term either.
It's a creative idea but I just can't see the payroll math working.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/CLE.html
with 11 players signed they are 11M over, not 5 after mobley's DPOY bonus
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,964
- And1: 3,292
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
ReggiesKnicks wrote:SkyHook wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:Trade 1: Okoro isn't worth 2 2nds
Trade 2: I hate this for Cleveland. Brown doesn't fix their issues and we saw their offense become disjointed without a floor general.
What 2nds?
I love this for CLE, it's just what they need.
The 2 2nds OP had in the trade
There are no SRPs in the trade, there were none when I responded. Maybe he deleted them within six minutes after he posted and before I saw it, but how is that not a legitimate question?
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,740
- And1: 35,812
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
I wouldn't do this. You're trading two starters and a rotation wing for a really good player who just isn't worth 35% of the cap. I don't think we can retain either Jerome or Merrill after this. After you bump Hunter up to replace Strus, you have Wade and that's it on the bench.
More than that, I'm not at all sure that a Brown/Mitchell backcourt works or what that means for Mobley's development.
More than that, I'm not at all sure that a Brown/Mitchell backcourt works or what that means for Mobley's development.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,740
- And1: 35,812
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
Duplicate
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,827
- And1: 9,247
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
Godaddycurse wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:You forgot to list SAC in the title.
Cavs right now are $5.1M over the 2nd apron with 11 players signed. Factoring in filling out the roster and they're probably like $10M over. This deal swaps $66.3M in Garland/Okoro/Strus for $54.1M in Brown but also creates two more open roster spots. The math there is REALLY tight. CLE would have to get creative to fill the team out. It's probably doable, but very, very hard and likely requires a shallow roster. It's be Mitchell/Brown/Hunter/Mobley/Allen as starters (awesome!) but then Wade and all vet min and multiple ROOKIE minimums on the bench. That's not sustainable to keep staying in the 2nd apron and being that shallow with all of those guys long term either.
It's a creative idea but I just can't see the payroll math working.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/CLE.html
with 11 players signed they are 11M over, not 5 after mobley's DPOY bonus
Ah, spotrac hasn't adjusted for the Mobley DPOY bonus yet. Still have him at 25%. Tough break for CLE there (not necessarily because they can't do this deal, just in general).
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,956
- And1: 12,731
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
bgrep14 wrote:brackdan70 wrote:I think you need to check math on the Apron.
After the trade the Cavs have 6 vacant roster spots. 8 players. I don’t think there is room to sign Jerome and stay under the 2nd Apron, where Cleveland is now hardcapped.
Sac becomes hard capped at the 1st Apron.
Fanspo said they'd be 9.7 million under second apron with 9 roster spots. They could move which they'd use to sign Jerome. Then they'd still have to fill two roster spots after. My guess is they'd probably need to move Wade for another TPE then sign 3 minimum vets to fill out the roster if they want to stay under 2nd apron. Might need to include Dean Wade to Sacremento with Davis and Jones going to Cleveland.
I think Sport Trac is more accurate.
Assuming you guarantee Porter you have 9 guys and about 7 million under the 2nd apron after the trade. You need 14 rostered players minimum.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Celtics 2 part trade
SkyHook wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:SkyHook wrote:
What 2nds?
I love this for CLE, it's just what they need.
The 2 2nds OP had in the trade
There are no SRPs in the trade, there were none when I responded. Maybe he deleted them within six minutes after he posted and before I saw it, but how is that not a legitimate question?
OP edited it. They had 2 2nds in the Utah section.
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,956
- And1: 12,731
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
Aside the 2nd Apron challenges. I am nervous about this from the Boston side. Yea it saves a bunch of Money and Sabonis is a great player…maybe higher trade value than Brown given the contracts, but Brown is a proven playoff performer and great fit in Boston. My guess is they don’t look to move him but IDK.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 4,438
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: May 27, 2017
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
bgrep14 wrote:Trade 1
Cavs: Okoro
Utah: TPE
Trade 2
Cavs: Garland, Wade, and Strus
Cavs: Brown, Jones, and Davis
Sacramento: Garland and Strus
Sacramento: Sabonis, Jones, and Davis
Boston: Brown
Boston: Sabonis
Trade 1: Cavs get under 2nd apron to complete 2nd trade. Utah gets a young piece to add to their rebuild.
Trade 2: Boston gets an all star big and is 11 million from getting under 2nd apron which would mean trading Hauser to Detroit for a TPE, Cleveland gets under 2nd apron which gives them the space to sign Jerome, and Sacremento gets a younger 2x allstar point guard to build around.
Why not just send Hauser into the Sac TPE?
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,872
- And1: 12,009
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Boston/Utah/Sacremento 2 part trade
if boston accepts that deal, SacrAmento just cuts out ClevAland out and takes Brown for themselves.
How hard is it to spell Sacramento btw op? lol
How hard is it to spell Sacramento btw op? lol
Return to Trades and Transactions