Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,283
- And1: 98,051
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
for their own 26 1st back.
So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.
So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,283
- And1: 98,051
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,370
- And1: 5,983
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Seems reasonable (and blows up a trade proposal I was literally just typing out in another tab)
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,370
- And1: 5,983
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Texas Chuck wrote:Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?
Idk, but there are a lot of guys who make sense for them projected to go in that range. Would love to see them get Jakucionis at 7 and then a big SG who can hit from deep like Clifford, Riley, or McNeeley at 23.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 313
- And1: 87
- Joined: May 14, 2013
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Could be trying to move up. I like the 20s in the draft though and wanted another 1st. Win win either way to me.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,524
- And1: 1,237
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Fair value.
I like it for both teams
I like it for both teams
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,644
- And1: 3,772
- Joined: Jan 12, 2015
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Texas Chuck wrote:for their own 26 1st back.
So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.
Yeah, that Chuck guy sure does muck up the board with his takes sometimes. At least he's not as bad as that Chinook fellow.
But I wouldn't say this is a sign of anything. The Pacers are very unlikely to be doing this to tank, which is what motivates a lot of the "get their picks back" discourse. Brooklyn remains pretty unique in that regard.
The question is if Indy did this because they want as many unprotected firsts as possible for an upcoming all-in trade, or if it was just the best deal they could get for a pick they didn't want to use.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 428
- And1: 321
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
is Mojave King just a throw in player? I couldn't find anything about him other than what's listed on his wikipedia page
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,890
- And1: 1,232
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Texas Chuck wrote:Confused why the Pels are doing this now. Do they need this pick for another move, or do they just like this draft overall?
They probably like that range I assume. If this was about making another move, I'm not sure pick 23 holds more value than the Pacers 26 first.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 412
- Joined: Aug 02, 2022
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
I like it for both teams. With the east being so weak next year, it's unlikely this pick is better than 23 in 2026 so makes sense to cash it in now as the pels. It also helps the pacers tax situation and unlocks all their future 1sts for them to trade
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 313
- And1: 87
- Joined: May 14, 2013
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
We have to be pretty sure that the Pacers pick next year will be worse than #23, and even barring a worse case scenario like a Hali injury, it was top 4 protected anyway. I think this years is more valuable for sure.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 412
- Joined: Aug 02, 2022
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
hsfolk wrote:is Mojave King just a throw in player? I couldn't find anything about him other than what's listed on his wikipedia page
He sounds like a made up player from NBA2K that you have to battle against in mycareer.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 629
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 412
- Joined: Aug 02, 2022
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
esvl wrote:Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move
Top 4
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,370
- And1: 5,983
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
nolaPELSfan wrote:Could be trying to move up. I like the 20s in the draft though and wanted another 1st. Win win either way to me.
More assets is aways helpful, but both Utah (#5) and Washington (#6) have multiple 1st round picks already. Not sure they would want to move down for more picks this year (vs. deferring a year for a higher-variance asset in the IND pick). I feel like they'd be better situated to trade up with the IND pick.
My guess is there's someone they like who they think will be around at #23 and they haven't gotten any traction on a trade-up.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Junior
- Posts: 253
- And1: 58
- Joined: Jun 01, 2025
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
I like it. I want us to take two of the following.
Kasparas Jakucionas
Khaman Maluach
Noa Essengue
Egor Denim
Ben Saraf
Maxine Raynaud
Kasparas Jakucionas
Khaman Maluach
Noa Essengue
Egor Denim
Ben Saraf
Maxine Raynaud
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,358
- And1: 7,113
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Surprising that it happened now, as opposed to closer or during the draft.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,857
- And1: 11,694
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Have the Pacers winning this one on value. Worst case it's a slightly worse pick next year. Decent chance it's a similar pick. Some chance it's a much better pick. And I prefer the draft next season as of now, though obviously a college season can change it up dramatically.
I bought a boat.
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,937
- And1: 3,264
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
Texas Chuck wrote:for their own 26 1st back.
So Chuck has to retire his trope about teams not trading for their own picks back....Here is another team doing it.
I like it for both. What I'm surprised at is a team making any kind of deal while they're playing in the finals. Just seems surreal.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans
I like this a lot for us. Gives us more breathing room under the Tax as will, as little as it provides it may be meaningful.
Return to Trades and Transactions