Nets Get: PJ Washington, Klay Thompson
Mavs get: Jrue Holiday
Blazers get: Julius Randle
Not sure, what else may need to be added to balance this out, but rationale being Mavs consolidate pieces into a guard that fits and would be a great locker room addition. Nets got value for taking on Randle to begin with, and PJ is younger and should fit better with Egor/Mikel. Blazers turn one of their many guards into a forward they lack.
Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890
Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
Godaddycurse
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,465
- And1: 16,622
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Think Nets prefer Randle over PJ to raise their floor
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
- JasonStern
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,560
- And1: 4,453
- Joined: Dec 13, 2008
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Works for me. As does Godaddycurse's Nets/Blazers return being swapped.
Mavs probably complain as-is, but Jrue can play fine next to Kyrie.
Mavs probably complain as-is, but Jrue can play fine next to Kyrie.

Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
tester551
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,971
- And1: 1,520
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
JasonStern wrote:Works for me. As does Godaddycurse's Nets/Blazers return being swapped.
Mavs probably complain as-is, but Jrue can play fine next to Kyrie.
Randle wouldn't be my first choice, or even second/third choice.
But value is fair and it helps balance the roster-> so it works for me too
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
Myth
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,701
- And1: 11,534
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
I’d take either return for Portland .
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
ecuhus1981
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,187
- And1: 1,677
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
I gotta decline for Brooklyn. I'm not the most enthused about Julius, but it was a good trade for value and he's got a GREAT attitude about coming to the Nets. His contract is not too large a number and only 2 years, and he'll have a chance to feature in a larger role and increase his value.
I'm not saying Randle is a core piece, but if it's not for a young star, I'd rather keep him. PJ is not that, and I'm not keen on his contract.
I'm not saying Randle is a core piece, but if it's not for a young star, I'd rather keep him. PJ is not that, and I'm not keen on his contract.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
TheNetsFan
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,692
- And1: 2,958
- Joined: Feb 11, 2007
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Definitely a no for Brooklyn. The Nets need a usage guy like Randle to ease the pressure on the young guards.
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
-
Michaellam1987
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,550
- And1: 503
- Joined: Jan 22, 2020
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
No for DAL. Why to trade for Holiday who does not fit the team's timeline? Obvious yes for POR.
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,487
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Mavs-Blazers-Nets
Pretty terrible for BK.
If anything they cutout the middle man and go for Jrue, slide everyone up a spot in their current 1-3.
Jrue
MBJ
Egor
MPJ
Sharpe
If anything they cutout the middle man and go for Jrue, slide everyone up a spot in their current 1-3.
Jrue
MBJ
Egor
MPJ
Sharpe

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Return to Trades and Transactions

