Page 1 of 4
Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:15 pm
by MoneyTalks41890
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:16 pm
by Godaddycurse
This is.... questionable by Dumars
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:16 pm
by daoneandonly
Great for Wiz, putrid for New Orleans. WHy did they hire DUmars?
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:16 pm
by ReggiesKnicks
All of these trades (Minus KD to Houston, which this board was spot-on about) include players we thought would or could be moved, but the combinations were missed. Incredible off-season so far.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:19 pm
by gswhoops
I've been banging the drum that this board overrates how much it "costs" to move bad contracts for years now, so I'm just gonna pat myself on the back a little bit here.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:20 pm
by TPA
A lateral trade on it's face. One less year of big salary for the Wiz swapping CJ in for Poole.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:21 pm
by Domejandro
Honestly, it's alright for both. Personally, I wouldn't take on Jordan Poole's extra year, but it's not completely putrid. I think it's a clear win for Washington, but I understand why New Orleans would give it a shot.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:21 pm
by Kineto
Washington is collecting all the expiring veteran of the league (smart, middleton, mc collum), next one porzingis ?
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:22 pm
by gswhoops
Neither #23 for a future pick or this are huge moves by themselves, but they both appear to be trying to get better now rather than accumulating future assets. Wonder if NO is trying to make moves up the Western Conference food chain.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:22 pm
by Astaluego
CJ+Olynyc+SRP for Poole+Bey
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:22 pm
by ReggiesKnicks
Poole was much better this year, 20/4.5/3 on +34.0 TS+. Being able to put him off-ball more should increase his efficiency even more, so next to Trey/Zion. He has a salary for this coming year and the following season.
Poole is an upgrade to C.J. at this point, how much? Let's find out.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:23 pm
by LaSheed
Lol Weaver & Dumars strike again.
As a Pistons fan....Pelicans it's just getting started
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:23 pm
by babyjax13
Paying Poole and Dejounte seems like a great choice.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:24 pm
by Malapropism
Pelicans save ~7M in this deal this year, but take on an extra year of Poole and Bey.
This was a great deal for Washington.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:24 pm
by JRoy
Well done WAS
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:31 pm
by Xman
[quote="Malapropism"]Pelicans save ~7M in this deal this year, but take on an extra year of Poole and Bey.
This was a great deal for Washington.[/quote]
Clear cap in 2026/27 except for Kispert and team options.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:34 pm
by Mavrelous
Not sure what direction Pelicans are aiming for...
I like it for the Wizards, they shouldn't have traded for Poole in the 1st place.
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:35 pm
by jayjaysee
Feels like a nice dump for Washington rather than risking Poole revert again.
New Orleans is a confusing spot. But doesn’t seem horrible. Though I did suggest Poole to Dallas and get yelled at. A lot.
But maybe Dallas can get CJM easier now?
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:36 pm
by Mavrelous
?t=HD_CguwTNUesxUKnhYIVPA&s=19
Re: Shams: CJ to WAS, Poole to NOP
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:40 pm
by gswhoops
babyjax13 wrote:Paying Poole and Dejounte seems like a great choice.
Of all the choices they could have made, this is certainly one of them.