Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,283
And1: 98,051
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#1 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:02 pm

for their own 26 1st back.

So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,283
And1: 98,051
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:02 pm

Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,370
And1: 5,983
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#3 » by gswhoops » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:02 pm

Seems reasonable (and blows up a trade proposal I was literally just typing out in another tab)
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,370
And1: 5,983
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#4 » by gswhoops » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:06 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?

Idk, but there are a lot of guys who make sense for them projected to go in that range. Would love to see them get Jakucionis at 7 and then a big SG who can hit from deep like Clifford, Riley, or McNeeley at 23.
nolaPELSfan
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 87
Joined: May 14, 2013

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#5 » by nolaPELSfan » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:06 pm

Could be trying to move up. I like the 20s in the draft though and wanted another 1st. Win win either way to me.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,524
And1: 1,237
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#6 » by tester551 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:10 pm

Fair value.
I like it for both teams
Chinook
Head Coach
Posts: 6,644
And1: 3,772
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
       

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#7 » by Chinook » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:11 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:for their own 26 1st back.

So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.


Yeah, that Chuck guy sure does muck up the board with his takes sometimes. At least he's not as bad as that Chinook fellow.

But I wouldn't say this is a sign of anything. The Pacers are very unlikely to be doing this to tank, which is what motivates a lot of the "get their picks back" discourse. Brooklyn remains pretty unique in that regard.

The question is if Indy did this because they want as many unprotected firsts as possible for an upcoming all-in trade, or if it was just the best deal they could get for a pick they didn't want to use.
hsfolk
Junior
Posts: 428
And1: 321
Joined: Dec 11, 2011

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#8 » by hsfolk » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:12 pm

is Mojave King just a throw in player? I couldn't find anything about him other than what's listed on his wikipedia page
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,890
And1: 1,232
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#9 » by wemby » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:13 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?

They probably like that range I assume. If this was about making another move, I'm not sure pick 23 holds more value than the Pacers 26 first.
balsamic_ducks
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 412
Joined: Aug 02, 2022
 

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#10 » by balsamic_ducks » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:14 pm

I like it for both teams. With the east being so weak next year, it's unlikely this pick is better than 23 in 2026 so makes sense to cash it in now as the pels. It also helps the pacers tax situation and unlocks all their future 1sts for them to trade
nolaPELSfan
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 87
Joined: May 14, 2013

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#11 » by nolaPELSfan » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:15 pm

We have to be pretty sure that the Pacers pick next year will be worse than #23, and even barring a worse case scenario like a Hali injury, it was top 4 protected anyway. I think this years is more valuable for sure.
balsamic_ducks
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 412
Joined: Aug 02, 2022
 

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#12 » by balsamic_ducks » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:16 pm

hsfolk wrote:is Mojave King just a throw in player? I couldn't find anything about him other than what's listed on his wikipedia page


He sounds like a made up player from NBA2K that you have to battle against in mycareer.
esvl
Starter
Posts: 2,208
And1: 629
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#13 » by esvl » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:19 pm

Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move
balsamic_ducks
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 412
Joined: Aug 02, 2022
 

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#14 » by balsamic_ducks » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:20 pm

esvl wrote:Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move


Top 4
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,370
And1: 5,983
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#15 » by gswhoops » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:25 pm

nolaPELSfan wrote:Could be trying to move up. I like the 20s in the draft though and wanted another 1st. Win win either way to me.

More assets is aways helpful, but both Utah (#5) and Washington (#6) have multiple 1st round picks already. Not sure they would want to move down for more picks this year (vs. deferring a year for a higher-variance asset in the IND pick). I feel like they'd be better situated to trade up with the IND pick.

My guess is there's someone they like who they think will be around at #23 and they haven't gotten any traction on a trade-up.
hoopsfan777
Junior
Posts: 253
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 01, 2025
         

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#16 » by hoopsfan777 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:25 pm

I like it. I want us to take two of the following.

Kasparas Jakucionas
Khaman Maluach
Noa Essengue
Egor Denim
Ben Saraf
Maxine Raynaud
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,358
And1: 7,113
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#17 » by giberish » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:30 pm

Surprising that it happened now, as opposed to closer or during the draft.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,857
And1: 11,694
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#18 » by eminence » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:31 pm

Have the Pacers winning this one on value. Worst case it's a slightly worse pick next year. Decent chance it's a similar pick. Some chance it's a much better pick. And I prefer the draft next season as of now, though obviously a college season can change it up dramatically.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,937
And1: 3,264
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#19 » by SkyHook » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:34 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:for their own 26 1st back.

So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.


I like it for both. What I'm surprised at is a team making any kind of deal while they're playing in the finals. Just seems surreal.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#20 » by ReggiesKnicks » Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:44 pm

I like this a lot for us. Gives us more breathing room under the Tax as will, as little as it provides it may be meaningful.

Return to Trades and Transactions