Brooklyn - Portland - Sacramento

[Godaddycurse]

Brooklyn trade: Johnson, 36
Brooklyn receive: Grant, 11

Portland trade: Grant, 11
Portland receive: DeRozan, 36, SAS 2027 1st

Sacramento trade: Derozan, SAS 2027 1st
Sacramento receive: Johnson

Why for Brooklyn: take on bad salary for a lotto pick (rumor they offered green/10 for cam/19, grant is worse than green so made it 36 instead)
Why for Portland: Add a vet mentor for sharpe/scoot, save bunch of money and roll over their pick
Why for Sacramento: roster balance

[JRoy]

POR is not giving up a lotto pick to move Grant. POR needs a shot at high end talent from the draft more than salary relief, late picks and DDR.

[Blazinaway]

agree with Jroy, no chance POR does this

[Mavrelous]

Right now SAS have one good player whose archetype has shaky health history, assigning low value to that pick is very premature.
I have this deal as too god for POR, I don't see much gap between 11 and SAS 27, but massive gap between DDR and Grant.

[Myth]

Absolutely not for Portland.

[Myth]

Right now SAS have one good player whose archetype has shaky health history,

I think Castle, Fox, Harper, and a collection of 1sts that they are rumored to want to package for a win now player gives them more than just one good player for when we are talking about a draft a couple years away.

[Netaman]

not bad for nets, but not sure they'd do it depending on what else is out there for CJ. it is possible he can bring back a pick in the 9-15 range somehow without having to take on 3 years $100m. you mentioned the HOU offer, there was also a similar TOR rumor for #9, SAS and OKC have each been rumored to like CJ, PHI has been rumored for him too so that's a possible trade up involving him etc.

If PHO gets back a pick for KD, it seems within reason that they could be interested in sending out their negative salary (allen, o'neale) and that pick to bring back CJ and/or reunite Claxton with Ott.

CJ and Bane had almost identical seasons last year and CJ is cheaper, I don't expect him to bring back the volume of picks Bane did obviously but his fit is so easy across so many contenders I think there is a better chance than not that he will be able to help the nets get another lotto pick.

[LightTheBeam]

Cut Brooklyn out

[OGSactownballer]

I can’t see giving up ANY picks for a non all star caliber player. It’s simply spinning your wheels.

[longfellow44]

Rather than give up a first I would probably target Michael porter jr instead of cam Johnson. Porter produces the same stats and defense and won't cost a first.