BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
- rambo_ortega
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,510
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jan 22, 2004
BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Celtics Get:
Nikola Vucevic
Caleb Martin
Buddy Hield
They lose key players and lower their salary but still get quality rotation players
Pritchard/White/Brown/Tatum/Vucevic
Bulls Get:
Jonathan Kuminga (25m S&T)
Daniel Gafford
They gamble on Kuminga and lose the salary of Vuc
Giddey/White/Buzelis/Kuminga/Gafford
Mavericks Get:
Jrue Holiday
They get a PG who can play alongside Kyrie once healthy
Kyrie/Jrue/Flagg/AD/Lively
Pistons Get:
Naji Marshall
Pistons accommodate this trade to get a cheap but very productive player who is perfect for them
Cade/Ivey/Thompson/Harris/Duren
Warriors Get:
Kristaps Porzingis
Dubs get their perfect starting Center instead of losing Kuminga for nothing
Curry/Podz/Butler/Green/Porzi
Nikola Vucevic
Caleb Martin
Buddy Hield
They lose key players and lower their salary but still get quality rotation players
Pritchard/White/Brown/Tatum/Vucevic
Bulls Get:
Jonathan Kuminga (25m S&T)
Daniel Gafford
They gamble on Kuminga and lose the salary of Vuc
Giddey/White/Buzelis/Kuminga/Gafford
Mavericks Get:
Jrue Holiday
They get a PG who can play alongside Kyrie once healthy
Kyrie/Jrue/Flagg/AD/Lively
Pistons Get:
Naji Marshall
Pistons accommodate this trade to get a cheap but very productive player who is perfect for them
Cade/Ivey/Thompson/Harris/Duren
Warriors Get:
Kristaps Porzingis
Dubs get their perfect starting Center instead of losing Kuminga for nothing
Curry/Podz/Butler/Green/Porzi

Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,846
- And1: 8,224
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
I know DET is the most minor part, but I like it for them
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,987
- And1: 20,151
- Joined: Jul 24, 2010
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Bulls seem to be making our very well here. Gafford and Kuminga for Vuc?
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
- GreekAlex
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,195
- And1: 1,813
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
oldncreaky wrote:I know DET is the most minor part, but I like it for them
How does it work for Detroit if we’re resigning our FA’s and operating over the cap?
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,821
- And1: 5,894
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
GreekAlex wrote:oldncreaky wrote:I know DET is the most minor part, but I like it for them
How does it work for Detroit if we’re resigning our FA’s and operating over the cap?
Use MLE as a TPE?
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 551
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
GreekAlex wrote:oldncreaky wrote:I know DET is the most minor part, but I like it for them
How does it work for Detroit if we’re resigning our FA’s and operating over the cap?
There is no need for Naji in Detroit. We have Holland Thompson at the three. Maybe a 2025 first with him to get value.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,955
- And1: 2,357
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
First I don't see how the Bulls take in $39M and send out $21M. I might not play the S&T game that well.
There's caution from the Bulls. Gafford is an expiring contract, what the Bulls are going to have to see is can they get enough shooters on the floor with him, and right now I'd say No. The 2026 summer questions will be with Collins and Gafford expiring have they given Jalen Smith enough work so that he can play a bigger role in his contract year or does he feel he's been wasted, walk in and ask for a trade.Who do they keep and for how much?
They are betting a lot on Kuminga, the money and does he really bring the talent and put it to good use. They don't need him filling the stat sheet, they need him to join the team that finished last seas, moving the ball, letting Giddey and White control things and he needs to see Buzelis as the face of the franchise, Don't hold him back!
Yes Vuc needs to move on but I don't think this is the best way
There's caution from the Bulls. Gafford is an expiring contract, what the Bulls are going to have to see is can they get enough shooters on the floor with him, and right now I'd say No. The 2026 summer questions will be with Collins and Gafford expiring have they given Jalen Smith enough work so that he can play a bigger role in his contract year or does he feel he's been wasted, walk in and ask for a trade.Who do they keep and for how much?
They are betting a lot on Kuminga, the money and does he really bring the talent and put it to good use. They don't need him filling the stat sheet, they need him to join the team that finished last seas, moving the ball, letting Giddey and White control things and he needs to see Buzelis as the face of the franchise, Don't hold him back!
Yes Vuc needs to move on but I don't think this is the best way
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,758
- And1: 10,433
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
djFan71 wrote:Bulls seem to be making our very well here. Gafford and Kuminga for Vuc?
Yeah the Bulls accept and don't let the other teams think too hard about it.

I assume at least a first rounder would have to be outgoing somewhere.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,363
- And1: 7,116
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
I don't think GS could build a credible roster under the 1st apron with KP's salary (and the need for depth given overall age and KP's health and this deal caps the Warriors at the 1st apron.
The value looks very good for Chicago except I think they're overpaying Kuminga by $5-10M/yr.
The value looks very good for Chicago except I think they're overpaying Kuminga by $5-10M/yr.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,194
- And1: 3,321
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
The pistons will operate as an over the cap team and won’t have space to do this.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,720
- And1: 7,842
- Joined: Jun 18, 2018
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
giberish wrote:I don't think GS could build a credible roster under the 1st apron with KP's salary (and the need for depth given overall age and KP's health and this deal caps the Warriors at the 1st apron.
Yeah, that's the problem. The Warriors can probably live capped at the second apron, but not the first.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Junior
- Posts: 295
- And1: 118
- Joined: Feb 11, 2024
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
ChettheJet wrote:First I don't see how the Bulls take in $39M and send out $21M. I might not play the S&T game that well.
There's caution from the Bulls. Gafford is an expiring contract, what the Bulls are going to have to see is can they get enough shooters on the floor with him, and right now I'd say No. The 2026 summer questions will be with Collins and Gafford expiring have they given Jalen Smith enough work so that he can play a bigger role in his contract year or does he feel he's been wasted, walk in and ask for a trade.Who do they keep and for how much?
They are betting a lot on Kuminga, the money and does he really bring the talent and put it to good use. They don't need him filling the stat sheet, they need him to join the team that finished last seas, moving the ball, letting Giddey and White control things and he needs to see Buzelis as the face of the franchise, Don't hold him back!
Yes Vuc needs to move on but I don't think this is the best way
Use the TPE to take in Gafford. Obviously the rest of the trade doesn’t work for GSW with cap restraints and hard capped. Plus they can’t that much back. All sorts of wrong
Fan Logic - Doesn’t shot 3’s = No good
It’s Giddey NOT Giddy
With the 12th pick Chicago Bulls Select: NOA ESSENGUE
It’s Giddey NOT Giddy
With the 12th pick Chicago Bulls Select: NOA ESSENGUE
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,074
- And1: 912
- Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Dallas passes. Jrue is not a PG. Jrue is regressing and paying til 40 and is on ugly contract. Gafford is in career year and is leader in blocks and attitude on the team. Marshall is not a random throw-in. Boston needs to pay more. The Mavs is definitely more interested in White who is a PG and in his prime.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,074
- And1: 912
- Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
If Dallas trades for Jrue, it's more likely with Klay, Martin and Hardy as returning piece. At least, this give Dallas reason to pull the trigger.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,361
- And1: 440
- Joined: Jan 22, 2020
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
DetroitDon15 wrote:GreekAlex wrote:oldncreaky wrote:I know DET is the most minor part, but I like it for them
How does it work for Detroit if we’re resigning our FA’s and operating over the cap?
There is no need for Naji in Detroit. We have Holland Thompson at the three. Maybe a 2025 first with him to get value.
Naji has outplayed his contract, and a positive asset right now. No way DET is stealing value in this trade, without giving up anything.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,846
- And1: 8,224
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Michaellam1987 wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:GreekAlex wrote:
How does it work for Detroit if we’re resigning our FA’s and operating over the cap?
There is no need for Naji in Detroit. We have Holland Thompson at the three. Maybe a 2025 first with him to get value.
Naji has outplayed his contract, and a positive asset right now. No way DET is stealing value in this trade, without giving up anything.
Looks like we are giving up space (or a TPE) -- that is not nothing. Marshall is a decent player, and I'd agree he's positive. He can defend 4s better than any 3 on our roster not named Ausar. Naji Marshall also has questionable shooting, and looks to me like a career backup.
If Naji could shoot better, maybe DET would pony up a SRP or 2, but as is, trading into space/TPE is probably closer to fair value for Naji.
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,226
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Naji is a bad fit for Detroit and he should return a 2nd if taken to cap space, not exactly a deal breaker...
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,361
- And1: 440
- Joined: Jan 22, 2020
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
oldncreaky wrote:Michaellam1987 wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:
There is no need for Naji in Detroit. We have Holland Thompson at the three. Maybe a 2025 first with him to get value.
Naji has outplayed his contract, and a positive asset right now. No way DET is stealing value in this trade, without giving up anything.
Looks like we are giving up space (or a TPE) -- that is not nothing. Marshall is a decent player, and I'd agree he's positive. He can defend 4s better than any 3 on our roster not named Ausar. Naji Marshall also has questionable shooting, and looks to me like a career backup.
If Naji could shoot better, maybe DET would pony up a SRP or 2, but as is, trading into space/TPE is probably closer to fair value for Naji.
If it is only TPE for Naji, I am sure there will be 10+ teams being interested and to give up something more than that
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,284
- And1: 98,052
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Billl wrote:The pistons will operate as an over the cap team and won’t have space to do this.
Remember that under this CBA, you can use the MLE as a trade exception, so they could do this if they wanted and should still have have plenty of room under the tax with any reasonable contracts given to Dennis/Beasley.
Not saying they should use their exception for this, just that its possible.

ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,846
- And1: 8,224
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: BOS-CHI-DAL-DET-GSW Trade
Michaellam1987 wrote:oldncreaky wrote:Michaellam1987 wrote:
Naji has outplayed his contract, and a positive asset right now. No way DET is stealing value in this trade, without giving up anything.
Looks like we are giving up space (or a TPE) -- that is not nothing. Marshall is a decent player, and I'd agree he's positive. He can defend 4s better than any 3 on our roster not named Ausar. Naji Marshall also has questionable shooting, and looks to me like a career backup.
If Naji could shoot better, maybe DET would pony up a SRP or 2, but as is, trading into space/TPE is probably closer to fair value for Naji.
If it is only TPE for Naji, I am sure there will be 10+ teams being interested and to give up something more than that
More power to you if you can, but I see him as JAG
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Return to Trades and Transactions