BOS MIL CHI CHA DET

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
enzino
Veteran
Posts: 2,616
And1: 148
Joined: Apr 24, 2004
Location: ITALIA

BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#1 » by enzino » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:24 pm

combination of two separate trades:

BOS OUT: A. Simons, P. Pritchard, S. Hauser
BOS IN: J. Ivey, D. Robinson, 18 M USD CAP RELIEF
Fix the Apron issue, add a valuable young player

MIL OUT: K. Kuzma, MIL '26 FRP (TOP10 PROTECTED)
MIL IN: A. Simons
find replacement for Dame, free cap space for next year FAcy

CHI OUT: P. Williams, CHI '26 FRP (TOP15 PROTECTED)
CHI IN: K. Kuzma
get rid of PW, add more scoring ability

CHA OUT: G. Williams
CHA IN: P. Williams, CHI '26 FRP (TOP15 PROTECTED)
eat more salary but receives a compensation in terms of draft capital

DET OUT: J. Ivey, D. Robinson
DET IN: G. Williams, P. Pritchard, S. Hauser, MIL '26 FRP (TOP10 PROTECTED)
get a true PG, a cheaper shooter than D.Robinson (17 M$ VS 10 M$ of Hauser), draft compensation for extra money received in incoming salary

Image
Image
Image
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,997
And1: 2,373
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#2 » by ChettheJet » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:41 pm

Is Kuzma going to be the 3 or the 4? Because Buzelis is going to be the 4 and I seriously doubt the Bulls want Kuzma taking shots from him for 2 years and then time from Essengue in year two. That's ignoring that they sure don't want to give even a potential pick to do it while giving up their best front court defensive player. Just leave the Bulls out of this
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,275
And1: 9,771
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#3 » by tmorgan » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:49 pm

Bulls are getting hosed the worst here. Even with getting off PWill for a 1st, they’re forced to take Kuz for free.

As for Detroit, I don’t think moving Ivey for parts (and taking on Grant Williams) is the plan. I see the reasoning, but I don’t think it happens.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 16,990
And1: 15,730
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#4 » by BK_2020 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:05 pm

So much about this scenario is wrong but let's start with Payton Pritchard being a true point guard.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,865
And1: 9,316
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#5 » by hugepatsfan » Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:27 pm

CHI overpaying to shed PWillians but take on Kuzma. Their long term cap sheet is too clean to pay this to save future money. And while PWilliams has a pretty inconspicuous game, Kuzma plays the kind of style that takes away from other players. If the cost was some 2nds I think CHI should do it, but no where near this price.

Is MIL able to trade that pick? If so, I guess it's fair if they project it to be in the 20s, which seems fair since I believe it'd be worst of them and Atlanta. Simons fits better than Kuzma and they save a good chunk of money next year.

Seems like good value for CHA and on first glance feels fine for their cap sheet.

For DET, I kind of like it. I think DRob for Hauser would be an upgrade and cost savings. I'm not a big Ivey guy so him for Pritchard/pick even with GWilliams coming back seems like a clear win for me. If they still value Ivey as an ascending player with top 5 draft pedigree though then I think they scoff at this. Pritchard definitely isn't a "true PG" though, not that they should care since that archetype is the most overrated position on forums like this. Fans love that archetype of "true PG" but unless that player is actually a true scorer too it's terrible for your offense to give anyone the ball enough to be a "true PG".

For BOS, I don't like the value because I'm not an Ivey guy, but this does get them within duck the tax range so that value needs to be factored in. I just hope they don't go this direction, not that it would even be available to them IMO because DET will overvalue Ivey.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,514
And1: 13,042
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#6 » by zeebneeb » Tue Jul 15, 2025 7:39 pm

I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 13,036
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#7 » by brackdan70 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:02 pm

tmorgan wrote:Bulls are getting hosed the worst here. Even with getting off PWill for a 1st, they’re forced to take Kuz for free.

As for Detroit, I don’t think moving Ivey for parts (and taking on Grant Williams) is the plan. I see the reasoning, but I don’t think it happens.

Agree on Bulls. They turn Williams into Kuzma at the cost of a FRP. I think you pull that pick out and have Bucks send a second to Charlotte.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,527
And1: 1,230
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#8 » by Warspite » Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:13 pm

zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


It looks absurd now.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,869
And1: 3,460
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#9 » by theBigLip » Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:19 pm

zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


You said it Zeeb. The rest of the league forgot about Ivey after he broke his leg. He’ll be back 100% and make this trade look silly.

Also, Pistons had a chance already to pick up Hauser for nothing. They chose Robinson instead. There’s a reason for that - Robinson is a better player.

Lastly, Pistons already have a true PG :D
Patsfan1081
RealGM
Posts: 12,233
And1: 5,735
Joined: Jan 06, 2015

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#10 » by Patsfan1081 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:24 pm

theBigLip wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


You said it Zeeb. The rest of the league forgot about Ivey after he broke his leg. He’ll be back 100% and make this trade look silly.

Also, Pistons had a chance already to pick up Hauser for nothing. They chose Robinson instead. There’s a reason for that - Robinson is a better player.

Lastly, Pistons already have a true PG :D


What are you talking about “Hauser for nothing?” When could they have done that? Robinson also isn’t a better player, there isn’t a single metric that supports that. The rest of the league also didn’t forget, they remember the first two years in the league more so than a thirty game sample.
Patsfan1081
RealGM
Posts: 12,233
And1: 5,735
Joined: Jan 06, 2015

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#11 » by Patsfan1081 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:43 pm

zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


Spare parts is a odd way to describe someone coming off a sixth man of the year award. Even if healthy and continued the same play Ivey wouldn’t have come close to sniffing the eight and a half plus win share that Pritchard posted last season. Ivey has done nothing so far in the league to warrant that hype. Besides the fact he coming back from a broken leg in a contract year.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,472
And1: 14,206
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#12 » by HornetJail » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:44 pm

pass on being stuck with a second more expensive Josh Green on 3x the contract
investigate Adam Silver
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,869
And1: 3,460
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#13 » by theBigLip » Wed Jul 16, 2025 1:58 am

Patsfan1081 wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


Spare parts is a odd way to describe someone coming off a sixth man of the year award. Even if healthy and continued the same play Ivey wouldn’t have come close to sniffing the eight and a half plus win share that Pritchard posted last season. Ivey has done nothing so far in the league to warrant that hype. Besides the fact he coming back from a broken leg in a contract year.


Ivey will be coming back just fine. Broken leg is a simple injury, not an ACL or achilles. Just keep pritchard. And make sure to bring up this thread during the season so we can see who was right :D
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,035
And1: 4,161
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#14 » by daoneandonly » Wed Jul 16, 2025 11:22 am

Boston is not giving up anything, warranting getting Ivey and dumping SImons.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,326
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#15 » by Kalamazoo317 » Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:00 pm

I think gambling on Ivey's upside makes more sense for Detroit than selling him off like this.
DetroitDon15
General Manager
Posts: 8,836
And1: 553
Joined: Jul 23, 2002
         

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#16 » by DetroitDon15 » Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:08 pm

Kalamazoo317 wrote:I think gambling on Ivey's upside makes more sense for Detroit than selling him off like this.


I think the current value of Ivey is higher than what the Pistons are receiving. If the Pistons move Ivey, it’s in a trade up for a player of greater impact. This deal doesn’t do it. Trading Ivey for lesser parts, no real value able draft compensation and taking on bad salary makes zero sense.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 13,036
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#17 » by brackdan70 » Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:31 pm

DetroitDon15 wrote:
Kalamazoo317 wrote:I think gambling on Ivey's upside makes more sense for Detroit than selling him off like this.


I think the current value of Ivey is higher than what the Pistons are receiving. If the Pistons move Ivey, it’s in a trade up for a player of greater impact. This deal doesn’t do it. Trading Ivey for lesser parts, no real value able draft compensation and taking on bad salary makes zero sense.

Pritchard and a pick is not enough value for Ivey?
That’s insane thinking to me.
How is Ivey any better than Pritchard?
He is 4 years younger than her so there is that upside that is worth some value, but the pick more than makes up for that imo.
I get that you might want to include Ivey and picks for a player of higher impact, but this is great value for Ivey. You could turn this package around for a player of higher impact.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,314
And1: 17,173
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#18 » by JayMKE » Wed Jul 16, 2025 3:23 pm

Bucks get the worst pick out of a swap between New Orleans and Atlanta, likely that's still in the 20s. Not really interested in attaching a pick to Kuzma to dump him tho, Bucks need an athletic wing player way more than a small guard that likes to shoot. Bucks at the 1 signed Kevin Porter Jr, Ryan Rollins, and Cole Anthony this offseason. At the 2 there is AJ Green and Gary Trent Jr and a lot of people want undersized Trent to play more 3.
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,143
And1: 14,996
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#19 » by 165bows » Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:19 pm

Warspite wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:I'll just say this; Respectfully, this trade will look absurd by December.

Ivey is by far and away the best player listed, and he's combined with Duncan, for spare parts. Also for Grant Williams. Good grief.


It looks absurd now.

Agreed, why is Boston trading good players for Ivey when they already have the 4 year older version in Simons?
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,869
And1: 3,460
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: BOS MIL CHI CHA DET 

Post#20 » by theBigLip » Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:26 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
DetroitDon15 wrote:
Kalamazoo317 wrote:I think gambling on Ivey's upside makes more sense for Detroit than selling him off like this.


I think the current value of Ivey is higher than what the Pistons are receiving. If the Pistons move Ivey, it’s in a trade up for a player of greater impact. This deal doesn’t do it. Trading Ivey for lesser parts, no real value able draft compensation and taking on bad salary makes zero sense.

Pritchard and a pick is not enough value for Ivey?
That’s insane thinking to me.
How is Ivey any better than Pritchard?
He is 4 years younger than her so there is that upside that is worth some value, but the pick more than makes up for that imo.
I get that you might want to include Ivey and picks for a player of higher impact, but this is great value for Ivey. You could turn this package around for a player of higher impact.


Ivey is one of the best athletes in the league. He had a wasted year w a historically bad coach, followed up w 30 great games and then the broken leg. This year will be his coming out party. His ceiling is so much higher than Pritchard’s.

Return to Trades and Transactions