Avdija to MEM 2.0 [updated to 3.0]
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Avdija to MEM 2.0 [updated to 3.0]
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,227
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Avdija to MEM 2.0 [updated to 3.0]
On January 15, 2026:
Avdija
Grant
for
Aldama (can be re-routed to 3d team for FRP and expiring)
GG Jacskon and/or Pippen (can be re-routed to 3d teams for FRP)
KCP
Konchar
1st 2026 via MEM
1st 2030 via MEM
Portland leverages Memphis’ obsession with Avdija by getting 2 4 unprotected 1sts , a 7’0 24 y/o PF whose skillset matches Clingan, a 20 y/o established SF, two servicable veterans, and geting rid off Grant’s contract.
Memphis gets a starting wing who can pass, score, and most importantly defend.
Thoughts?
Avdija
Grant
for
Aldama (can be re-routed to 3d team for FRP and expiring)
GG Jacskon and/or Pippen (can be re-routed to 3d teams for FRP)
KCP
Konchar
1st 2026 via MEM
1st 2030 via MEM
Portland leverages Memphis’ obsession with Avdija by getting 2 4 unprotected 1sts , a 7’0 24 y/o PF whose skillset matches Clingan, a 20 y/o established SF, two servicable veterans, and geting rid off Grant’s contract.
Memphis gets a starting wing who can pass, score, and most importantly defend.
Thoughts?
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,989
- And1: 15,728
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Memphis 2016 FRP was Wade Baldwin so no, Portland respectfully declines.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,227
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
BK_2020 wrote:Memphis 2016 FRP was Wade Baldwin so no, Portland respectfully declines.
Fixed. Thanks.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,608
- And1: 13,970
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Talent downgrade for non lotto picks. Pass for POR.
Would rather send Grant in a separate deal to avoiding diluting Denis value if the decision were made to move him.
Would rather send Grant in a separate deal to avoiding diluting Denis value if the decision were made to move him.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,143
- And1: 17,648
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
I think Portland feels like it can push for the playoffs because of Deni. Offer is really reasonable, I just do not see them taking it.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,330
- And1: 1,522
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
babyjax13 wrote:I think Portland feels like it can push for the playoffs because of Deni. Offer is really reasonable, I just do not see them taking it.
Is it though? I don't think this is particularly close, particularly because of that contract. This is about what the Blazers paid for Deni, and I don't think they would want to take back that deal.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,865
- And1: 9,315
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Many question why POR acquired Jrue Holiday and then made a pretty heavy offer to Dame considering his injury. Doing those things and then turning around and trading Avidja for picks after that would only make it more questionable. This just seems misaligned with the direction they're moving in.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,865
- And1: 9,315
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Malapropism wrote:babyjax13 wrote:I think Portland feels like it can push for the playoffs because of Deni. Offer is really reasonable, I just do not see them taking it.
Is it though? I don't think this is particularly close, particularly because of that contract. This is about what the Blazers paid for Deni, and I don't think they would want to take back that deal.
It's reasonable in the sense that I don't think Deni really did anything to elevate his standing last year. His year in POR was, largely, like his year in WAS. And one of those cheap contract years is off. So if POR were to trade him, I think about what they paid to get him is reasonable approximation of what value they could expect to receive. I get your point though - why would POR trade him for anything other than a massive offer far above what they paid, since they like him? From that standpoint I guess, them trading him for this isn't "reasonable".
But I think when most people say if an offer is reasonable not they go with the viewpoint of "if the team were willing to trade this player for fair market value, is this an offer that has a chance to be the best offer", From that standpoint, I do think this is a reasonable offer.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,239
- And1: 4,015
- Joined: Aug 13, 2011
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Portland adding Jrue (and now Dame) puts an end to any Deni trade discussions for this year, at least this year
esvl wrote:On January 15, 2026:
Avdija
Grant
for
Aldama
GG Jacskon
KCP
Konchar
1st 2026 via MEM
1st 2030 via MEM
Portland leverages Memphis’ obsession with Avdija by getting 2 unprotected 1sts, a 7’0 24 y/o PF whose skillset matches Clingan, a 20 y/o established SF, two servicable veterans, and geting rid off Grant’s contract.
Memphis gets a starting wing who can pass, score, and most importantly defend.
Thoughts?
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,330
- And1: 1,522
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
hugepatsfan wrote:Malapropism wrote:babyjax13 wrote:I think Portland feels like it can push for the playoffs because of Deni. Offer is really reasonable, I just do not see them taking it.
Is it though? I don't think this is particularly close, particularly because of that contract. This is about what the Blazers paid for Deni, and I don't think they would want to take back that deal.
It's reasonable in the sense that I don't think Deni really did anything to elevate his standing last year. His year in POR was, largely, like his year in WAS. And one of those cheap contract years is off. So if POR were to trade him, I think about what they paid to get him is reasonable approximation of what value they could expect to receive. I get your point though - why would POR trade him for anything other than a massive offer far above what they paid, since they like him? From that standpoint I guess, them trading him for this isn't "reasonable".
But I think when most people say if an offer is reasonable not they go with the viewpoint of "if the team were willing to trade this player for fair market value, is this an offer that has a chance to be the best offer", From that standpoint, I do think this is a reasonable offer.
I think he was meaningfully better than his year in Washington, but I follow the Blazers so we can chalk that up to bias. Also, it's one less less on that amazing contract so we can be be safe and call it a wash.
But the point is that contract is still 3 years and well below market rate and we've seen the true ramifications of the salary cap start to hit teams this year. I think, even IF the Blazers were willing to put Avdija on the market, that contract would make him uniquely attractive to a number of teams given his plus starter status, the position he plays, and his relative age. Even if the Grizzlies offer was fair in a vacuum, I think they'd simply be outbid unless the Blazers somehow love GG Jackson for some unknown reason. The Grizzlies would really have to bowl the Blazers over with an overpay-ish offer (think, Desmond Bane, ironically), to make them even consider it.
Also, I can already see the comments about them also dumping Grant in the same deal but ironically, I think if the Blazers do decide to move off of Avdija it would actually make it more likely that they'd want to keep Grant - particularly with the more recent moves, but I digress.
Either way, I don't think this is reasonable in the sense that Portland couldn't get more, or that Portland would consider it even if they could not get more based on their situation (which you and I agree with), so it's completely DOA, IMO.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,947
- And1: 12,076
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
This is really interesting. On first thought If I'm Portland I want to hold onto Advija. Getting to dump Grant in the process is nice, but eating KCP/Konchar deals offsets two years of that for worse players.
I think this comes down to thoughts on GG. If you think GG can build off his 1st year, then this feels great for Portland. GG/Camara/Aldama is a good start at the forward spots. Those extra picks allow them to make a big move in the future with Scoot.
I think this comes down to thoughts on GG. If you think GG can build off his 1st year, then this feels great for Portland. GG/Camara/Aldama is a good start at the forward spots. Those extra picks allow them to make a big move in the future with Scoot.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
- MasterIchiro
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,388
- And1: 6,845
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
- Location: The Dirty Water
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
If I'm Portland I appreciate and understand the calls on Deni but I'm not listening. He fits the modern NBA, and the Blazers pivoted out of their rebuild.
It has been written...
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
- JasonStern
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,191
- And1: 4,265
- Joined: Dec 13, 2008
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
There is a negative % chance that Deni or Camara (and now Dame) get moved from the Blazers. And Ha 2.0 for Chinese marketing reasons.
But trading Grant for three day old grocery store sushi is certainly something the Blazers should consider if available.
The need to dump Grant got significantly less important when the Blazers made the Jrue trade. Having Grant off the books, then simply letting Ayton and Simons expire provided a ton of financial flexibility. But they opted out of that path for reasons never explained.
But trading Grant for three day old grocery store sushi is certainly something the Blazers should consider if available.
The need to dump Grant got significantly less important when the Blazers made the Jrue trade. Having Grant off the books, then simply letting Ayton and Simons expire provided a ton of financial flexibility. But they opted out of that path for reasons never explained.
I don't have a cool avatar image because Dame came home.
"Hate all you want. The Bucks will trade Doc Rivers for me."
- Chauncey Billups
"Hate all you want. The Bucks will trade Doc Rivers for me."
- Chauncey Billups
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,908
- And1: 35,991
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
hugepatsfan wrote:Malapropism wrote:babyjax13 wrote:I think Portland feels like it can push for the playoffs because of Deni. Offer is really reasonable, I just do not see them taking it.
Is it though? I don't think this is particularly close, particularly because of that contract. This is about what the Blazers paid for Deni, and I don't think they would want to take back that deal.
It's reasonable in the sense that I don't think Deni really did anything to elevate his standing last year. His year in POR was, largely, like his year in WAS. And one of those cheap contract years is off. So if POR were to trade him, I think about what they paid to get him is reasonable approximation of what value they could expect to receive. I get your point though - why would POR trade him for anything other than a massive offer far above what they paid, since they like him? From that standpoint I guess, them trading him for this isn't "reasonable".
But I think when most people say if an offer is reasonable not they go with the viewpoint of "if the team were willing to trade this player for fair market value, is this an offer that has a chance to be the best offer", From that standpoint, I do think this is a reasonable offer.
He bumped his TS% up to 60% while having the highest FGAs and ppg of his career. Also, there was a lot more getting his own shot than in years past.
That was the 2nd year in a row he's shown real development on that front, he's on an uber cheap deal for two more seasons, and he's 24. He's the best the young player on Portland's roster by a significant margin. This isn't a situation where debate about the lower end of player's market value is all that relevant. He's not getting moved for that.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
- BarbaGrizz
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,610
- And1: 1,753
- Joined: May 25, 2007
- Location: Brazil
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
The only asset I would not include in a Avidja trade is JJJ. Everything else is on the table for me.
Celtic Koala wrote:The only player from the 90s that would have been a top 10 player in the modern league would have been MJ and if you stretch it a bit Olajuwon
bstein14 wrote:Mikan is much worse than Luka Garza, who can't even make an NBA roster today
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,014
- And1: 598
- Joined: May 22, 2018
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
BarbaGrizz wrote:The only asset I would not include in a Avidja trade is JJJ. Everything else is on the table for me.
Great player, most his value is in his versatility and contract. If Deni is your best player you aren’t winning too much but also not losing too much creating treadmill. Similar to Lauri.
Most I would offer would be Konchar/GG/4 1st. Not a bad deal by the OP as well.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,228
- And1: 10,946
- Joined: Jan 28, 2020
- Contact:
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
In a vacuum, this trade doesn't look bad. But Avdija is EASILY the best player in this deal. Portland just added Holiday and Lillard, they aren't going to turn around and subtract talent for middling draft picks.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,242
- And1: 3,967
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
This is pretty bad for Portland. Grant is about neutral value, so adding him really doesn't really make the trade closer. The picks don't have much upside.
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,434
- And1: 10,017
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
If Memphis thinks Avdija is the missing piece (similar to Bane to Orlando) I think you gladly overpay (which you’re going to have to do regardless because Deni is not available).
The question now lies if Deni is truly the missing piece…
Even though I personally think Deni is nearing over rated conversations, I still think the original proposal is not nearly enough for Portland to consider (who is clearly looking to compete sooner than later).
The question now lies if Deni is truly the missing piece…
Even though I personally think Deni is nearing over rated conversations, I still think the original proposal is not nearly enough for Portland to consider (who is clearly looking to compete sooner than later).
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,014
- And1: 598
- Joined: May 22, 2018
-
Re: Avdija to MEM 2.0
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:If Memphis thinks Avdija is the missing piece (similar to Bane to Orlando) I think you gladly overpay (which you’re going to have to do regardless because Deni is not available).
The question now lies if Deni is truly the missing piece…
Even though I personally think Deni is nearing over rated conversations, I still think the original proposal is not nearly enough for Portland to consider (who is clearly looking to compete sooner than later).
Prior to the Bane trade, Deni was a player I viewed as the final piece and wanted us to trade for last season. I spent weeks debating Wizards fans about his value and availability; but now with the reshaping of the Grizz roster I would prefer to go a different route. Young athletic wings and 3&D wings make the most sense for what we are looking to become.
Return to Trades and Transactions