McCollum to Minnesota
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
McCollum to Minnesota
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,501
- And1: 17,973
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
McCollum to Minnesota
MIN trades: Naz Reid, Mike Conley
WAS trades: CJ McCollum
A bit of a ruthless deal for Minnesota, but they move for a point guard which they are clearly in desperate need of. Perhaps there is a variation with DDV instead of Conley that returns an additional asset from Washington?
Washington's power forward rotation is thin. This gives them a nice backup there who is young enough to hang around as the kids develop. I imagine they release Conley so he can sign with a contender.
WAS trades: CJ McCollum
A bit of a ruthless deal for Minnesota, but they move for a point guard which they are clearly in desperate need of. Perhaps there is a variation with DDV instead of Conley that returns an additional asset from Washington?
Washington's power forward rotation is thin. This gives them a nice backup there who is young enough to hang around as the kids develop. I imagine they release Conley so he can sign with a contender.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
Myth
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,863
- And1: 10,512
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
McCollum isn’t a point guard (Conley is) and the value difference is way off here.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
mhd
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,645
- And1: 1,688
- Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
Wiz say no. Obviously Reid is a good player, but he might hurt the tank (they need to ensure they finish with a top 4 worst record to ensure they don't lose their 1st rounder to the Knicks in 2026). By having no vet bigs with beef around Sarr, they are ensuring they lose a ton of games that way. Plus, they want to use their 100+ million in 2026-2027 cap space for taking on bad deals for picks.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,240
- And1: 36,273
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
mhd wrote:Wiz say no. Obviously Reid is a good player, but he might hurt the tank (they need to ensure they finish with a top 4 worst record to ensure they don't lose their 1st rounder to the Knicks in 2026). By having no vet bigs with beef around Sarr, they are ensuring they lose a ton of games that way. Plus, they want to use their 100+ million in 2026-2027 cap space for taking on bad deals for picks.
Wizards say yes and find a third team to give value for Naz (there will be a long line of teams willing to do so). But I suspect DDV would be the offer here with the same result. Tbc, I'm not sure Wolves can consolidate.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,239
- And1: 5,810
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
babyjax13 wrote:MIN trades: Naz Reid, Mike Conley
WAS trades: CJ McCollum
A bit of a ruthless deal for Minnesota, but they move for a point guard which they are clearly in desperate need of. Perhaps there is a variation with DDV instead of Conley that returns an additional asset from Washington?
Washington's power forward rotation is thin. This gives them a nice backup there who is young enough to hang around as the kids develop. I imagine they release Conley so he can sign with a contender.
CJ is not a long term solution for us, and Naz is too valuable to give away on a rental who is already past his prime and not a true PG.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
ReggiesKnicks
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,152
- And1: 2,626
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
mhd wrote:Wiz say no. Obviously Reid is a good player, but he might hurt the tank (they need to ensure they finish with a top 4 worst record to ensure they don't lose their 1st rounder to the Knicks in 2026). By having no vet bigs with beef around Sarr, they are ensuring they lose a ton of games that way. Plus, they want to use their 100+ million in 2026-2027 cap space for taking on bad deals for picks.
Wizards easily say yes here. Naz Reid is ranked somewhere between the 100th and 200th best players in the league. That player isn't meaningfully hurting a tank.
This deal isn't beneficial for Minnesota, as it doesn't actually address any of its pressing issues.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
shangrila
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,526
- And1: 6,600
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
babyjax13 wrote:MIN trades: Naz Reid, Mike Conley
WAS trades: CJ McCollum
A bit of a ruthless deal for Minnesota, but they move for a point guard which they are clearly in desperate need of. Perhaps there is a variation with DDV instead of Conley that returns an additional asset from Washington?
Washington's power forward rotation is thin. This gives them a nice backup there who is young enough to hang around as the kids develop. I imagine they release Conley so he can sign with a contender.
This is unsalvageable, to be honest.
Reid is the best player and asset in this deal, so they're already losing out there. And while the Wolves do need a PG they aren't to the point of desperation where they'd trade Reid for a guy who isn't a PG anyway.
And beyond plugging an immediate hole, what does this deal really do for the Wolves anyway? Does it move them closer to title contention? Debatable, since it sends out our 3rd leading scorer from last season with no way to replace him and further muddies an already crowded guard rotation. Does it make them better in the future? Not from a talent perspective, since McCollum is 34 and has been trending downwards. Maybe financially, since he's expiring? But if that was of concern the Wolves had other options in the summer to address it and didn't. So yeah, just a non-starter.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards

- Posts: 70,294
- And1: 22,717
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
Yeah, obviously the Wizards would do this for the value and then try and flip Naz elsewhere. But this is a bad deal for Minnesota. They are giving up too much value.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
LightTheBeam
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,981
- And1: 12,094
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
Feels like a lot of teams beat this very easily. Kings can offer Schroder/Monk for this same package happily. Would love to add Naz to Sac, especially if tanking is off the table. Would include Eubanks if they want him as well.
Kings could buy out Conley and let him join the Lakers or whatever contender has mins for him.
Sabonis/Cardwell/Maxime
Naz/Demar
Keegan/Nique
LaVine/Keon
Westbrook/Carter
Gobert/Eubanks/Beringer
Randle/Miller
McDaniels/Shannon
Edwards/DDV
Schroder/Monk
Kings could buy out Conley and let him join the Lakers or whatever contender has mins for him.
Sabonis/Cardwell/Maxime
Naz/Demar
Keegan/Nique
LaVine/Keon
Westbrook/Carter
Gobert/Eubanks/Beringer
Randle/Miller
McDaniels/Shannon
Edwards/DDV
Schroder/Monk
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
Godaddycurse
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,297
- And1: 14,192
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
LightTheBeam wrote:Feels like a lot of teams beat this very easily. Kings can offer Schroder/Monk for this same package happily. Would love to add Naz to Sac, especially if tanking is off the table. Would include Eubanks if they want him as well.
Kings could buy out Conley and let him join the Lakers or whatever contender has mins for him.
Sabonis/Cardwell/Maxime
Naz/Demar
Keegan/Nique
LaVine/Keon
Westbrook/Carter
Gobert/Eubanks/Beringer
Randle/Miller
McDaniels/Shannon
Edwards/DDV
Schroder/Monk
I agree kings can outbid this but wolves would prefer CJ over schroder/monk imo.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
LightTheBeam
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,981
- And1: 12,094
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
Godaddycurse wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Feels like a lot of teams beat this very easily. Kings can offer Schroder/Monk for this same package happily. Would love to add Naz to Sac, especially if tanking is off the table. Would include Eubanks if they want him as well.
Kings could buy out Conley and let him join the Lakers or whatever contender has mins for him.
Sabonis/Cardwell/Maxime
Naz/Demar
Keegan/Nique
LaVine/Keon
Westbrook/Carter
Gobert/Eubanks/Beringer
Randle/Miller
McDaniels/Shannon
Edwards/DDV
Schroder/Monk
I agree kings can outbid this but wolves would prefer CJ over schroder/monk imo.
Due to contract or play?
Because I think both lean towards the Kings.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
jscott
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,055
- And1: 1,349
- Joined: Oct 14, 2004
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
The value is way off. Wolves don’t consider this.
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
-
jowglenn
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,221
- And1: 3,390
- Joined: May 16, 2006
-
Re: McCollum to Minnesota
I think a third team would need to be looped in to receive Naz, sending someone else to the Wiz and value to Minnesota
Return to Trades and Transactions

