House Stark and House Baratheon
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
House Stark and House Baratheon
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,344
- And1: 43,401
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
House Stark and House Baratheon
Wolves get Lillard
Bucks get Randle, Conley, DDV, Minott
Wolves take a run at Lillard while his value is down. Lillard may be out for the season but he'll be back eventually and he fits the Wolves needs.
Bucks try to build with depth around Giannis.
Bucks get Randle, Conley, DDV, Minott
Wolves take a run at Lillard while his value is down. Lillard may be out for the season but he'll be back eventually and he fits the Wolves needs.
Bucks try to build with depth around Giannis.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Randle is more valuable than Lillard, weird trade.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 20,271
- And1: 30,483
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Being honest, I think that this trade would be closer to being reconcilable in the hypothetical world where Damian Lillard doesn't get injured.
It's hard to see Minnesota eating that much salary over two years for a (soon to be) thirty-five year old Point Guard who tore his Achilles' tendon a month ago, especially at the cost of three of their top eight rotational players.
It's hard to see Minnesota eating that much salary over two years for a (soon to be) thirty-five year old Point Guard who tore his Achilles' tendon a month ago, especially at the cost of three of their top eight rotational players.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,344
- And1: 43,401
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Domejandro wrote:Being honest, I think that this trade would be closer to being reconcilable in the hypothetical world where Damian Lillard doesn't get injured.
It's hard to see Minnesota eating that much salary over two years for a (soon to be) thirty-five year old Point Guard who tore his Achilles' tendon a month ago, especially at the cost of three of their top eight rotational players.
Well I'm not sure if Conley has much left, I do think Randle and DDV have reasonable value though and obviously were just part of the KAT trade.
If Lillard injury didn't happen then I think Minny owe a little more value, but I can also see that OP trade is not fair value and Vicks owe more currently.
Would an FRP balance it?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,958
- And1: 3,278
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
zimpy27 wrote:Domejandro wrote:Being honest, I think that this trade would be closer to being reconcilable in the hypothetical world where Damian Lillard doesn't get injured.
It's hard to see Minnesota eating that much salary over two years for a (soon to be) thirty-five year old Point Guard who tore his Achilles' tendon a month ago, especially at the cost of three of their top eight rotational players.
Well I'm not sure if Conley has much left, I do think Randle and DDV have reasonable value though and obviously were just part of the KAT trade.
If Lillard injury didn't happen then I think Minny owe a little more value, but I can also see that OP trade is not fair value and Vicks owe more currently.
Would an FRP balance it?
I don't think that the trade is salvageable with one or even multiple picks. It's asking a conference finals team to gut their roster for a player who likely won't suit up at all next year and has little chance of being anywhere near the same player again. In my opinion, it's similar to suggesting the Lakers trade Reaves and Rui for Dejounte Murray, but only in a hypothetical scenario where LA hadn't flamed out in the first round.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,276
- And1: 19,284
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
I liked the title!
I agree that MIN won’t take a season off after two trips to the WCF. But there is another reason - Tim Connelly doesn’t take seasons off.
When Connelly came to MIN, one of his first moves was the giant Rudy Gobert trade. One of the major complaints about the trade (besides value), was that this was a trade based on Towns’ timeline, when we should make moves based on Ant (and to a lesser extent, Jaden and Naz). Connelly disagreed, and said part of the reason that you do a trade like this is to get Ant into competitive games early in his career. He believes that to properly develop a young star, he needs to experience winning, in the regular season and the playoffs, and the earlier he gets it, the higher his trajectory.
Many Wolves fans disagrees. They had been used to GMs and coaches that embraced tanking to try to find that lottery talent. And with this strategy, MIN had been spinning its wheels for nearly twenty years. Always avoiding tanking may not be the typical, or even correct, GM strategy, but I don’t think a Connelly team will take a step back.
I agree that MIN won’t take a season off after two trips to the WCF. But there is another reason - Tim Connelly doesn’t take seasons off.
When Connelly came to MIN, one of his first moves was the giant Rudy Gobert trade. One of the major complaints about the trade (besides value), was that this was a trade based on Towns’ timeline, when we should make moves based on Ant (and to a lesser extent, Jaden and Naz). Connelly disagreed, and said part of the reason that you do a trade like this is to get Ant into competitive games early in his career. He believes that to properly develop a young star, he needs to experience winning, in the regular season and the playoffs, and the earlier he gets it, the higher his trajectory.
Many Wolves fans disagrees. They had been used to GMs and coaches that embraced tanking to try to find that lottery talent. And with this strategy, MIN had been spinning its wheels for nearly twenty years. Always avoiding tanking may not be the typical, or even correct, GM strategy, but I don’t think a Connelly team will take a step back.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,344
- And1: 43,401
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
shrink wrote:I liked the title!
I agree that MIN won’t take a season off after two trips to the WCF. But there is another reason - Tim Connelly doesn’t take seasons off.
When Connelly came to MIN, one of his first moves was the giant Rudy Gobert trade. One of the major complaints about the trade (besides value), was that this was a trade based on Towns, when the timeline should be based on Ant (and to a lesser extent, Jaden and Naz). Connelly disagrees, and said part of the reason that you do a trade like this is to get Ant into competitive games early in his career. He believes that to properly develop a young star, he needs experience winning, in the regular season and the playoffs, and the earlier he gets it, the higher his trajectory.
Many Wolves fans disagrees. They had been used to GMs and coaches that embraced tanking to try to find that lottery talent. And with this strategy, MIN had been spinning its wheels for nearly twenty years. It may not be the typical, or even correct, GM move to avoid tanking seasons, but I don’t think a Connelly team will take a step back.
Minny are still a playoff team with the team though.
Dilly, Ant, McD, Naz, Gobert -- #17, Clark, TSJ, Miller, Garza
That's not including FAs you add in offseason.
You get to give Dilly reps and McD get a bigger role to step up in to
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,725
- And1: 35,788
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
I can't imagine any team trading for Dame without serious incentive being attached.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,095
- And1: 1,433
- Joined: Jan 15, 2015
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Theres no way Wolves trade their starting PF and a sixth man for an injured Lillard.
If Lillard didnt get injured in the first place still would look weird, but workable, but a Achilles injury? at his age? with how he had performed before the injury? Bucks will need to eat terrible money to trade Dame
If Lillard didnt get injured in the first place still would look weird, but workable, but a Achilles injury? at his age? with how he had performed before the injury? Bucks will need to eat terrible money to trade Dame
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,825
- And1: 5,894
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
This seems like a last season GOT script when the really jump the shark. IMO this would have to include more incentive than Milw has to add to pull this off. This might have be a fair offer if Dame hadn't torn his Achilles.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,164
- And1: 10,830
- Joined: Jan 28, 2020
- Contact:
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Wait. A team coming off back to back WCF's trades one of their best players, and other depth for a guy who won't even play next year. Does OP not know Lillard is injured? What am I missing here?
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,890
- And1: 1,232
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Does Lillard come with a time machine? Is Nico Harrison taking over the TWolves? Otherwise very hard to make sense of this trade.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,004
- And1: 2,095
- Joined: Jan 03, 2012
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
If anyone could come back from this injury i think Lillard could but even Kobe was a shell of himself after, and trading away these players to take a year off is weird. If anything i think Dilly should start next season, i think he has all star scoring potential.

Instagram: @casetwelve
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,958
- And1: 3,278
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
Case2012 wrote:If anyone could come back from this injury i think Lillard could but even Kobe was a shell of himself after, and trading away these players to take a year off is weird. If anything i think Dilly should start next season, i think he has all star scoring potential.
Lillard and Kobe were the same age at the time of their injury, both just shy of 35. Dominique was the oldest player, at 32, to look even remotely like his former self following a blown Achilles. Recovery from one is a mixed bag at best.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,491
- And1: 13,846
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
zimpy27 wrote:Wolves get Lillard
Bucks get Randle, Conley, DDV, Minott
Wolves take a run at Lillard while his value is down. Lillard may be out for the season but he'll be back eventually and he fits the Wolves needs.
Bucks try to build with depth around Giannis.
Love it because my team is not involved.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,958
- And1: 3,278
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
JRoy wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Wolves get Lillard
Bucks get Randle, Conley, DDV, Minott
Wolves take a run at Lillard while his value is down. Lillard may be out for the season but he'll be back eventually and he fits the Wolves needs.
Bucks try to build with depth around Giannis.
Love it because my team is not involved.
We need more threads about Dame returning home.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,491
- And1: 13,846
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: House Stark and House Baratheon
SkyHook wrote:JRoy wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Wolves get Lillard
Bucks get Randle, Conley, DDV, Minott
Wolves take a run at Lillard while his value is down. Lillard may be out for the season but he'll be back eventually and he fits the Wolves needs.
Bucks try to build with depth around Giannis.
Love it because my team is not involved.
We need more threads about Dame returning home.
Boo this man.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Return to Trades and Transactions