KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,775
- And1: 9,687
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
-
KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
I'm playing around with a general framework, but throwing this out there:
Kings receive: Castle, Kuminga, Hield
Spurs receive: Monk, Keegan Murray, '27 1st returned
Warriors receive: Harrison Barnes, Devin Carter
The Kings get the Kuminga move done and bring in a big, do everything lead guard to complement LaVine. Buddy returns to town (not sure if this a good thing or not, but this team could certainly use some shooting). Don't love how all the pieces fit together, particularly from a shooting perspective, but there's at least some interesting pieces in place.
The Warriors bring Barnes back into the fold, filling a hole for them as a 3/D 4 man, while taking a flier on Carter as a 2nd year guard that could potentially be a nice piece for them.
The Spurs bring improve their long-term fit/shooting profile, bringing in Murray as a 3+D forward. Monk reunites with Fox, filling a 6th man scoring role for them.
Flame away, I would.
Kings receive: Castle, Kuminga, Hield
Spurs receive: Monk, Keegan Murray, '27 1st returned
Warriors receive: Harrison Barnes, Devin Carter
The Kings get the Kuminga move done and bring in a big, do everything lead guard to complement LaVine. Buddy returns to town (not sure if this a good thing or not, but this team could certainly use some shooting). Don't love how all the pieces fit together, particularly from a shooting perspective, but there's at least some interesting pieces in place.
The Warriors bring Barnes back into the fold, filling a hole for them as a 3/D 4 man, while taking a flier on Carter as a 2nd year guard that could potentially be a nice piece for them.
The Spurs bring improve their long-term fit/shooting profile, bringing in Murray as a 3+D forward. Monk reunites with Fox, filling a 6th man scoring role for them.
Flame away, I would.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,907
- And1: 12,054
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
The whole point of Sac adding Kuminga is to finally get a second forward next to Keegan. I fail to see how this makes us better short term or long term.
Schroder - LaVine - Demar - Kuminga - Sabonis (Holy awful shooting)
Castle - Keon - Hield- Nique - Jones - Maxime
Not saying our lineup looks good now, but my god how many guys can you have that want the ball in their hands and can't shoot. Also the premise for Sac is off, we aren't building around LaVine. Perry has said repeatedly he isnt a long term piece. He's not a winning player. We don't want him, but asking him to be the only shooter in the lineup is certainly a decision.
This also doesn't feel like the direction Warriors want to go in. They don't get a 1st, they have to move off Buddy, they take back a guy the fan base hates. Sac's standalone offer to them is better than this.
For the Spurs this feels like a dream. 1st back (which the Kings can't do because it's partially traded to OKC top 16 protected). They add a forward who is a great fit next to Fox/Wemby. And they add Fox's best friend.
Schroder - LaVine - Demar - Kuminga - Sabonis (Holy awful shooting)
Castle - Keon - Hield- Nique - Jones - Maxime
Not saying our lineup looks good now, but my god how many guys can you have that want the ball in their hands and can't shoot. Also the premise for Sac is off, we aren't building around LaVine. Perry has said repeatedly he isnt a long term piece. He's not a winning player. We don't want him, but asking him to be the only shooter in the lineup is certainly a decision.
This also doesn't feel like the direction Warriors want to go in. They don't get a 1st, they have to move off Buddy, they take back a guy the fan base hates. Sac's standalone offer to them is better than this.
For the Spurs this feels like a dream. 1st back (which the Kings can't do because it's partially traded to OKC top 16 protected). They add a forward who is a great fit next to Fox/Wemby. And they add Fox's best friend.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,878
- And1: 4,120
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Way too good for the Kings at the Spurs' expense. And I hate SA, so I'd love to see them get worse.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,800
- And1: 35,875
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
This is tough because the three main players in this trade all get rated too highly in my opinion.
I have it as Castle > Murray >Spurs 1st > Kuminga. I think Castle and Kuminga are a poor fit together. The Kings should not target both. If I'm the Spurs, Murray hasn't shown enough over three seasons to make me give up Castle this early even with the pick.
I don't think this is fixable. Just cut the Spurs.
I have it as Castle > Murray >Spurs 1st > Kuminga. I think Castle and Kuminga are a poor fit together. The Kings should not target both. If I'm the Spurs, Murray hasn't shown enough over three seasons to make me give up Castle this early even with the pick.
I don't think this is fixable. Just cut the Spurs.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,390
- And1: 3,375
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Certainly wouldn't mind Black Falcon (does anybody even call him this anymore
) as the 3/4 on this Warriors team

Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,031
- And1: 241
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Kings don't need a castle. Murray is more valuable to the kings. We have so many offensive guards already, he doesn't have a role on the kings roster we have lavine and ellis at shooting guard. We can't trade lavine so this is just a bad move for the kings.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,052
- And1: 3,370
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Good deal for Warriors, bad deal for Kings, Spurs stealing value.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,687
- And1: 1,363
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
This is basically a non starter for all the above listed reasons.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,533
- And1: 6,175
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:Good deal for Warriors, bad deal for Kings, Spurs stealing value.
Is it? Barnes is JAG at this point and Carter looks like he's on the express train to Bustville.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,014
- And1: 609
- Joined: Jul 22, 2004
- Location: Warriorsworld
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Don’t see it as great for any of the three teams. Spurs I guess. No benefit to GS with no interest in Devin Carter and Barnes still reportedly having some hard feelings with Draymond.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,052
- And1: 3,370
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
gswhoops wrote:SkyHook wrote:Good deal for Warriors, bad deal for Kings, Spurs stealing value.
Is it? Barnes is JAG at this point and Carter looks like he's on the express train to Bustville.
Imo even if Barnes is "just another guy at this point", he showed this season that he's still better than Kuminga who has been nothing but iron pyrite so far in his career. I think that he's a better option for GSW by far than JK on the QO (but not if they can sign him to a team friendly deal, moveable on 12/15). I'd give Carter an incomplete at this point rather than a failing grade. Eye of the beholder, I guess.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,052
- And1: 3,370
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
NW wrote:Don’t see it as great for any of the three teams. Spurs I guess. No benefit to GS with no interest in Devin Carter and Barnes still reportedly having some hard feelings with Draymond.
That's a complicating factor I wasn't aware of. Donkey is the gift that keeps on giving.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,014
- And1: 609
- Joined: Jul 22, 2004
- Location: Warriorsworld
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:NW wrote:Don’t see it as great for any of the three teams. Spurs I guess. No benefit to GS with no interest in Devin Carter and Barnes still reportedly having some hard feelings with Draymond.
That's a complicating factor I wasn't aware of. Donkey is the gift that keeps on giving.
Not really pinning this one on Dray. Barnes still feeling some kind of way about Dray leading the charge for KD at his expense is more on him imo. Was the right move for all parties then (Barnes still got his deal with Dallas) and now
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,533
- And1: 6,175
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:gswhoops wrote:SkyHook wrote:Good deal for Warriors, bad deal for Kings, Spurs stealing value.
Is it? Barnes is JAG at this point and Carter looks like he's on the express train to Bustville.
Imo even if Barnes is "just another guy at this point", he showed this season that he's still better than Kuminga who has been nothing but iron pyrite so far in his career. I think that he's a better option for GSW by far than JK on the QO (but not if they can sign him to a team friendly deal, moveable on 12/15). I'd give Carter an incomplete at this point rather than a failing grade. Eye of the beholder, I guess.
I think I generally agree with your ranking (Kuminga on a negotiated deal > this trade > Kuminga on the QO); I just don't see the QO as a legitimate threat no matter how many times JK's agent floats it to the press. Unless he gets close to a max next offseason there's just no way he makes up the extra ~$37M he'd be leaving on the table on a 2/45 deal vs. the QO
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,003
- And1: 5,535
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
Spurs are giving value to help the Kings out. Makes no sense for them.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,052
- And1: 3,370
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
gswhoops wrote:SkyHook wrote:gswhoops wrote:Is it? Barnes is JAG at this point and Carter looks like he's on the express train to Bustville.
Imo even if Barnes is "just another guy at this point", he showed this season that he's still better than Kuminga who has been nothing but iron pyrite so far in his career. I think that he's a better option for GSW by far than JK on the QO (but not if they can sign him to a team friendly deal, moveable on 12/15). I'd give Carter an incomplete at this point rather than a failing grade. Eye of the beholder, I guess.
I think I generally agree with your ranking (Kuminga on a negotiated deal > this trade > Kuminga on the QO); I just don't see the QO as a legitimate threat no matter how many times JK's agent floats it to the press. Unless he gets close to a max next offseason there's just no way he makes up the extra ~$37M he'd be leaving on the table on a 2/45 deal vs. the QO
Taking the QO would be stupid on Kuminga's part, but am I remembering right that Aaron Turner was behind another stupid QO signing in the past? My memory is fuzzy on this.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,533
- And1: 6,175
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:gswhoops wrote:SkyHook wrote:Imo even if Barnes is "just another guy at this point", he showed this season that he's still better than Kuminga who has been nothing but iron pyrite so far in his career. I think that he's a better option for GSW by far than JK on the QO (but not if they can sign him to a team friendly deal, moveable on 12/15). I'd give Carter an incomplete at this point rather than a failing grade. Eye of the beholder, I guess.
I think I generally agree with your ranking (Kuminga on a negotiated deal > this trade > Kuminga on the QO); I just don't see the QO as a legitimate threat no matter how many times JK's agent floats it to the press. Unless he gets close to a max next offseason there's just no way he makes up the extra ~$37M he'd be leaving on the table on a 2/45 deal vs. the QO
Taking the QO would be stupid on Kuminga's part, but am I remembering right that Aaron Turner was behind another stupid QO signing in the past? My memory is fuzzy on this.
I don't know but I don't doubt it, he seems like kind of a moron tbh
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,014
- And1: 609
- Joined: Jul 22, 2004
- Location: Warriorsworld
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:gswhoops wrote:SkyHook wrote:Imo even if Barnes is "just another guy at this point", he showed this season that he's still better than Kuminga who has been nothing but iron pyrite so far in his career. I think that he's a better option for GSW by far than JK on the QO (but not if they can sign him to a team friendly deal, moveable on 12/15). I'd give Carter an incomplete at this point rather than a failing grade. Eye of the beholder, I guess.
I think I generally agree with your ranking (Kuminga on a negotiated deal > this trade > Kuminga on the QO); I just don't see the QO as a legitimate threat no matter how many times JK's agent floats it to the press. Unless he gets close to a max next offseason there's just no way he makes up the extra ~$37M he'd be leaving on the table on a 2/45 deal vs. the QO
Taking the QO would be stupid on Kuminga's part, but am I remembering right that Aaron Turner was behind another stupid QO signing in the past? My memory is fuzzy on this.
Victor Oladipo, who fired him not long after
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,169
- And1: 9,262
- Joined: Jan 22, 2012
-
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
SkyHook wrote:Taking the QO would be stupid on Kuminga's part, but am I remembering right that Aaron Turner was behind another stupid QO signing in the past? My memory is fuzzy on this.
Yeah Aaron Turner did it with Oladipo.
SkyHook wrote:NW wrote:Don’t see it as great for any of the three teams. Spurs I guess. No benefit to GS with no interest in Devin Carter and Barnes still reportedly having some hard feelings with Draymond.
That's a complicating factor I wasn't aware of. Donkey is the gift that keeps on giving.
It's more than just Draymond, salty toward the whole org as he was the one that had to go to get KD. Imagine you get drafted, start for a team that wins a chip and sets the record for wins in a season and you get shipped out.
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,687
- And1: 1,363
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: KINGS:SPURS:WARRIORS
DonaldSanders wrote:SkyHook wrote:Taking the QO would be stupid on Kuminga's part, but am I remembering right that Aaron Turner was behind another stupid QO signing in the past? My memory is fuzzy on this.
Yeah Aaron Turner did it with Oladipo.SkyHook wrote:NW wrote:Don’t see it as great for any of the three teams. Spurs I guess. No benefit to GS with no interest in Devin Carter and Barnes still reportedly having some hard feelings with Draymond.
That's a complicating factor I wasn't aware of. Donkey is the gift that keeps on giving.
It's more than just Draymond, salty toward the whole org as he was the one that had to go to get KD. Imagine you get drafted, start for a team that wins a chip and sets the record for wins in a season and you get shipped out.
Exactly. Can’t blame Barnes. He’s a class act and didn’t deserve that.
Return to Trades and Transactions